Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Neurosci. 2024 Jul 22;19(2):106–123. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2024.2377666

Table 2.

Behavioral Task Results

Overall (N = 55)* iAUD (n = 26) HCV (n =29)

CPT mean sd min max mean sd mean sd F (1,47) pancova
RT, Overall 0.42 0.06 0.31 0.57 0.42 0.07 0.42 0.06 0.36 0.55
RT, Commision Errors 0.35 0.08 0.14 0.58 0.35 0.08 0.36 0.07 2.48 0.12
RT, Correct 0.41 0.06 0.31 0.57 0.42 0.07 0.41 0.06 0.36 0.55
Accuracy 87.97% 8.04% 68.33% 100.00% 88.81% 7.61% 87.21% 8.47% 1.49 0.23
Commision Error Rate 9.42% 5.63% 0.00% 20.30% 8.75% 5.59% 10.03% 5.69% 0.69 0.41
Ommision Error Rate 2.61% 4.46% 0.00% 17.50% 2.44% 4.23% 2.76% 4.72% 1.35 0.25

Stroop Overall (N = 60) iAUD (n = 30) HCV (n = 30) F (1,51) pancova

Interference Score, Neutral Environment 52.1 6.69 38 71 51.97 7.53 52.23 7.37 0.50 0.48
Interference Score, Alcohol Cued Environment 55.22 7.39 40 77 55.73 6.99 54.69 6.45 1.55 0.22
Interference Score, Alcohol - Neutral Enviornment 2.2 8.92 −46 19 3.77 6.93 0.63 10.44 0.64 0.43
Number of Errors, Alcohol - Neutral Environment 0.22 0.92 −2 3 0.2 0.96 0.23 0.9 0.21 0.65

Notes: Descriptive statistics (means, variances, and ranges) for behavioral tasks of sustained attention (CPT) and cognitive inference (Stroop), reported across the sample and broken down by group. Groups compared using a two-tailed Welch two-sample t-test. One HCV subject did not complete the Stroop within the alcohol cued environment. *statistics, descriptives, and number of subjects included reflect the removal of 5 outliers who had <60% accuracy on the CPT or average response time >700 ms. Abbreviations as follows: RT- response time; CPT- continuous performance task; AUD- individuals with alcohol use disorder group; HCV- healthy control volunteer group; sd- standard deviation; F()- test statistic (degrees of freedom); pancova - p-value for the group differences test