Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 5;17:3855–3868. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S444443

Table 2.

Univariate/Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis of NFS1 Expression, OS, and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Patients with GC

Characteristics Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P value
Gender
 Male vs Female 0.988 (0.665–1.468) 0.952 0.967 (0.631–1.482) 0.878
Age (years)
 ≥65 vs <65 1.428 (1.009–2.020) 0.044 1.133 (0.786–1.633) 0.502
Tumor location
Upper vs Middle + lower 1.063 (0.743–1.521) 0.739 0.854 (0.583–1.251) 0.418
Tumor size (cm)
 ≥5 vs <5 2.220 (1.584–3.112) <0.001 1.221 (0.850–1.755) 0.280
Depth of invasion
 T3 + T4 vs T1 + T2 8.559 (3.766–19.450) <0.001 2.248 (0.861–5.868) 0.098
Lymph node metastasis
 Present vs Absent 7.891 (4.819–12.921) <0.001 2.776 (1.060–7.274) 0.038
M stage
 M1 vs M0 7.811 (4.857–12.561) <0.001 4.169 (2.529–6.872) <0.001
Differentiation
 Poor + undifferentiated vs Well + moderate 2.035 (1.413–2.929) <0.001 1.559 (1.049–2.316) 0.028
TNM stage
 III + IV vs I + II 8.024 (4.988–12.906) <0.001 1.662 (0.624–4.424) 0.309
NFS1
 High vs Low 3.362 (2.138–5.287) <0.001 2.516 (1.571–4.031) <0.001