Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;36(7):944–961. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2023.2236222

Table 3.

Quantitative analysis results

  Statistically highly significant (weighted 0.54)
Statistically less significant (weighted 0.25)
Statistically non-significant values (weighted 0.21)
Violence Risk Valuea
  Fusion Out-Group Dehumanisation Justification of Violence Explicit Calls for and Announcements of Violence Out-Group Demonisation Out-Group Slurs Hopelessness of Alternative Solutions Existential Threat Belief in Conspiracy of Out-Group Inevitable War Narrative Martyrdom Narrative Violent Role Model Violence Risk Index Estimated
Violence Risk
Far-Right Extremist Groups
Iron March 0.86 percent 1.03 percent 0.34 percent 1.55 percent 0.95 percent 2.75 percent 0.00 percent 0.43 percent 0.60 percent 0.26 percent 0.00 percent 0.09 percent 88 VERY HIGH
Charlottesville 2.0 0.42 percent 0.12 percent 0.07 percent 0.25 percent 0.35 percent 2.47 percent 0.01 percent 0.10 percent 0.12 percent 0,01 percent 0,03 percent 0.00 percent 36 HIGH
Anticom 0.11 percent 0.19 percent 0.03 percent 0.25 percent 0.21 percent 2.10 percent 0.00 percent 0.09 percent 0.05 percent 0.01 percent 0.02 percent 0.00 percent 28 HIGH
The Right Server 0.17 percent 0.07 percent 0.00 percent 0.10 percent 0.15 percent 1.36 percent 0.00 percent 0.06 percent 0.05 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 18 MEDIUM
Non-Extremist Control Groups
Football Forums 0.14 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.03 percent 0.14 percent 0.04 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 4 LOW
Third Hour 0.06 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.00 percent 0.02 percent 0.02 percent 0.01 percent 0.03 percent 0.00 percent 1 LOW

aThe following classification scheme was used for the results of the Violence Risk Index: low: < 10, medium: 10–30, high: 30–70 percent, “very high”: > 70.