Table 3:
Relationship between change in ImPACT scores and change in connectivity measures in football players n = 50
| Change in ImPACT Composite (Post minus Pre) | Change in Connectivity Measure (Post minus Pre) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IHC of dACC | Within-SN Connectivity | |||
| Correlation | P Value | Correlation | P Value | |
| Verbal Memory compositea | −0.04 | .76 | 0.29c | .04c |
| Visual Memory compositea | 0.07 | .65 | 0.01 | .95 |
| Visual Motor compositea | 0.02 | .91 | 0.13 | .38 |
| Reaction Time compositeb | −0.06 | .68 | –0.09 | .54 |
| Total Symptom Scoreb | −0.3c | .03c | 0.17 | .24 |
Note:—Post indicates postseason; Pre, preseason.
Pearson correlation coefficients.
Spearman correlation coefficients, because these variables were non-normally distributed.
Statistically significant.