Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 Aug 19;13:e97027. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97027

Iron-sulfur cluster loss in mitochondrial CISD1 mediates PINK1 loss-of-function phenotypes

Sara Bitar 1, Timo Baumann 1, Christopher Weber 1, Majd Abusaada 1, Liliana Rojas-Charry 1, Patrick Ziegler 2, Thomas Schettgen 2, Isabella Eva Randerath 2, Vivek Venkataramani 3, Bernhard Michalke 4, Eva-Maria Hanschmann 5, Giuseppe Arena 6, Rejko Krueger 6,7,8, Li Zhang 1,, Axel Methner 1,
Editors: Sameh Ali9, Benoît Kornmann10
PMCID: PMC11383524  PMID: 39159312

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of the midbrain. Familial cases of PD are often caused by mutations of PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) and the ubiquitin ligase Parkin, both pivotal in maintaining mitochondrial quality control. CISD1, a homodimeric mitochondrial iron-sulfur-binding protein, is a major target of Parkin-mediated ubiquitination. We here discovered a heightened propensity of CISD1 to form dimers in Pink1 mutant flies and in dopaminergic neurons from PINK1 mutation patients. The dimer consists of two monomers that are covalently linked by a disulfide bridge. In this conformation CISD1 cannot coordinate the iron-sulfur cofactor. Overexpressing Cisd, the Drosophila ortholog of CISD1, and a mutant Cisd incapable of binding the iron-sulfur cluster in Drosophila reduced climbing ability and lifespan. This was more pronounced with mutant Cisd and aggravated in Pink1 mutant flies. Complete loss of Cisd, in contrast, rescued all detrimental effects of Pink1 mutation on climbing ability, wing posture, dopamine levels, lifespan, and mitochondrial ultrastructure. Our results suggest that Cisd, probably iron-depleted Cisd, operates downstream of Pink1 shedding light on PD pathophysiology and implicating CISD1 as a potential therapeutic target.

Research organism: D. melanogaster, Human, Mouse

eLife digest

Parkinson’s disease affects millions of people worldwide, causing progressively worse symptoms like stiffness, tremors and difficulty moving. These issues result from the death of neurons in the brain that produce the neurotransmitter dopamine. While most cases have no known cause, 10 to 15 per cent are due to inherited gene mutations. This includes mutations in the genes that code for the proteins PINK1 and Parkin which are essential for maintaining healthy mitochondria, the powerhouse of the cell.

Mutations in this quality control system affect a protein called CISD1, which sits within the outer surface of the mitochondria. CISD1 contains a cluster of iron and sulfur ions, and is involved in regulating iron levels and mitochondrial energy production. However, its role in inherited cases of Parkinson’s disease, particularly those related to mutations in PINK1 and Parkin, is poorly understood.

To understand the impact of CISD1, Bitar et al. studied genetically modified fruit flies and dopamine-producing neurons from Parkinson’s patients with PINK1 mutations. This revealed that losing PINK1 activity led to higher levels of CISD1 proteins which lacked the iron-sulfur cluster due to a bond forming between two CISD1 molecules.

Reducing levels of the CISD1-equivalent protein in the flies helped to alleviate most of the symptoms caused by PINK1 and Parkin gene mutations, such as difficulties climbing and impaired wing posture. These findings suggest that iron-depleted CISD1 contributes to the symptoms associated with Parkinson’s disease, underscoring its potential as a drug target.

Drugs that target CISD1 already exist, which could ease the way for further research. Recent studies have shown that cases of Parkinson’s related to mutations in PINK-1 share features with some non-inherited instances of the disease, suggesting that this approach could potentially benefit many patients.

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the fastest growing neurodegenerative disorder clinically characterized by rigor, tremor, and bradykinesia. These motor symptoms stem from the progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain’s substantia nigra pars compacta (reviewed in Pickrell and Youle, 2015). While most cases are sporadic, familial forms of PD are linked to mutations in genes that encode proteins involved in mitochondrial quality control like PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) and Parkin (PRKN), providing valuable insights into the pathophysiology of PD (Shulman et al., 2011). In healthy cells, PINK1 is continuously imported into mitochondria, where it is rapidly degraded (Narendra et al., 2008). However, in unfit mitochondria with a reduced mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), PINK1 import stalls. When PINK1 accumulates on damaged mitochondria, it phosphorylates various proteins, including the E3 ubiquitin ligase PRKN. This phosphorylation activates PRKN, enabling it to attach ubiquitin to mitochondrial proteins. This ubiquitination acts as a signal for damaged mitochondria to be identified and engulfed by autophagosomes, initiating their degradation through mitophagy. This selective elimination of compromised mitochondria safeguards overall mitochondrial health and function (reviewed in Youle and Narendra, 2011). Much of this mechanistic understanding has been elucidated in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster where Pink1 and Prkn loss of function results in profound changes of the mitochondrial ultrastructure causing mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired flight and climbing ability, and a shortened lifespan (Clark et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006).

In addition to disturbances in mitochondrial quality control, disruptions in iron metabolism contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of PD (Ma et al., 2021). PD patients exhibit elevated iron levels within the substantia nigra pars compacta, and this iron accumulation correlates with the severity of the disease (Dexter et al., 1987; Hirsch et al., 1991). Notably, this iron dysregulation is apparent even in asymptomatic carriers of PRKN mutations (Pyatigorskaya et al., 2015), suggesting that it is an early event and correlates with mitochondrial dysfunction. Furthermore, human dopaminergic neurons lacking PINK1 display inhibition of the iron-dependent mitochondrial aconitase, leading to accumulation of NAD+ and depletion of essential metabolites (Bus et al., 2020). In flies, Pink1 deficiency similarly results in inactivation of mitochondrial aconitase by impairing its labile iron-sulfur cluster, leading to oxidative distress and mitochondrial swelling (Esposito et al., 2013; Wan et al., 2020). These findings highlight the relevance of iron dysregulation in the PD development and progression.

An important target protein of PINK1/PRKN crucial for iron homeostasis and redox homeostasis is CISD1, also known as mitoNEET (reviewed in Mittler et al., 2019). CISD1 is a homodimeric protein N-terminally inserted into the outer mitochondrial membrane facing the cytosol (Wiley et al., 2007a). CISD1 is ubiquitinated by PRKN (Sarraf et al., 2013) and its levels are reduced upon dissipation of Δψm (Chan et al., 2011; Cunningham et al., 2015; Lazarou et al., 2013; McWilliams et al., 2018; Narendra et al., 2012; Okatsu et al., 2012). Moreover, CISD1 forms a complex with PRKN, and this interaction is markedly increased by activation of PINK1 and ubiquitination (Narendra et al., 2013; Sarraf et al., 2013). In Drosophila, the homolog of CISD1 is the most strongly ubiquitinated protein in response to Prkn overexpression in vivo (Martinez et al., 2017).

Functionally, CISD1 exists as a homodimer, and each monomer of CISD1 harbors an 2Fe/2S (2 iron/2 sulfur) cluster coordinated by three cysteines (Cys72,74,83) and one histidine (His87). In contrast, most conventional 2Fe/2S clusters are coordinated by four cysteines or two cysteines and two histidines (Wiley et al., 2007b). This peculiarity renders the CISD1 2Fe/2S cluster more susceptible to oxidation. It was thus proposed that the transfer of the iron-sulfur cluster from CISD1 to stress-sensitive Fe/S proteins constitutes a cellular adaptive response that helps recovery from oxidative injury (reviewed in Mittler et al., 2019). In support of this hypothesis, it has been demonstrated that the oxidized 2Fe/2S cluster of CISD1 can be transferred to iron regulatory protein 1 (IRP1) (Ferecatu et al., 2014), a bifunctional protein that can switch between two distinct enzymatic activities based on the availability of iron. When iron levels are sufficient, IRP1 binds an 2Fe/2S cluster, converting it into a functional aconitase enzyme. When iron levels are low, IRP1 loses its 2Fe/2S cluster and undergoes a conformational change. In this state, known as the ‘apo’ form, IRP1 functions as an RNA-binding protein and binds to specific RNA sequences called iron-responsive elements (IREs) located in the untranslated regions of target mRNAs (reviewed by Rouault and Maio, 2017). CISD1 is capable of recycling the cytosolic apo-IRP1 to holo-aconitase by donating its 2Fe/2S cluster (Camponeschi et al., 2017). The fate of the remaining apo-CISD1 is unknown. In addition to its role in iron metabolism and defense against oxidative distress, CISD1 is also involved in mitochondrial bioenergetics and in the regulation of mitochondrial morphology. Cardiac myocytes from Cisd1 knockout (KO) mice exhibit a reduced mitochondrial oxidative capacity (Wiley et al., 2007a), akin to KO mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) where this dysfunction is attributed to a reduction in the total cellular mitochondrial volume (Vernay et al., 2017).

In Drosophila, there is a single ortholog of CISD1 initially named Cisd2 because it is slightly more similar to the mammalian CISD2 than to CISD1 (Jones et al., 2014) protein. Human CISD2 is located at the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Wang et al., 2014). Overexpression of Cisd2 (this publication used the alternative name Dosmit) in fly muscles is detrimental and results in mitochondrial enlargement and the formation of double-membraned vesicles containing cytosolic proteins within mitochondria (Chen et al., 2020), implicating Cisd2 in the regulation of mitochondrial morphology. Similar to human CISD1, fly Cisd2 is an Fe/S protein and all amino acids linked to cluster coordination are conserved. In addition, fly Cisd2 (this publication used the alternative name MitoNEET) interacts with IRP1 (Huynh et al., 2019) further linking Cisd2 to iron homeostasis. Together these findings suggest that fly Cisd2 rather resembles the human mitochondrial homolog CISD1 and to avoid confusion, we will henceforth use Cisd for the fly ortholog. Based on the involvement of mammalian CISD1 in mitochondrial bioenergetics and quality control, iron metabolism and defense against oxidative distress – all hallmarks of PD – we aimed to investigate CISD1’s role in PD using both fly and mammalian model systems.

In our study, we identified CISD1, particularly its iron-depleted apo form, as a downstream mediator of the PD pathology induced by the loss of Pink1 and Prkn function. Apo-CISD1 accumulates in PINK1 patient-derived human dopaminergic neurons and apo-Cisd in mutant Pink1 flies. Complete loss of Cisd rescues all detrimental effects of Pink1 loss of function on climbing ability, wing posture, dopamine levels, lifespan, and mitochondrial ultrastructure. In Prkn mutant flies, Cisd deficiency ameliorates climbing ability and wing posture impairments, but does not mitigate the reduction in lifespan. These findings strongly suggest that the buildup of iron-depleted CISD1 may contribute to the pathophysiology of both familial and sporadic PD.

Results

Increased CISD1 dimer formation in human dopaminergic neurons from PD patients with a PINK1 Q456X mutation

To investigate a possible involvement of CISD1 and its homolog CISD2 in familial PD, we studied their expression levels in differentiated dopaminergic neurons from two distinct patients afflicted with autosomal-recessive PD caused by PINK1 Q456X mutation. This specific mutation introduces a premature stop codon, leading to increased apoptosis of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive dopaminergic neurons, accompanied by increased levels of alpha-synuclein in the surviving dopaminergic neurons and astrogliosis (Jarazo et al., 2022). Both PINK1 mutant and gene-corrected induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were first converted into neuroepithelial stem cells (NESCs) and then further differentiated into midbrain-specific dopaminergic neurons as previously described (Reinhardt et al., 2013). Notably, PINK1 Q456X neurons expressed diminished PINK1 mRNA levels (Figure 1A) and reduced levels of tyrosine hydroxylase (as depicted in exemplary blots from our differentiations in Figure 1B, with quantification of different independent differentiations reported in Jarazo et al., 2022).

Figure 1. Increased CISD1 dimer formation in human dopaminergic neurons from Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with a PINK1 Q456X mutation.

Figure 1.

(A) Quantitative PCR analysis of PINK1 mRNA expression in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived dopaminergic neurons from PD patients carrying the PINK1 Q456X mutation, colors indicate two different patients. ACTB served as housekeeping control. Expression levels were normalized to gene-corrected (GC) controls. (B) Immunoblots of tyrosine hydroxylase as a marker for dopaminergic neurons and beta-tubulin 3 as a general neuronal marker. Actin served as loading control, size is indicated. (C, C’) Immunoblots of CISD1 and CISD2 with lysates from different patients, GC controls, and independent differentiations over 28 days in vitro. Monomeric and dimeric forms of both proteins are indicated by arrows. CISD1 knockout (KO) and wildtype (WT) mouse embryonic fibroblasts served to identify the correct bands. Actin served as loading control, size is indicated. (D) Quantification of the CISD1 dimer/monomer ratio reveals an increased ratio in PINK1 Q456X dopaminergic neurons over gene-corrected controls. Each data point corresponds to an independent differentiation over 28 days and the colors designate the two different patients. Data in A were normalized to the respective gene-corrected control and are presented as box and whisker plots with the box extending from the 25th to the 75th percentile and the whiskers from the minimum to the maximum value depicting all individual data points. Data points in D correspond to the mean of two independent technical replicates of five independent differentiations from two patients and are unnormalized. Statistical analysis was done using the one-sided t test in A and a nested t test in D, p values are indicated.

Figure 1—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots of iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons from PD patients carrying the PINK1 Q456X with their gene corrected controls.
Figure 1—source data 2. Raw data of PCR and immunoblot quantifications of Figure 1.

We then employed immunoblotting to concurrently assess the abundance of both mitochondrial CISD1 and ER CISD2 proteins, because both proteins are recognized by our antibody (Martinez et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2014). The ability of this antibody to identify both homologs was previously demonstrated by subcellular fractionation (Wang et al., 2014) and specific siRNA-mediated knockdown of either CISD1 or CISD2 (Martinez et al., 2024). It is also noteworthy that both proteins form homodimers with high stringency even on reducing gels (Antico et al., 2021; Paddock et al., 2007). Cisd1 KO and wildtype (WT) MEFs (Vernay et al., 2017) served to identify the correct bands (Figure 1C/C’). Our immunoblots revealed no changes in the abundance of CISD1 or CISD2. However, we clearly observed an increased presence of the CISD1 dimer in mutant PINK1 neurons. Notably, both patients exhibited an elevated dimer/monomer ratio with variations in each individual differentiation in patient #1, and a more pronounced effect in patient #2, implying the presence of additional patient-specific factors. When pooled together, this analysis revealed a significant increase in CISD1 dimerization in mutant PINK1 neurons compared to gene-corrected controls (Figure 1D). This heightened propensity for dimer formation therefore appears to be relevant for human PD.

CISD1 lacking its iron-sulfur cluster has a higher propensity to dimerize

To next clarify under which conditions CISD1 exhibits a heightened propensity to run as a dimer, we developed a split luciferase assay to investigate CISD1 dimerization in living cells in a dynamic and reversible manner (Dixon et al., 2016). We fused CISD1 with the two small subunits of NanoLuc luciferase, enabling us to quantify dimerization by measuring luminescence. Given the labile nature of CISD1’s iron-sulfur cluster due to its unconventional coordination by one histidine and three cysteines, we hypothesized that the presence or absence of this cluster might influence dimerization. We therefore mutated histidine 87 to cysteine (H87C) which results in a more stable 2Fe/2S complex coordination (Conlan et al., 2011). Conversely, the mutation of cysteine 83 to serine (C83S) completely abolishes the ability of CISD1 to bind the 2Fe/2S complex. By comparing the dimerization patterns of the CISD1 variants, we observed a significant increase in dimerization for C83S CISD1, the mutant incapable of binding the iron-sulfur cluster (Figure 2A). This finding suggested that iron-depleted CISD1 has a higher propensity for dimerization. To further validate these findings, we next employed an in silico approach to calculate the molecular hydrophobicity potential and the angle of rotation between two CISD1 WT models or two CISD1 C83S models (Polyansky et al., 2014). This analysis unveiled a larger surface-surface contact between the C83S monomers, indicating a closer binding compared to WT CISD1 (Figure 2B). This aligns with the results from the dimerization assay (Figure 2A).

Figure 2. CISD1 lacking its iron-sulfur cluster has a higher propensity to dimerize.

Figure 2.

(A) Cells were transiently transfected with wildtype (WT) or point-mutated CISD1 tagged with split NanoLuc fragments. Luminescence was quantified after 48 hr. (B) 2D maps of the molecular hydrophobicity potential (MHP) on the peptide surfaces in two CISD1 models or two C83S models. Dimerization interfaces are outlined. Axis values correspond to the rotation angle around the helical axis (α) and the distance along the latter (Z), 2D maps are colored according to MHP arbitrary units. The surface-surface area is indicated by a solid line. (C) Cells were transiently transfected with WT CISD1 tagged with split NanoLuc fragments and treated for 2 hr with 1 µM carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), 2.5 µM antimycin and oligomycin (A/O), or 1 mM deferiprone (Def) before addition of substrate and quantification of luminescence. (D) Immunoblot of WT mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells treated for the indicated period of time with 1 mM Def or vehicle (Veh). Knockout (KO) cells served as control for antibody specificity and actin as loading control. Each data point in A and C is from five independent experiments done in triplicates. Data are presented as box and whisker plots with the box extending from the 25th to the 75th percentile and the whiskers from the minimum to the maximum value depicting all individual data points. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA, p values are indicated.

Figure 2—source data 1. Immunoblots of WT MEF cells treated with deferiprone or vehicle.
Figure 2—source data 2. Raw data of the dimerization assays in Figure 2.

Given that CISD1 is an important target of the PINK1/PRKN machinery, we hypothesized that conditions that induce mitophagy might yield a similar increase in dimerization. To investigate this, we conducted our dimerization assay in cells subjected to a 2 hr treatment with the uncoupling agent carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), a combination of the complex V inhibitor oligomycin and the complex III inhibitor antimycin A (A/O), or the iron chelator deferiprone, which triggers a distinct form of mitophagy independent of PINK1 and PRKN (Allen et al., 2013). The 2 hr treatment was chosen to exclude alterations caused by degradation of CISD1. Remarkably, our results demonstrated that under these conditions only iron chelation resulted in increased dimerization (Figure 2C) that mirrored the increased dimerization seen in the C83S mutant, which is unable to coordinate the 2Fe/2S complex (Figure 2A). To corroborate this, we expanded our analysis to WT MEF cells treated with deferiprone. Immunoblotting revealed increased dimer formation and even the presence of a CISD1 multimer under these conditions (Figure 2D). Consequently, we conclude that the increased dimer formation in the PINK1 mutant neurons likely represents the presence of apo-CISD1, a form of CISD1 devoid of its iron-sulfur cluster, and that this is caused by changes in the iron homeostasis.

Increased Cisd dimer levels in Pink1 mutant flies reflect an increased intermolecular disulfide bond between two Cisd molecules

We next investigated whether Pink1 loss of function in flies mirrors the human situation and impacts Cisd dimerization or possibly abundance. Pink1B9 flies (Park et al., 2006) are on the w1118 background and have a large deletion of the coding region and almost no remaining mRNA expression (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). At the mRNA level, we observed no changes in Cisd mRNA levels in Pink1B9 flies (Figure 3A). We then immunoblotted samples from young (3-day-old) and old (8-week-old) WT w1118 and Pink1B9 flies and noted that fly Cisd, similar to mouse CISD1, runs as a monomer and dimer even on reducing gels containing dithiothreitol (DTT) (Figure 3B). We quantified total Cisd protein levels, i.e., monomer plus dimer and normalized them to actin. Additionally, we assessed the dimer/monomer ratio. This analysis unveiled reduced total Cisd protein levels in young Pink1 mutant flies compared to WT flies (Figure 3C). We were unable to replicate the previously reported age-dependent increase in Cisd abundance in WT flies (Chen et al., 2020) and Pink1B9 (Martinez et al., 2024) flies although this was evident in many but not all samples indicating additional factors. When assessing the dimer/monomer ratio, we observed a significant increase in dimer levels in old Pink1B9 flies compared to young Pink1B9 flies and to old WT flies (Figure 3D). Age had no effect on dimerization of WT flies (Figure 3D). Thus, Pink1 mutant flies manifest analogous alterations to those observed in dopaminergic neurons from patients afflicted by familial PD due to PINK1 Q456X mutation (Figure 1D). To elucidate the nature of the dimer, we next used extremely reducing conditions of prolonged incubation with higher concentrations of DTT and tris-(2-carboxyethyl)-phosphine as a disulfide-bond breaking agent followed by boiling. This resulted in the loss of dimeric and an increase of monomeric Cisd (Figure 3E). We also added the thiol alkylating agent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) during lysis and performed non-reducing immunoblotting in old Pink1B9 flies compared to old WT flies. NEM blocks all reduced sulfhydryl (-SH) groups of cysteine residues and thereby prevents the formation of disulfide bonds due to non-specific oxidation during the lysis process (Figure 3F). We also observed the increased dimer formation in old Pink1B9 flies under these conditions (Figure 3F). Together these experiments indicate that the increased dimerization in old Pink1B9 flies is most probably caused by the formation of an intermolecular disulfide linking two Cisd molecules.

Figure 3. Increased Cisd dimer levels and altered redox and iron homeostasis in Pink1 mutant flies.

(A) Quantitative PCR analysis of Cisd mRNA levels in Pink1B9 flies. RpL32/Rp49 served as housekeeping control. Each dot represents the mean relative transcriptional level of a sample of five flies. The values were normalized to the mean value of wildtype (WT) flies. (B) Immunoblot analysis of Cisd abundance in the indicated fly strains at different ages, 3 days (d) and 8 weeks (w). Actin served as loading control, size is indicated. (M) Cisd monomers and (D) dimers. (C) Total Cisd (D+M) normalized to actin. Each dot represents the mean of two technical replicates from n=12 independent samples of two male flies. (D) Dimer/monomer ratio of the same samples. (E) Immunoblot analysis of Cisd protein levels in w1118 flies. Samples were exposed to a non-reducing buffer (NR) or reducing buffer containing 100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 50 mM TCEP. Cisd knockout (KO) lysates served as negative control for the Cisd bands. Actin served as loading control, size is indicated. (M) Cisd monomers and (D) dimers. (F) Cisd immunoblot analysis in the absence and presence of N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) and the reducing agent DTT and quantification of the dimer/monomer ratio in the presence of NEM. (G) Total iron content and (H) Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio measured via electrophoresis-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CE-ICP-MS) in WT and Pink1B9 flies. Each dot represents a group of three male flies. n=5. (I) Flies of the same age, number, and sex ratio were allowed to mate and lay eggs in normal food or food prepared with a 65 µM final concentration of deferiprone. Each dot represents the average number of eclosed flies per vial and day for 3 consecutive days. Data are presented in A/C/D as box and whisker plots with the box extending from the 25th to the 75th percentile and the whiskers from the minimum to the maximum value depicting all individual data points and as scatter plots with the mean and SD in F–I. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA in A, two-way ANOVA in C/D, and Student’s t test in F–I, p values are indicated.

Figure 3—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots of young and old wildtype and Pink1B9 flies blotted against CISD1 or actin as well as flies treated with or without NEM or DTT.
Figure 3—source data 2. Raw data of PCR and immublotting and iron measurments quantification as well as flies eclosion from Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Validation of Pink1 knockout flies.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Pink1 genomic organization with mRNA/exons represented as light gray boxes. A 571 nt deletion extending from the 2nd to 4th exon is shown in orange. Validation PCR, using indicated primers (dark gray triangles), results in a 917 nt product for wildtype Pink1 and 246 nt for knockout Pink1. mRNA levels were assessed using quantitative PCR (qPCR) with primers at the 4th and 5th exon junction. HKG: housekeeping gene, Rp49; Ctrl: control flies, w1118; KO: Pink1 mutant flies (Pink1B9).
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw and labeled gels from a gel electrophoresis validating Pink1 knockout flies.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Raw data of the quantification of the Pink1 knockout flies.

Altered iron homeostasis reflecting a more pro-oxidative state in old Pink1B9 flies

Having demonstrated that iron dyshomeostasis induced by the iron-depleting agent deferiprone results in increased CISD1 dimer formation in fibroblasts, we next investigated iron dynamics in Pink1 mutant flies compared to controls by employing mass spectrometry. This revealed a heightened total iron content in Pink1 mutants (Figure 3G). Delving deeper with capillary electrophoresis-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CE-ICP-MS), we then identified an enrichment of redox-active Fe2+ ions in these mutants compared to the more subdued presence of redox-inactive Fe3+ (Figure 3H). In the Fenton reaction, ferrous iron (Fe2+) forms hydroxyl radicals (•OH), a highly reactive and destructive free radical, and ferric iron (Fe3+) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Pink1B9 flies are therefore in a more pro-oxidative state. Pink1B9 flies were also dramatically more susceptible to iron depletion with deferiprone. In these experiments, we fed developing WT and Pink1 mutant flies food supplemented with 65 µM deferiprone, a concentration that did not induce widespread mitophagy in Pink1B9 flies (Lee et al., 2018), and quantified the number of adult flies eclosing from pupae. This revealed that iron depletion also showed a trend toward reduced eclosion of WT flies but nearly completely abrogated the eclosion of Pink1 mutant flies (Figure 3I). Collectively, these results support a connection between iron dyshomeostasis, redox imbalance, and the presence of an intermolecular disulfide bond between two molecules of Cisd leading to apo-Cisd, although establishing causality in this relationship is challenging.

Overexpression of Cisd and apo-Cisd in Drosophila is detrimental

To investigate potential detrimental effects of apo-Cisd and whether these would be more pronounced in the absence of functional Pink1, we next overexpressed either Cisd or a mutated Cisd C/S where we mutated all cysteine residues that coordinate the Fe/S cluster to serines (C100S, C102S, and C/S) in WT w1118 and Pink1B9 mutant flies using the mild ubiquitous Gal4 driver daughterless (da). Cisd C/S constitutes a constitutive apo-Cisd variant. Flies overexpressing mitochondrially targeted GFP (mtGFP) served as control. Ectopic expression of Cisd in muscle tissue was already shown previously to reduce lifespan by enlarging mitochondria and the formation of intramitochondrial vesicles (Chen et al., 2020). We chose negative geotaxis (the ability to climb) and lifespan – known hallmarks of the Pink1B9 phenotype (Clark et al., 2006) – as readouts and found that Pink1B9 flies have reduced negative geotaxis and lifespan as expected. Ubiquitous overexpression of Cisd and apo-Cisd aggravated these phenotypes in WT and Pink1 mutant flies (Figure 4A). Cisd C/S overexpression was, however, associated with a more profound reduction in climbing speed compared to WT Cisd, while the effects on lifespan were similarly detrimental (Figure 4A). Additionally, the vast majority of all Cisd C/S-overexpressing flies were not capable of inflating their wings (Figure 4B), a rather non-specific phenotype which can result from genetic mutations, environmental conditions, and developmental defects. This phenotype did not occur in WT Cisd or mitoGFP-overexpressing flies (Figure 4B). Based on the above-observed more pro-oxidative state in Pink1B9 flies (Figure 3E/F), we next quantified glutathione S-transferase S1 (GstS1) mRNA levels in flies overexpressing Cisd and apo-Cisd. GstS1 is part of the antioxidant response and was identified previously in an unbiased genetic screen for genes that modify Prkn phenotypes (Greene et al., 2005). It was also shown that overexpression of GstS1 in dopaminergic neurons suppresses neurodegeneration in Prkn mutants (Whitworth et al., 2005). Interestingly, newly eclosed flies expressing C/S Cisd displayed significantly higher levels of GstS1 mRNA in w1118 in line with a compensatory increase in the defense against oxidative distress induced by apo-Cisd (Figure 4C). Pink1B9 flies, in contrast, were not capable of raising this antioxidant defense in response to apo-Cisd expression (Figure 4C) which might explain part of the additional toxic effect. In summary, our findings suggest an adverse impact of both WT and iron-depleted Cisd on climbing speed and lifespan. Under conditions of robust expression, apo-Cisd appears to exert an even more pronounced deleterious effect possibly by influencing redox homeostasis.

Figure 4. Overexpression of Cisd and apo-Cisd in Drosophila is detrimental.

Figure 4.

(A) Climbing assay and median survival of flies overexpressing mitochondrially targeted GFP (mtGFP), Cisd, or Cisd C/S (all Fe/S coordinating cysteines mutated to serines) on standard food. Overexpression was achieved using the UAS-Gal4 system and the mild ubiquitous daughterless (Da) driver line on a w1118 or PinkB9 background. In the climbing assay, each dot represents the percentage of a group of 25 flies that successfully climbed more than 8 cm within 8 s. For the median survival, the number of dead flies was scored every 2 days and fresh food was supplied. Each dot represents the median lifespan of a group of 25 flies. (B) Representative image and quantification of the % of eclosed flies with non-inflated wings overexpressing Cisd C/S on a PinkB9 background 3 days after eclosion. (C) Quantitative PCR analysis of GstS1 mRNA levels in newly eclosed flies. Rp49 served as housekeeping control. Each dot represents the mean relative transcriptional level of a sample of five flies. The values were normalized to the mean value of control flies (da-Gal4>mtGFP). Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA, p values are indicated.

Figure 4—source data 1. Raw data of the quantification of climbing and lifespan and wing phenotype as well as quantitative PCR anaylsis of flies overexpressing Cisd or CS mutant on wildtype or Pink1B9 background.
Figure 4—source data 2. Image of flies under the microscope to show the uninflated wing phenotype in the flies overexpressing the CS mutant on a Pink1B9 background.

Cisd depletion rescues Pink1 mutant phenotypes

To clarify whether depleting the potentially detrimental (apo) Cisd could mitigate Pink1 pathology, we first used a ubiquitous knockdown of Cisd in Pink1B9 mutant flies by RNAi driven by the tubulin driver focusing on lifespan as a readout. Because Pink1 resides on the fly heterosome, hemizygous male flies represent a complete KO while heterozygous female flies still retain one functional allele and serve as controls. Knockdown of Cisd led to an approximately 60% reduction of Cisd protein levels (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A, B). Importantly, this knockdown effectively rescued the reduced lifespan (Figure 5—figure supplement 1C) of Pink1 mutant males, suggesting a detrimental effect of Cisd in flies lacking Pink1. To rule out any potential unspecific effects resulting from RNAi, we subsequently generated a complete KO of the entire genomic sequence of Cisd in w1118 flies using CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Figure 5—figure supplement 2A). Flies devoid of Cisd protein expression exhibited no discernible difference in climbing ability up to 30 days of age (Figure 5—figure supplement 2B) and only a minor reduction in lifespan (Figure 5—figure supplement 2C). This contrasts with a previously reported Cisd null mutant generated by transposon integration (Cisd2G6528), which was shown to increase lifespan (Chen et al., 2020). The complete KO allowed us to observe that Cisd not only runs as a monomer (M), a dimer (D) as shown and quantified earlier, but also as a weak multimer (X) (Figure 5A). Given the unavailability of functional antibodies against fly Pink1, we quantified Pink1 mRNA levels to verify the loss of Pink1 expression in Pink1B9 flies and to investigate potential dysregulations in Cisd KO flies. Pink1 levels were reduced in Pink1B9 but unchanged in Cisd KO flies (Figure 5B). We then investigated the effect of complete Cisd depletion on the phenotypes described in mutant Pink1B9 flies including reduced dopamine levels, lifespan, climbing ability, a morphological wing phenotype caused by atrophy of the wing muscles, and an altered mitochondria ultrastructure (Clark et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006). As expected, Pink1B9 flies exhibited reduced climbing ability (Figure 5C), an abnormal wing posture (Figure 5D), a decreased lifespan (Figure 5E), and diminished dopamine levels (Figure 5F) in line with prior reports (Clark et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006). We then generated double-knockout flies (DKO) lacking both Cisd and Pink1, with the loss of Cisd expression shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 3. Remarkably, when compared to Pink1B9 flies these DKO exhibited normal climbing ability, normal wing morphology, normal dopamine levels, and a normal lifespan, essentially representing a complete rescue of these phenotypes (Figure 5C–F).

Figure 5. Cisd depletion rescues Pink1 mutant phenotypes.

(A) Immunoblot analysis of Cisd protein levels in wildtype and Cisd knockout (KO) flies, actin served as loading control. Note the presence of Cisd monomers (M), dimers (D), and multimers (X). (B) Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of Pink1 mRNA levels. RpL32/Rp49 served as housekeeping control. Each dot represents the mean relative transcriptional level of a sample of five flies. The values were normalized to the mean value of wildtype flies. (C) Climbing ability. DKO, double-knockout flies. Each dot represents the percentage of a group of 25 flies that climbed more than 8 cm within 10 s. (D) Abnormal wing posture evaluation. Percentage of flies with an abnormal wing posture. Each dot represents an individual trial of a group of 25 flies. (E) Median survival on standard food. Fresh food was supplied and the number of dead flies was scored every 2 days. Each dot represents the median lifespan of a group of 25 flies. (F) Dopamine levels quantified by HPLC. Each dot represents a group of 4 flies sampled at different days. (G) Representative transmission electron microscopy of flight muscle morphology from Pink1 mutant and DKO. Scale bar as indicated. Exemplary pictures from wildtype and Cisd KO flies are shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 4. (H) Quantification of the indicated parameters. Each dot represents the average values from one image from 2 flies per genotype that were used for the analysis. Data are presented as box and whisker plots with the box extending from the 25th to the 75th percentile and the whiskers from the minimum to the maximum value depicting all individual data points. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA, p values are indicated.

Figure 5—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots of wildtype and Cisd knockout flies probed against CISD1 and Actin.
Figure 5—source data 2. Raw data of quantifications of climbing and wing posture and survival and dopamine levels and mitochondrial EM parameters of wildtype and CisdKO and Pink1B9 and doubleknockout flies.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. RNAi-mediated knockdown of Cisd protects against Pink1 loss of function.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A) Immunoblot demonstrating Cisd knockdown, always-early RNAi served as control, and actin as loading control. Note the presence of Cisd monomers (M) and dimers (D) even in reducing gels. (B) Quantification of five independent immunoblots. Statistical analysis was done using the Student’s t test, p value is indicated. (C) Survival of hemizygous Pink1B9 on standard food. Fresh food was supplied and the number of dead flies was scored every 2 days, n is indicated.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots showing Cisd knockdown in flies.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Excel file containing raw data of the quantification of the blot showing Cisd KD as well as survival curve of Pink1B9 hemizygous flies.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Phenotypes of Cisd knockout (KO) flies.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2.

(A) Scheme depicting the construction of Cisd KO flies. (B) Climbing ability assessment. Each dot represents the percentage of a group of 25 flies that climbed more than 8 cm within 10 s. (C) Survival of wildtype (w1118) and Cisd KO flies on standard food. Fresh food was supplied and the number of dead flies was scored every 2 days, n is indicated.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Raw data from climbing and survival of wildtype and CisdKO flies.
Figure 5—figure supplement 3. Double-knockout flies lack Cisd protein expression.

Figure 5—figure supplement 3.

Immunoblot analysis of Cisd abundance in the indicated fly strains 3 days after eclosion. Actin served as loading control, size is indicated. (M) Cisd monomers and (D) dimers.
Figure 5—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots against CISD1 in fly strains wildtype and CisdKO and Pink and Park mutant flies and double knockout flies.
Figure 5—figure supplement 3—source data 2. Raw and labeled blots of indicated fly strains blotted against CISD1.
Figure 5—figure supplement 4. Exemplary transmission electron microscopy pictures.

Figure 5—figure supplement 4.

Representative transmission electron microscopy of flight muscle morphology from the indicated fly strains. Scale bar as indicated.
Figure 5—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Labeled image of transmission electron microscopy from flies’ flight muscle of indicated strains.
Figure 5—figure supplement 4—source data 2. Raw transmission electron microscopy images with scale bar from flight muscle of indicated strains.

We further investigated whether these favorable effects of Cisd KO directly influenced mitochondria or stemmed from alternative non-mitochondrial factors. Flight muscles are densely populated with mitochondria and have been previously shown to be significantly impacted by the Pink1B9 mutation (Clark et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006). In Pink1B9 flies, flight muscles are atrophied and mitochondria cover less space, are smaller, and have a significantly reduced number of cristae resulting in a reduction of cristae surface (Figure 5G, a comparison of all four genotypes is shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 4). Intriguingly, the concurrent Cisd KO effectively rescued all these phenotypes (Figure 5H). Together these data strongly suggest that Cisd, most probably apo-Cisd, assumes a toxic function in Pink1 mutant flies and serves as a critical mediator of Pink1-linked phenotypes, including the disruption of the normal mitochondria and cristae morphology.

Cisd gene reduction partially protects Prkn mutant flies

Pink1B9 and Prkn mutant flies (named Park25, also w1118 background; Park et al., 2006) exhibit remarkably similar phenotypes, and previous elegant work in flies established that Pink1 functions upstream of Prkn (Clark et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006). Furthermore, Cisd is the most prominent Prkn target in flies (Martinez et al., 2017). We therefore next investigated whether Prkn mutation also affects Cisd abundance or dimerization and whether loss of Cisd also protects against Prkn loss-of-function pathology. Given the absence of functional antibodies against fly Prkn, we used quantitative PCR (qPCR) to verify Prkn depletion in Prkn mutant flies. As expected, Park25 flies expressed no Prkn mRNA, but, intriguingly, Cisd mRNA was also dramatically reduced in Prkn mutant flies (Figure 6A). Similarly, Prkn mRNA was nearly undetectable in Cisd KO flies (Figure 6B). When we examined total Cisd protein levels, we observed a downregulation of total Cisd levels in both young and old Prkn mutant flies in line with the mRNA results (Figure 6C). An exemplary blot is provided in Figure 6C’, a blot demonstrating Cisd depletion also in Prkn/Cisd DKO is shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 3. The dimer/monomer ratio was unchanged and displayed again a considerable degree of variability (Figure 6D, D’). We concluded that the substantial regulation of Prkn mRNA in Cisd KO flies and Cisd mRNA and protein in Park25 flies suggests that these genes function within related pathways.

Figure 6. Cisd gene reduction partially protects Prkn mutant flies.

Figure 6.

(A, B) Quantitative PCR analysis of Prkn and Cisd mRNA levels in Cisd knockout (KO) and Park25 flies. RpL32/Rp49 served as housekeeping control. Each dot represents the relative transcriptional level of a sample of five flies. The values were normalized to the mean value of wildtype flies. (C) Total Cisd (D+M) normalized to actin. Each dot represents the mean of two technical replicates from n=12 wildtype and n=8 Park25 independent samples of two male flies. The wildtype samples shown for comparison are the same as in Figure 5C/D. (D) Dimer/monomer ratio of the same samples. (C’, D’) Immunoblot analysis of Cisd abundance in the indicated fly strains at different ages, 3 days (d) and 8 weeks (w). Actin served as loading control, size is indicated. (M) Cisd monomers and (D) dimers. The gap indicates the removal of the Pink1B9 samples shown in Figure 5 that were run on the same blot. (E) Climbing ability assessment. Each dot represents the percentage of a group of 25 flies that successfully climbed more than 8 cm within 10 s. (F) Abnormal wing posture evaluation. Percentage of flies with an abnormal wing posture. Each dot represents an individual trial of a group of 25 flies. (G) Median survival on standard food. Fresh food was supplied and the number of dead flies was scored every 2 days. Each dot represents the median lifespan of a group of 25 flies. Data are presented as box and whisker plots with the box extending from the 25th to the 75th percentile and the whiskers from the minimum to the maximum value depicting all individual data points. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA in A/B/F/G and two-way ANOVA in C/D, p values are indicated.

Figure 6—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots of CISD1 expression in wildtype and Park25 flies.
Figure 6—source data 2. Raw data of the quantification of quantitative PCR anaylsis and immunoblot analysis and climbing assay and wing posture and survival of wildtype and Park25 and dKO flies.

Like Pink1B9 flies, Park25 flies exhibited a notable reduction in climbing ability (Figure 6E), an abnormal wing posture (Figure 6F), and a shortened lifespan (Figure 6G), consistent with previous reports (Clark et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006). Intriguingly, concurrent Cisd KO conferred complete protection against the climbing impairment of Park25 flies (Figure 6E) and showed a distinct inclination toward normal wing posture with DKO being not significantly different from WT flies (Figure 6F). However, surprisingly, DKO did not rescue the lifespan of Park25 flies (Figure 6G). This observation suggests that Cisd likely serves an essential, yet undiscovered, function, particularly in the aging fly, and its loss is compensated for in the presence of Prkn.

Discussion

We here identified the mitochondrial protein CISD1, specifically its iron-depleted form, as a potential downstream mediator of the pathophysiological effects arising from the loss of PINK1 function, and to a certain extent, Parkin loss of function.

Our investigation revealed that both dopaminergic neurons from familial PD patients with PINK1 mutations and Pink1 mutant flies exhibit increased levels of a slower-migrating form of CISD1/Cisd on immunoblots. The presence of this slow migrating form of CISD1/Cisd was age-dependent in flies and apparent in human dopaminergic neurons after 28 days of differentiation. We did not assess whether this increased even more in older cultures but such an age-dependent increase would be in line with the fact that PD usually becomes symptomatic at an older age. The slower-migrating form likely does not represent a ubiquitinated form, as treatment with the deubiquitinase USP2 had no effect on fly Cisd dimerization (Martinez et al., 2024). Additionally, it is improbable that the slower-migrating Cisd form is an unrelated protein, as under non-reducing conditions, fly Cisd shifted to the dimeric form (Martinez et al., 2024) while harsh reducing conditions shifted Cisd to the monomeric form (Figure 3E). Based on our experiments, we conclude that the slower-migrating form of CISD1/Cisd corresponds to a dimer caused by the formation of an intermolecular disulfide bond between two molecules of CISD1/Cisd. The dimeric form has been described before even in recombinant CISD1. Under non-reducing conditions, recombinant CISD1 ran as a monomeric and a dimeric band while under reducing conditions using beta-mercaptoethanol only the monomeric band was detected (Roberts et al., 2013). Using proteomic analysis, it was determined that the disulfide bond forms between cysteine C83 and either C72 or C74 of CISD1 (Roberts et al., 2013). Formation of the disulfide bond therefore results in loss of the Fe/S cluster because the residues involved in bond formation also coordinate the Fe/S cluster of CISD1. It is unclear what comes first, loss of the Fe/S cluster followed by disulfide bond formation or vice versa disulfide bond formation followed by loss of the Fe/S cluster. However, CISD1 C83S, a genetically engineered CISD1 incapable of binding the iron-sulfur cluster and probably also incapable of forming a disulfide bond (Roberts et al., 2013), has a higher propensity for dimer formation when analyzed in a cellular assay based on complementation of split luciferase (Figure 2A). This suggests that Fe/S cluster loss comes first and results in an altered structure that facilitates the formation of the disulfide bond. The iron-sulfur cluster of CISD1 is easily lost because it is coordinated in an unconventional manner by one histidine (H) and three cysteines (C) instead of the more common 2H/2C or 4C coordination (Wiley et al., 2007b). This serves to transfer the iron-sulfur cluster to other proteins as part of a cellular adaptive response that helps recovery from oxidative injury (reviewed in Mittler et al., 2019).

One protein that can accept the Fe/S cluster from holo-CISD1 is IRP1, as previously demonstrated (Ferecatu et al., 2014). Also in flies, Cisd physically interacts with holo-IRP1, and its deficiency renders flies more susceptible to iron depletion (Huynh et al., 2019), as also observed by us for Pink1 mutant flies. How apo-CISD1 is then reconstituted is rather unclear. A recent report suggested that CISD1 can receive its Fe/S cluster from its homolog CISD3 (aka MiNT) in the mitochondrial matrix via the porin VDAC1 (Karmi et al., 2022). So it appears possible that either this transfer is inhibited/attenuated or that the apo-CISD1/Cisd observed in PINK1 mutant dopaminergic neurons and Pink1 mutant flies constitutes a permanently fixed apo-CISD1/Cisd that cannot be reconstituted. This disruption could result in a defective recycling of cytosolic apo-IRP1 into holo-IRP1, leading on the one hand to a deficiency in cytosolic aconitase activity. Knockdown of CISD1 in cells indeed significantly reduces the cytosolic aconitase activity (Tan et al., 2016). On the other hand, apo-IRP1 not only lacks aconitase activity but also binds to IREs in the mRNA of iron-responsive genes (Haile et al., 1992a; Haile et al., 1992b). Association with IREs in the 5’ untranslated region of ferritin mRNA inhibits ferritin translation resulting in less bound iron and an increase in free iron (Chen et al., 1997) while association with IREs in the 3’ untranslated region of the mRNA encoding the iron importers transferrin receptor 1 and SLC11A2 stabilizes the mRNAs and facilitates their translation resulting in increased iron import (Galy et al., 2010). Together the transcriptional changes caused by the presence of apo-IRP1 result in iron overload which is an important factor in the pathology associated with PD (recently reviewed in Ma et al., 2021). Our study also revealed increased total iron levels in Pink1 mutant flies. Notably, KO of PINK1 in flies (Esposito et al., 2013), in mice (Gautier et al., 2008), and in human dopaminergic neurons (Bus et al., 2020) also results in a reduced aconitase activity in mitochondria. Mitochondrial aconitase contains an IRE in its 5’ untranslated region (Kim et al., 1996), making its expression subject to repression by apo-IRP1. The inactivation of mitochondrial aconitase caused by Pink1 loss of function triggers increased superoxide production, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial swelling (Esposito et al., 2013). Others reproduced these findings and reported that overexpression of mitoferrin, a mitochondrial iron transporter, mitigates the reduced mitochondrial aconitase activity, abnormal wing posture, flight deficits, and mitochondrial morphology defects associated with Pink1 loss of function by elevating mitochondrial bioavailable iron levels (Wan et al., 2020). Interestingly, KO of IRP2, a protein highly homologous to IRP1 but lacking aconitase activity, results in iron accumulation and Parkinsonism in mice (LaVaute et al., 2001). An interaction of CISD1 with IRP2 has not been reported so far but appears likely. In summary, these results strongly implicate altered mitochondrial iron homeostasis and redox dysregulation in fly and human models of PD and link it to CISD1 dysfunction. The accumulation of apo-CISD1/Cisd and the subsequent inability to repair defective IRP1/2 would place CISD1 upstream of the changes in iron homeostasis observed in PD and models of PD (Ma et al., 2021).

Our results also suggest that apo-CISD1 exhibits a toxic gain of function possibly independent of the effects on iron homeostasis. Ubiquitous overexpression of Cisd and apo-Cisd in flies aggravated known phenotypes of Pink1 mutation as a reduced climbing ability and lifespan. This was evident in WT and Pink1 mutant flies and overexpression of apo-Cisd was associated with a more profound reduction in climbing speed and resulted in an inability to completely inflate their wings. Interestingly, prolonged exposure of MEFs to the iron-depleting agent 2,2′-bipyridine results in downregulation of Cisd1 (Key et al., 2020) possibly as a compensatory mechanism to limit the abundance of such a toxic iron-depleted CISD1. In line with a toxic function of Cisd and apo-Cisd, removing fly Cisd by KO of the coding sequence completely protected flies against Pink1 depletion-induced changes in climbing ability, abnormal wing posture, dopamine levels, and lifespan but ameliorated only the climbing ability and wing posture in Prkn mutant flies. Previous work demonstrated that ectopic overexpression of Cisd in muscle decreased the lifespan of flies and resulted in enlarged mitochondria containing numerous intramitochondrial vesicles surrounded by a double membrane (Chen et al., 2020). Our data now indicate that this process might contribute to the pathophysiology resulting from the loss of Pink1/Prkn-mediated mitochondrial quality control.

Very recent work, published during the revision of this manuscript, discovered that both genetic and pharmacological suppression of CISD1 and Cisd restored increased calcium release from the ER conferred by PINK1 and Parkin mutation in mammalian cells and flies (Ham et al., 2023). However, the specific role of apo-Cisd in this remains to be fully elucidated. Also Martinez et al. very recently reported that Cisd depletion using RNAi protects against Pink1 and Prkn loss of function in flies (Martinez et al., 2024), suggesting that a reduction, instead of a complete KO, of Cisd as used by us is more beneficial in Park25 flies and equally beneficial in Pink1B9 flies. In their hands, Cisd levels increased in Pink1 and Prkn mutant flies which was not evident in our study. Cisd overexpression was neurotoxic, disrupted mitochondrial morphology, and led to an accumulation of phospho-ubiquitin which they speculate also blocks mitophagy, resulting in the accumulation of more defective mitochondria (Martinez et al., 2024). All three papers propose distinct mechanisms for the toxic effects of CISD1 in PD. While our study suggests a role in redox imbalance and iron dysregulation, particularly implicating the iron-depleted form of CISD1, Ham et al., 2023, describe its impact on ER calcium release, and Martinez et al., 2024, propose interference with autophagy/mitophagy. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, as they often intersect. Both studies support our findings, replicating key results, but also underscore the need for further research to fully elucidate the interplay of these proposed mechanisms.

In summary, our results suggest that the mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster protein Cisd is downstream of the pathophysiological cascade initiated by Pink1 and partially Prkn loss of function in flies and probably also in humans. This sheds light on the pathophysiology of PD and implicates CISD1 as a therapeutic target protein.

Methods

Human dopaminergic neurons

iPSCs from two PD patients carrying the p.Q456X mutation in PINK1 were obtained from the University of Lübeck. Both participants signed a written informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for conducting iPSC studies in Krüger’s lab was granted by the National Committee for Ethics in Research, Luxembourg (Comité National d'Ethique de Recherche; CNER #201411/05). For both mutant lines, isogenic gene-corrected controls have been successfully generated and characterized previously (Jarazo et al., 2022). Both PINK1-mutant and isogenic iPSCs were first converted into NESCs, based on the protocol previously described (Reinhardt et al., 2013). NESCs were cultivated in N2B27 medium (DMEM-F12/Neurobasal 50:50, supplemented with 1:200 N2, 1:100 B27 without vitamin A, 1% L-glutamine and 1% penicillin/streptomycin), containing 3 µM CHIR-99021, 0.5 µM purmorphamine (PMA), and 150 µM ascorbic acid. For the generation of midbrain-specific neurons, NESC maintenance medium was replaced by N2B27 containing 1 µM PMA, 200 µM ascorbic acid, 10 ng/mL BDNF, 10 ng/mL GDNF, 1 ng/mL TGF-b3, and 500 µM dbcAMP. After 6 days, differentiating NESCs were shifted to the same medium but without PMA (replaced every 2 days) and kept until day 28.

Immunoblotting

Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris•HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Cells were then centrifuged at maximum speed for 30 min at 4°C and the supernatant containing the whole-cell proteins was collected. Flies were isolated in the same buffer but were mechanically smashed with a dounce, centrifuged and the supernatant was collected. For regular immunoblots, protein samples were denatured in 1× loading Laemmli sample buffer (Tris-HCl, SDS, glycerol, bromophenol blue) already containing 50 mM DTT, samples for non-reducing blots were denatured in 1× loading Laemmli sample buffer without DTT. Samples were then boiled at 95°C for 5 min. Harsher reducing conditions were generated by treating the samples with 100 mM DTT or the combination of 100 mM DTT and 50 mM TCEP, incubation for 30 min at RT, and boiling for 10 min at 95°C. The Cisd redox blot was used to quantify the ratio between monomeric and dimeric Cisd following the alkylation of reduced thiols. Here, 100 mM NEM was added to the lysis buffer to preserve the in vivo redox state of Cisd and to prevent redox changes during sample preparation. Proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a semi-dry blotting system (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Membranes were blocked with 3% milk or 5% BSA in TBST for 1 hr at RT. Membranes were incubated with the respective antibodies overnight at 4°C, rotating. Antibodies used were rabbit anti-CISD1 (Proteintech, 1:1000), mouse anti-actin (Merck Chemicals, 1:1000), rabbit anti-HA (Abcam, 1:1000), rabbit anti-TH (Millipore, AB152, 1:1000), mouse anti-TUBB3 (Bio-Legend, 801201, 1:20,000), and mouse anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, 3700, 1:30,000). Fluorescence-labeled secondary antibodies were used at a 1:10,000 dilution, and the signal was detected using a Li-Cor Odyssey imaging system and quantified with the Image Studio Lite software. This imaging system is linear and oversaturation is indicated. The intensity was normalized to the loading control and the mean per blot.

Dimerization assay

Split nanoluc fragments LgBit and SmBit (Promega) were cloned N-terminally to human CISD1 and point mutations introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (NEB). All plasmids were sequence verified. Experiments were carried out by transfecting HT22 cells with the plasmids for 48 hr after which 1 volume of the Nanoluc Live-Cell substrate was added with 19 volumes of Nano-Glo LCS Dilution Buffer. Where indicated, a final concentration of FCCP (1 µM), oligomycin/antimycin (2.5 µM each), deferiprone (1 mM; Allen et al., 2013) or vehicle was added to the cells 2 hr prior to the addition of the substrate.

Fly experiments

Cisd KO flies were generated by Wellgenetics (Taiwan, ROC) and contain the cassette depicted in Figure 5—figure supplement 2A. Pink1B9, Park25, UAS-mtGFP, UAS-Cisd-WT, UAS-Cisd C/S flies were a kind gift of Alex Whitworth (Mitochondrial Biology Unit, MRC, Cambridge, UK). TubP-Gal4 (BDSC 5138), Da-Gal4 (BDSC 8641), Elav-Gal4 (BDSC 458), and UAS-Cisd2-RNAi (BDSC 33749) were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center (BDSC). The RNAi control strains UAS-vasa-RNAi (VDRC46464) and UAS-always-early-RNAi (VDRC13673) were from the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC). Lifespan: Fruit flies were provided with standard molasses-based food and accommodated in a climate chamber at a temperature of 25°C with a 12 hr light and 12 hr darkness schedule. The flies were given fresh food every 2 days and dead flies were scored. Each experiment consisted of four groups of 25 flies. Where indicated, fly food was prepared with deferiprone with a final concentration of 65 µM. Climbing: A total of four groups, each consisting of 25 flies per genotype per age, were tested in vials of a 2 cm diameter. The percentage of flies that were able to successfully traverse a height of 8 cm within 10 s or 8 s (as indicated) was documented. The assay was always replicated at the same time of day. Scoring for eclosed flies: Fly food was prepared either with vehicle or with deferiprone (65 µM). A 3:1 ratio of female virgin flies to male flies (5 days of age) were added and allowed to mate. These were then removed and the number of eclosing male flies per vial was quantified each day for 3 days. Scoring wing phenotype: A 3:1 ratio of female virgin flies to male flies (5 days of age) were added and allowed to mate. These were then removed and the number of flies eclosing with curly wings or non-inflated wings was noted for 3 days. Quantitative RT-PCR: RNA extraction was carried out with the ZR RNA MiniPrep kit (ZYMO RESEARCH) and cDNA was synthesized from 10 ng/µL RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kits (Life Tech). FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Rox) (Merck) was used for qPCR, with primers from Eurofins available on demand. The 2−ΔΔCt (Ct, cycle of threshold) method was employed to calculate transcriptional levels, where ΔΔCt = ΔCt of experimental group – mean ΔCt of control groups. ΔCt = Ct (gene of interest) − Ct (RpL32/Rp49). RpL32/Rp49 served as housekeeping control. All flies used for these experiments were male. Genomic DNA isolation and PCR: Genomic DNA was extracted from flies using the Biozym gDNA Kit and PCR amplification performed to assess the deletion in the Pink1 gene using the Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs). Primer sequences: rp49 F 5′FCGGATCGATATGCTAAGCTGT 3′ R GCGCTTGTTCGATCCGTA 3′. Cisd F 5´GGCCAACCATCCTTGAA 3′R 5′ CTTGTCAAGTCTGCCGGTTC 3′. Pink F 5´CTCTGTGCACAACGTCTTCCACTACAG 3′ R 5´GAATTCGCTGGAGAAGTCACATTGAAG 3′. GstS1 F 5´ATCAAGCACAGCTACACGCT 3′ R 5′ CGAGGAATCGAGCCATCGAA 3′.

Dopamine quantification

Flies were anesthetized with CO2 and heads removed while gently holding the flies with a tweezer. Heads were immediately put in a solution containing 200 µL 5% TCA, 300 µL RIPA buffer, and 10 µL dopamine standards at 4°C. Ceramic beads were added and lysis was performed by gently shaking for 5 min. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation for 5 min at 13,000 rpm twice. 200 µL of the supernatant was put in a fresh vial. Dopamine was determined via HPLC/MS/MS. 100 µL of 100 mM ammonium formate buffer (adjusted to pH 2.5 with formic acid) were added to 100 µL of the prepared extracts from fly heads in order to adjust pH in an HPLC vial with insert. 50 µL of this solution were injected into the LC/MS/MS system consisting of an Agilent 1260 Infinity II Series HPLC pump (G7112B) with integrated degasser and an Agilent 1260 Autosampler (G7167A) connected to an AB Sciex 4500 tandem mass spectrometer. Chromatography was performed on a Phenomenex Kinetex F5 column (2.6 µM, 150 mm × 4.6 mm) using water (adjusted to pH 2.5) and acetonitrile as solvents A and B, respectively. Starting conditions were 5% solvent B for 1 min, raised to 100% B at 10 min, kept at 100% B until 14 min and set back to 5% B until 19 min and kept for another 5 min until 24 min. Flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. Tandem mass spectrometric determination was performed in ESI-negative mode using the specific ion transition 154.0→>137.0 for dopamine and 158.0→140.9 for D4 dopamine as internal standard. We used an electrospray needle voltage of – 4500 V and nitrogen as a nebulizer and turbo heater gas (450°C) was set to a pressure of 65 psi. Nitrogen as curtain gas and collision gas was set to 10 instrument units, respectively. Calibration was performed in a mixture of 300 µL RIPA buffer and 200 µL 5% trichloroacetic acid in water, spiked with dopamine concentrations ranging from 1 to 50 µg/L in HPLC vials. 10 µL of the working solution of the internal standard (D4-dopamine, 1 mg/L in MeOH/HCl) were added to the standards, the vials were vortexed and centrifuged at 4.000 U/min (~3000×g). 100 µL of the supernatant was pipetted in a new HPLC vial with insert and 100 µL of 100 mM ammonium formate buffer (pH 2.5) were added. 50 µL of this solution was injected into the LC/MS/MS system as described. As dopamine is not stable under neutral/basic conditions, the spiking solutions of dopamine (1 mg/L and 100 µg/L) were freshly prepared daily from the stock solution (1 g/L in MeOH/HCl) in 0.1% HClkonz. in water.

Iron quantification

Iron redox speciation in fly lysates was carried out using CE-ICP-MS. To ensure interference-free monitoring of iron isotopes, dynamic reaction cell (DRC) technology employing NH3 as the DRC gas was utilized. A ‘PrinCe 706’ CE system (PrinCe Technologies B.V., Emmen, Netherlands) was employed for the separation process, applying a voltage of +20 kV. The temperature settings for both the sample/buffer tray and capillary were maintained at 20°C. An uncoated capillary (100 cm×50 µm ID; CS-Chromatographie Service GmbH, Langerwehe, Germany) was used for interfacing with ICP-DRC-MS. The CE-ICP-MS interface enabled electrical connection while preventing suction flow by operating in self-aspiration mode (Michalke et al., 2019). The electrolytes used included 10% HCl as the leading electrolyte, 0.05 mM HCl as the terminating electrolyte, and 50 mM HCl as the background electrolyte. The Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio was determined based on quantified concentrations of Fe species. An uncoated capillary (CS-Chromatographie Service GmbH, Langerwehe, Germany) measuring 85 cm in length with a 50 µm internal diameter was employed, connecting the CE system to the ICP-MS, served as the element-selective detector. A ‘NexIon 300-D’ ICP-DRC-MS system (Perkin Elmer, Rodgau-Jügesheim, Germany) served as the element-selective detector for iron electropherograms. Isotopes 56Fe and 57Fe were measured in DRC mode using ammonia as the DRC gas (0.58 mL NH3/min). The radio frequency (RF) power was set to 1250 W, and the plasma gas flow was 16 L Ar/min. The nebulizer gas flow rate at the CE-ICP-DRC-MS interface was optimized to 0.98 L Ar/min. Electropherograms were analyzed using Peakfit software (Systat, Inpixon GmbH Office, Düsseldorf, Germany). To assess iron recovery accuracy, total iron content was determined using ICP-sector field mass spectrometry (ICP-sf-MS). The ICP-sf-MS (‘ELEMENT 2’, Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) settings included an RF power of 1260 W, a plasma gas flow of 16 L Ar/min, an auxiliary gas flow of 0.85 L Ar/min, a nebulizer gas flow of 1.085 L Ar/min, and a dwell time of 300 ms. Quantified iron species from CE-ICP-DRC-MS were compared to total iron content (set at 100%), yielding values ranging between 92% and 110%.

Transmission electron microscopy

Fly thoraxes were isolated and fixed in a buffer containing Caco-buffer (0.2 M), 25% glutaraldehyde, and 15% paraformaldehyde. After fixation, tissues were washed in a wash buffer (0.2 M Caco-buffer diluted 1:1 with ddH2O) and incubated with 2% osmium in 0.2 M buffer. Tissues were washed again and dehydrated in ascending ethanol series 30–70% then left overnight at 4°C. The next day, the samples were dehydrated further in 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% ethanol solutions then washed with propylenoxide and left overnight in a 1:1 dilution of resin:proyleneoxide. Samples were moved the next day to just resin. The last day, flies were placed into a special mold with resin and left in an oven for 2 days. Samples were then cut and contrasted. Images were acquired with a Tecnai 12 Transmission Electron Microscope.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism. Data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Two parametric samples were compared using the Student’s t test, two nonparametric samples using the Mann-Whitney test, two normalized parametric samples using the one-sided t test, two nonparametric samples using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. More than two parametric samples were compared using one-way or two-way ANOVA and nonparametric samples using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the respective post hoc tests.

Acknowledgements

We thank Christine Klein and Philipp Seibler (University of Lübeck, Germany) who kindly shared the human iPSC lines from PD patients carrying the PINK1 p.Q456X mutation, and Jens Schwamborn and Javier Jarazo (LCSB, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg) for providing the corresponding gene-corrected controls. We also thank Marion Silies, JGU Mainz, for providing lab space and helpful discussions. This work contains data from the medical theses of Timo Baumann, Majd Abusaada, and Christopher Weber.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Li Zhang, Email: lizhang2017deu@gmail.com.

Axel Methner, Email: axel.methner@gmail.com.

Sameh Ali, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt, Egypt.

Benoît Kornmann, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 445683311 to Axel Methner.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 461705066 to Vivek Venkataramani, Axel Methner.

  • Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg C21/BM/15850547/PINK1-DiaPDs to Giuseppe Arena.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing.

Investigation.

Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Investigation.

Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Writing - review and editing.

Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Supervision, Project administration.

Supervision, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing.

Ethics

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from two PD patients carrying the p.Q456X mutation in PINK1 were obtained from the University of Lübeck. Both participants signed a written informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for conducting iPSC studies in Krüger's lab was granted by the National Committee for Ethics in Research, Luxembourg (Comité; National d'Ethique de Recherche; CNER #201411/05).

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

References

  1. Allen GFG, Toth R, James J, Ganley IG. Loss of iron triggers PINK1/Parkin-independent mitophagy. EMBO Reports. 2013;14:1127–1135. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antico O, Ordureau A, Stevens M, Singh F, Nirujogi RS, Gierlinski M, Barini E, Rickwood ML, Prescott A, Toth R, Ganley IG, Harper JW, Muqit MMK. Global ubiquitylation analysis of mitochondria in primary neurons identifies endogenous Parkin targets following activation of PINK1. Science Advances. 2021;7:eabj0722. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj0722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bus C, Zizmare L, Feldkaemper M, Geisler S, Zarani M, Schaedler A, Klose F, Admard J, Mageean CJ, Arena G, Fallier-Becker P, Ugun-Klusek A, Maruszczak KK, Kapolou K, Schmid B, Rapaport D, Ueffing M, Casadei N, Krüger R, Gasser T, Vogt Weisenhorn DM, Kahle PJ, Trautwein C, Gloeckner CJ, Fitzgerald JC. human dopaminergic neurons lacking PINK1 exhibit disrupted dopamine metabolism related to vitamin B6 co-factors. iScience. 2020;23:101797. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Camponeschi F, Ciofi-Baffoni S, Banci L. Anamorsin/Ndor1 complex reduces [2Fe-2S]-MitoNEET via a transient protein-protein interaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2017;139:9479–9482. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan NC, Salazar AM, Pham AH, Sweredoski MJ, Kolawa NJ, Graham RLJ, Hess S, Chan DC. Broad activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by Parkin is critical for mitophagy. Human Molecular Genetics. 2011;20:1726–1737. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen OS, Schalinske KL, Eisenstein RS. Dietary iron intake modulates the activity of iron regulatory proteins and the abundance of ferritin and mitochondrial aconitase in rat liver. The Journal of Nutrition. 1997;127:238–248. doi: 10.1093/jn/127.2.238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen PL, Huang KT, Cheng CY, Li JC, Chan HY, Lin TY, Su MP, Yang WY, Chang HC, Wang HD, Chen CH. Vesicular transport mediates the uptake of cytoplasmic proteins into mitochondria in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Communications. 2020;11:2592. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16335-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark IE, Dodson MW, Jiang C, Cao JH, Huh JR, Seol JH, Yoo SJ, Hay BA, Guo M. Drosophila pink1 is required for mitochondrial function and interacts genetically with parkin. Nature. 2006;441:1162–1166. doi: 10.1038/nature04779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Conlan AR, Paddock ML, Homer C, Axelrod HL, Cohen AE, Abresch EC, Zuris JA, Nechushtai R, Jennings PA. Mutation of the his ligand in mitoNEET stabilizes the 2Fe-2S cluster despite conformational heterogeneity in the ligand environment. Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography. 2011;67:516–523. doi: 10.1107/S0907444911011577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cunningham CN, Baughman JM, Phu L, Tea JS, Yu C, Coons M, Kirkpatrick DS, Bingol B, Corn JE. USP30 and parkin homeostatically regulate atypical ubiquitin chains on mitochondria. Nature Cell Biology. 2015;17:160–169. doi: 10.1038/ncb3097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dexter DT, Wells FR, Agid F, Agid Y, Lees AJ, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Increased nigral iron content in postmortem parkinsonian brain. Lancet. 1987;2:1219–1220. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91361-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dixon AS, Schwinn MK, Hall MP, Zimmerman K, Otto P, Lubben TH, Butler BL, Binkowski BF, Machleidt T, Kirkland TA, Wood MG, Eggers CT, Encell LP, Wood KV. NanoLuc complementation reporter optimized for accurate measurement of protein interactions in cells. ACS Chemical Biology. 2016;11:400–408. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Esposito G, Vos M, Vilain S, Swerts J, De Sousa Valadas J, Van Meensel S, Schaap O, Verstreken P. Aconitase causes iron toxicity in Drosophila pink1 mutants. PLOS Genetics. 2013;9:e1003478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferecatu I, Gonçalves S, Golinelli-Cohen MP, Clémancey M, Martelli A, Riquier S, Guittet E, Latour JM, Puccio H, Drapier JC, Lescop E, Bouton C. The diabetes drug target MitoNEET governs a novel trafficking pathway to rebuild an Fe-S cluster into cytosolic aconitase/iron regulatory protein 1. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289:28070–28086. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.548438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Galy B, Ferring-Appel D, Sauer SW, Kaden S, Lyoumi S, Puy H, Kölker S, Gröne HJ, Hentze MW. Iron regulatory proteins secure mitochondrial iron sufficiency and function. Cell Metabolism. 2010;12:194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gautier CA, Kitada T, Shen J. Loss of PINK1 causes mitochondrial functional defects and increased sensitivity to oxidative stress. PNAS. 2008;105:11364–11369. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802076105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Greene JC, Whitworth AJ, Andrews LA, Parker TJ, Pallanck LJ. Genetic and genomic studies of Drosophila parkin mutants implicate oxidative stress and innate immune responses in pathogenesis. Human Molecular Genetics. 2005;14:799–811. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Haile DJ, Rouault TA, Harford JB, Kennedy MC, Blondin GA, Beinert H, Klausner RD. Cellular regulation of the iron-responsive element binding protein: disassembly of the cubane iron-sulfur cluster results in high-affinity RNA binding. PNAS. 1992a;89:11735–11739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haile DJ, Rouault TA, Tang CK, Chin J, Harford JB, Klausner RD. Reciprocal control of RNA-binding and aconitase activity in the regulation of the iron-responsive element binding protein: role of the iron-sulfur cluster. PNAS. 1992b;89:7536–7540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ham SJ, Yoo H, Woo D, Lee DH, Park KS, Chung J. PINK1 and Parkin regulate IP3R-mediated ER calcium release. Nature Communications. 2023;14:5202. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40929-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hirsch EC, Brandel JP, Galle P, Javoy-Agid F, Agid Y. Iron and aluminum increase in the substantia nigra of patients with Parkinson’s disease: an X-ray microanalysis. Journal of Neurochemistry. 1991;56:446–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb08170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huynh N, Ou Q, Cox P, Lill R, King-Jones K. Glycogen branching enzyme controls cellular iron homeostasis via Iron Regulatory Protein 1 and mitoNEET. Nature Communications. 2019;10:5463. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13237-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jarazo J, Barmpa K, Modamio J, Saraiva C, Sabaté-Soler S, Rosety I, Griesbeck A, Skwirblies F, Zaffaroni G, Smits LM, Su J, Arias-Fuenzalida J, Walter J, Gomez-Giro G, Monzel AS, Qing X, Vitali A, Cruciani G, Boussaad I, Brunelli F, Jäger C, Rakovic A, Li W, Yuan L, Berger E, Arena G, Bolognin S, Schmidt R, Schröder C, Antony PMA, Klein C, Krüger R, Seibler P, Schwamborn JC. Parkinson’s disease phenotypes in patient neuronal cultures and brain organoids improved by 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin treatment. Movement Disorders. 2022;37:80–94. doi: 10.1002/mds.28810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jones MA, Amr S, Ferebee A, Huynh P, Rosenfeld JA, Miles MF, Davies AG, Korey CA, Warrick JM, Shiang R, Elsea SH, Girirajan S, Grotewiel M. Genetic studies in Drosophila and humans support a model for the concerted function of CISD2, PPT1 and CLN3 in disease. Biology Open. 2014;3:342–352. doi: 10.1242/bio.20147559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Karmi O, Marjault HB, Bai F, Roy S, Sohn YS, Darash Yahana M, Morcos F, Ioannidis K, Nahmias Y, Jennings PA, Mittler R, Onuchic JN, Nechushtai R. A VDAC1-mediated NEET protein chain transfers [2Fe-2S] clusters between the mitochondria and the cytosol and impacts mitochondrial dynamics. PNAS. 2022;119:e2121491119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2121491119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Key J, Sen NE, Arsović A, Krämer S, Hülse R, Khan NN, Meierhofer D, Gispert S, Koepf G, Auburger G. Systematic surveys of iron homeostasis mechanisms reveal ferritin superfamily and nucleotide surveillance regulation to be modified by PINK1 absence. Cells. 2020;9:2229. doi: 10.3390/cells9102229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim HY, LaVaute T, Iwai K, Klausner RD, Rouault TA. Identification of a conserved and functional iron-responsive element in the 5’-untranslated region of mammalian mitochondrial aconitase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996;271:24226–24230. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.39.24226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. LaVaute T, Smith S, Cooperman S, Iwai K, Land W, Meyron-Holtz E, Drake SK, Miller G, Abu-Asab M, Tsokos M, Switzer R, III, Grinberg A, Love P, Tresser N, Rouault TA. Targeted deletion of the gene encoding iron regulatory protein-2 causes misregulation of iron metabolism and neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature Genetics. 2001;27:209–214. doi: 10.1038/84859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lazarou M, Narendra DP, Jin SM, Tekle E, Banerjee S, Youle RJ. PINK1 drives Parkin self-association and HECT-like E3 activity upstream of mitochondrial binding. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2013;200:163–172. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201210111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee JJ, Sanchez-Martinez A, Martinez Zarate A, Benincá C, Mayor U, Clague MJ, Whitworth AJ. Basal mitophagy is widespread in Drosophila but minimally affected by loss of Pink1 or parkin. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2018;217:1613–1622. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201801044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ma L, Gholam Azad M, Dharmasivam M, Richardson V, Quinn RJ, Feng Y, Pountney DL, Tonissen KF, Mellick GD, Yanatori I, Richardson DR. Parkinson’s disease: Alterations in iron and redox biology as a key to unlock therapeutic strategies. Redox Biology. 2021;41:101896. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Martinez A, Lectez B, Ramirez J, Popp O, Sutherland JD, Urbé S, Dittmar G, Clague MJ, Mayor U. Quantitative proteomic analysis of Parkin substrates in Drosophila neurons. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2017;12:29. doi: 10.1186/s13024-017-0170-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Martinez A, Sanchez-Martinez A, Pickering JT, Twyning MJ, Terriente-Felix A, Chen PL, Chen CH, Whitworth AJ. Mitochondrial CISD1/Cisd accumulation blocks mitophagy and genetic or pharmacological inhibition rescues neurodegenerative phenotypes in Pink1/parkin models. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2024;19:12. doi: 10.1186/s13024-024-00701-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McWilliams TG, Barini E, Pohjolan-Pirhonen R, Brooks SP, Singh F, Burel S, Balk K, Kumar A, Montava-Garriga L, Prescott AR, Hassoun SM, Mouton-Liger F, Ball G, Hills R, Knebel A, Ulusoy A, Di Monte DA, Tamjar J, Antico O, Fears K, Smith L, Brambilla R, Palin E, Valori M, Eerola-Rautio J, Tienari P, Corti O, Dunnett SB, Ganley IG, Suomalainen A, Muqit MMK. Phosphorylation of Parkin at serine 65 is essential for its activation in vivo. Open Biology. 2018;8:180108. doi: 10.1098/rsob.180108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Michalke B, Willkommen D, Venkataramani V. Iron redox speciation analysis using capillary electrophoresis coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CE-ICP-MS) Frontiers in Chemistry. 2019;7:136. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mittler R, Darash-Yahana M, Sohn YS, Bai F, Song L, Cabantchik IZ, Jennings PA, Onuchic JN, Nechushtai R. NEET Proteins: A new link between iron metabolism, reactive oxygen species, and cancer. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2019;30:1083–1095. doi: 10.1089/ars.2018.7502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Narendra D, Tanaka A, Suen DF, Youle RJ. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2008;183:795–803. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200809125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Narendra D, Walker JE, Youle R. Mitochondrial quality control mediated by PINK1 and Parkin: links to parkinsonism. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2012;4:a011338. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Narendra DP, Wang C, Youle RJ, Walker JE. PINK1 rendered temperature sensitive by disease-associated and engineered mutations. Human Molecular Genetics. 2013;22:2572–2589. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Okatsu K, Iemura SI, Koyano F, Go E, Kimura M, Natsume T, Tanaka K, Matsuda N. Mitochondrial hexokinase HKI is a novel substrate of the Parkin ubiquitin ligase. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2012;428:197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Paddock ML, Wiley SE, Axelrod HL, Cohen AE, Roy M, Abresch EC, Capraro D, Murphy AN, Nechushtai R, Dixon JE, Jennings PA. MitoNEET is a uniquely folded 2Fe 2S outer mitochondrial membrane protein stabilized by pioglitazone. PNAS. 2007;104:14342–14347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707189104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Park J, Lee SB, Lee S, Kim Y, Song S, Kim S, Bae E, Kim J, Shong M, Kim JM, Chung J. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Drosophila PINK1 mutants is complemented by parkin. Nature. 2006;441:1157–1161. doi: 10.1038/nature04788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pickrell AM, Youle RJ. The Roles of PINK1, Parkin, and mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson’s disease. Neuron. 2015;85:257–273. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Polyansky AA, Chugunov AO, Volynsky PE, Krylov NA, Nolde DE, Efremov RG. PREDDIMER: a web server for prediction of transmembrane helical dimers. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:889–890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pyatigorskaya N, Sharman M, Corvol JC, Valabregue R, Yahia-Cherif L, Poupon F, Cormier-Dequaire F, Siebner H, Klebe S, Vidailhet M, Brice A, Lehéricy S. High nigral iron deposition in LRRK2 and Parkin mutation carriers using R2* relaxometry. Movement Disorders. 2015;30:1077–1084. doi: 10.1002/mds.26218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Reinhardt P, Glatza M, Hemmer K, Tsytsyura Y, Thiel CS, Höing S, Moritz S, Parga JA, Wagner L, Bruder JM, Wu G, Schmid B, Röpke A, Klingauf J, Schwamborn JC, Gasser T, Schöler HR, Sterneckert J. Derivation and expansion using only small molecules of human neural progenitors for neurodegenerative disease modeling. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e59252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Roberts ME, Crail JP, Laffoon MM, Fernandez WG, Menze MA, Konkle ME. Identification of disulfide bond formation between MitoNEET and glutamate dehydrogenase 1. Biochemistry. 2013;52:8969–8971. doi: 10.1021/bi401038w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rouault TA, Maio N. Biogenesis and functions of mammalian iron-sulfur proteins in the regulation of iron homeostasis and pivotal metabolic pathways. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2017;292:12744–12753. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R117.789537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sarraf SA, Raman M, Guarani-Pereira V, Sowa ME, Huttlin EL, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Landscape of the PARKIN-dependent ubiquitylome in response to mitochondrial depolarization. Nature. 2013;496:372–376. doi: 10.1038/nature12043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shulman JM, De Jager PL, Feany MB. Parkinson’s disease: genetics and pathogenesis. Annual Review of Pathology. 2011;6:193–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tan G, Liu D, Pan F, Zhao J, Li T, Ma Y, Shen B, Lyu J. His-87 ligand in mitoNEET is crucial for the transfer of iron sulfur clusters from mitochondria to cytosolic aconitase. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2016;470:226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Vernay A, Marchetti A, Sabra A, Jauslin TN, Rosselin M, Scherer PE, Demaurex N, Orci L, Cosson P. MitoNEET-dependent formation of intermitochondrial junctions. PNAS. 2017;114:8277–8282. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706643114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wan Z, Xu J, Huang Y, Zhai Y, Ma Z, Zhou B, Cao Z. Elevating bioavailable iron levels in mitochondria suppresses the defective phenotypes caused by PINK1 loss-of-function in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2020;532:285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang CH, Chen YF, Wu CY, Wu PC, Huang YL, Kao CH, Lin CH, Kao LS, Tsai TF, Wei YH. Cisd2 modulates the differentiation and functioning of adipocytes by regulating intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. Human Molecular Genetics. 2014;23:4770–4785. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Whitworth AJ, Theodore DA, Greene JC, Benes H, Wes PD, Pallanck LJ. Increased glutathione S-transferase activity rescues dopaminergic neuron loss in a Drosophila model of Parkinson’S disease. PNAS. 2005;102:8024–8029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501078102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wiley SE, Murphy AN, Ross SA, van der Geer P, Dixon JE. MitoNEET is an iron-containing outer mitochondrial membrane protein that regulates oxidative capacity. PNAS. 2007a;104:5318–5323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701078104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wiley SE, Paddock ML, Abresch EC, Gross L, van der Geer P, Nechushtai R, Murphy AN, Jennings PA, Dixon JE. The outer mitochondrial membrane protein mitoNEET contains a novel redox-active 2Fe-2S cluster. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007b;282:23745–23749. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C700107200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Youle RJ, Narendra DP. Mechanisms of mitophagy. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2011;12:9–14. doi: 10.1038/nrm3028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Sameh Ali 1

The study focuses on the role of CISD1 in Parkinson's disease (PD) and its relationship with the PINK1/Parkin pathway. The obtained data provide convincing evidence that apo-CISD1 may have a toxic function in Pink1 mutant flies and in dopaminergic neurons from patients with PINK1 mutation, thus serving as a critical mediator of Pink1-linked PD phenotypes. The findings provide valuable insights into the role of iron homeostasis and mitochondrial biology in PD.

Decision letter

Editor: Sameh Ali1

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

[Editors' note: this paper was reviewed by Review Commons.]

eLife. 2024 Aug 19;13:e97027. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97027.sa2

Author response


We thank the reviewers for their excellent work that greatly improved our work. We are very content that reviewer #1 considered our work to be “novel, interesting and important for understanding the mitochondrial biology of PD”. This reviewer also valued our work as “a significant advancement” and suggested further study of the relationship of CISD1 (dimerization) to general mitophagy/autophagy. We already addressed this in the first revision (version 1, v1).

Also reviewer #2 considered our work to be “an exciting and well-executed piece of research focusing on the defects in iron homeostasis observed in Parkinson's disease which a wide audience will appreciate”. This reviewer had a very specific suggestion on how to improve our manuscript which makes a lot of sense and is feasible. As the suggested experiments include fly breeding and behavioral analysis, these experiments took some time and are now included in the second revision (version 2, v2).

Finally, reviewer #3 gathered that parts of our results “are confirmatory to recently published work” but also appreciated that our results established that iron-depleted apo-Cisd is an important determinant of toxicity which has not been shown before. I would like to comment here, that in contrast to the paper mentioned by this reviewer, our contribution includes data from dopaminergic neurons obtained from human patients suffering from familial Parkinson’s disease that demonstrate the same increase in apo-CISD1 levels as the flies.

We also made additional changes in v2 not requested by the reviewers. New Figure 3E/F now demonstrates that the CISD1 dimer consists of two monomers that are covalently linked by a disulfide bridge. This is important because in this conformation CISD1 cannot coordinate the iron-sulfur cofactor. This work was done by an additional author, Eva-Maria Hanschmann (University of Essen, Germany), who is an expert in the field of redox modifications. We also decided to remove former Figure 3 showing the effect of apoCISD1 in mouse embryonic fibroblasts for clarity and brevity.

Reviewer #1 (Evidence, reproducibility and clarity (Required)):

Summary:

The manuscript focuses on mitochondrial CISD1 and its relationship to two Parkinson's disease (PD) proteins PINK1 and Parkin. Interestingly, CISD1 is a mitochondrial iron sulfur binding protein and an target of Parkin-mediated ubiquitinylation. Disruption of iron metabolism and accumulation of iron in the brain has long since been reported in PD but the involvement of iron sulfur binding is little studied both in vivo and in human stem cell models of PD. This work addresses the relationship between CISD1 and two mitochondrial models of PD (PINK1 and Parkin) making use of in vivo models (Drosophila), PINK1 patient models (iPSC derived neurons) and Mouse fibroblasts. The authors report a complex relationship between CISD1, PINK1 and Parkin, where iron-depleted CISD1 may illicit a toxic gain of function downstream of PINK1 and Parkin.

Major comments:

The conclusions are overall modest and supported by the data. One question remains unaddressed. Is mitochondrial CISD1 a downstream target that specifically mediates PINK1 and Parkin loss of function phenotypes or are the phenotypes being mediated because CISD1 is downstream of mitophagy in general?

It would be interesting to know what happens to CISD1 (dimerization?) upon initiation of mitophagy in wild type cells? Would dissipation of mitochondrial membrane potential be sufficient to induce changes to CISD1 in wild type cells or PINK1 deficient cells? Since iron chelation is a potent inducer of mitophagy (Loss of iron triggers PINK1/Parkin-independent mitophagy. George F G Allen, Rachel Toth, John James, Ian G Ganley. EMBO Reports (2013)14:1127-1135) it would be useful to show one experiment addressing the role of CISD1 dimerization under mitochondrial depolarizing and non-depolarizing conditions in cells.

Based on the overall assumption of the reviewer that our work is “novel, interesting and important for understanding the mitochondrial biology of PD” and “a significant advancement” we understand the word “modest” here as meaning “not exaggerated”. To address this question, we studied CISD1 dimerization in response to more classical activators of mitophagy namely FCCP and antimycin/oligomycin which had no significant effect on dimerization suggesting that this phenotype is more pronounced under iron depletion. These data are shown in the new Figure 2C.

Alternatively, the authors should discuss the topic of mitophagy (including PINK1-parkin independent mitophagy), the limitation of the present study not being able to rule out a general mitophagy effect and previous work on the role of iron depletion on mitophagy induction in the manuscript.

The data and the methods are presented in such a way that they can be reproduced.

The experiments are adequately replicated and statistical analysis is adequate.

Minor comments:

Show p values even when not significant (ns) since even some of the significant findings are borderline < p0.05.

Here, I decided to leave it as it is, because the figures became very cluttered and less easy to understand. Borderline findings are however indicated and mentioned in the text.

Because the situation for CISD1 is complicated (overexpression, different models etc.) it would be helpful if in the abstract the authors could summarize the role. E.g. as in the discussion that iron-depleted CISD1 could represent a toxic function.

The abstract has been completely rewritten and now mentions the potential toxic function of iron-depleted CISD1.

If there is sufficient iron (accumulation in PD) why would CISD1 be deactivated? Perhaps that could be postulated or discussed in a simplified way?

We actually think that apo-CISD1 without its iron/sulfur cluster is incapable of transferring its Fe/S cluster to IRP1 and IRP2. This then results in increased levels of apo-IRP1/2 and subsequent changes that lead to iron overload. Such a sequence of events would place CISD1 upstream of the changes in iron homeostasis observed in PD and models of PD. This is now discussed in more detail.

In the methods section both reducing and non-reducing gel/Western blotting is mentioned but the manuscript only describes data from blots under reducing conditions. Are there blots under non-reducing conditions that could be shown to see how CISD1 and dimerized CISD1 resolve?

We now show blots where we used extremely reducing conditions of prolonged incubation with higher concentrations of DTT and tris-(2-carboxyethyl)-phosphine as a disulfide-bond breaking agent followed by boiling. This resulted in loss of dimeric and an increase of monomeric Cisd (new Figure 3E). We also added the thiol alkylating agent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) prior and during lysis and performed non-reducing immunoblotting in old Pink1B9 flies compared to old wildtype flies. NEM blocks all reduced sulfhydryl (-SH) groups of cysteine residues and thereby prevents the formation of disulfide bonds due to non-specific oxidation during the lysis process (new Figure 3F). We also observed the increased dimer formation in old Pink1B9 flies under these conditions (new Figure 3F). Together these experiments indicate that the increased dimerization in old Pink1B9 flies is most probably caused by the formation of an intermolecular disulfide linking two Cisd molecules.

In the Results section, PINK1 mutant flies, it is said that the alterations to CISD1 (dimerization) are analogous to the PINK1 mutation patient neurons. The effect is seen in old but not young flies. Since iPSC-derived neurons are relatively young in the dish, would one not expect that young flies and iPSC-derived neurons have similar CISD1 phenotypes? Could the authors modify the text to reflect that? or discuss the finding in further context.

We only studied one time point in PINK1 mutation patient neurons and controls. It would indeed be interesting whether neuronal aging (as far as this can be studied in the dish) would result in increased CISD1 dimerization. This is now discussed.

Reviewer #1 (Significance (Required)):

The strengths of this work are in the novelty of the topic and the use of several well established in vivo and cell models including patient-derived neurons. The findings discussed in the text are honest and avoid over-interpretation. The findings are novel, interesting and important for understanding the mitochondrial biology of PD.

We thank the reviewer for their kind words.

Limitations include the lack of strong phenotypes in the CISD1 models and the lack of robust, sustained and consistent increase in CISD1 dimers in the patient and fly models (just significant because of variability). The relationship of CISD1 (dimerization) to general mitophagy/autophagy is not shown here.

The lack of a strong phenotype in Cisd-deficient flies could actually hint to a potential compensatory mechanism that could also protect the Pink1 mutant x Cisd-deficient double-knockout flies. It is correct that the increase in CISD1/Cisd dimers in the PD models are not overwhelming but – as also mentioned by the reviewer – this could be increased in “older” cultures. This is discussed in more detail. We have now reproduced the increased dimerization of Cisd in samples where we added the thiol alkylating agent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) prior and during lysis and performed non-reducing immunoblotting in old Pink1B9 flies compared to old wildtype flies. NEM blocks all reduced sulfhydryl (-SH) groups of cysteine residues and thereby prevents the formation of disulfide bonds due to non-specific oxidation during the lysis process (new Figure 3F). We also observed the increased dimer formation in old Pink1B9 flies under these conditions (new Figure 3F). Together these experiments indicate that the increased dimerization in old Pink1B9 flies is most probably caused by the formation of an intermolecular disulfide linking two Cisd molecules. As suggested by the reviewer, we have now added experiments that study the relationship between CISD1 dimerization and conventional mitophagy as described above (new Figure 2C).

There is a significant advancement. So far researchers were able to describe the importance of iron metabolism in PD (For example refer to work from the group of Georg Auburger such as PMID 33023155 and discussion of therapeutic intervention such as reviewed by Ma et al. PMID: 33799121) but few papers describe involvement of iron sulfur cluster proteins specifically (such as Aconitase) in relation to PINK1 and parkin (these are cited). The fact that CISD1 is a protein of the mitochondrial outer membrane makes it particularly interesting and further studies looking more closely at the interaction of CISD1 with mitochondrial proteins associated with PD will be of interest.

We thank the reviewer for pointing out these excellent publications. Key et al. present an enormous wealth of data on protein dysregulation of wildtype and Pink1-/- fibroblast cell lines upon perturbation of the iron homeostasis (Key et al., 2020). Both cell lines exhibit a downregulation of CISD1 levels upon iron deprivation with the agent 2,2′ -Bipyridine possibly as a compensatory mechanism to limit the toxic gain of function of iron-depleted CISD1. The other paper, Ma et al. is a recent review on changes in iron homeostasis in PD and PD models (Ma et al., 2021). Both papers are now cited in the manuscript.

Reviewer #2 (Evidence, reproducibility and clarity (Required)):

Summary:

In the paper entitled 'Mitochondrial CISD1 is a downstream target that mediates PINK1 and Parkin loss-of-function phenotypes', Bitar and co-workers investigate the interaction between CISD1 and the PINK1/Parkin pathway. Mutations in PINK1 and PARKIN cause early onset Parkinson's disease and CISD1 is a homodimeric mitochondrial iron-sulphur binding protein. They observed an increase in CISD1 dimer formation in dopaminergic neurons derived from Parkinson's disease patients carrying a PINK1 mutation. Immuno-blots of cells expressing CISD1 mutants that affects the iron sulphur cluster binding and as well as cells treated with iron chelators, showed that the tendency of CISD1 to form dimers is dependent on its binding to iron-sulphur clusters. Moreover, the Iron-depleted apo-CISD1 does not rescue mitochondrial phenotypes observed in CISD1 KO mouse cells. Finally, in vivo studies showed that overexpression of Cisd and mutant apo-Cisd in Drosophila shortened fly life span and, using a different overexpression model, apo-Cisd caused a delay in eclosion. Similar as patient derived neurons, they observed an increase in Cisd dimer levels in Pink1 mutant flies. Additionally, the authors showed that double mutants of Cisd and Pink1 alleviated all Pink1 mutant phenotypes, while double mutants of Prkn and Cisd rescued most Prkn mutant phenotypes.

Major comments:

The authors observed an increase in the levels of Cisd dimers in Pink1 mutant flies and removing Cisd in Pink1 mutant background rescues all the mutant phenotypes observed in Pink1 mutant flies, suggesting that the Cisd dimers are part and partial of the Pink1 mutant phenotype. The authors also generated a UAS_C111S_Cisd fly which can overexpress apo-Cisd. Overexpression of the C111S_Cisd construct with Tub-Gal4 showed a developmental delay. Since apo-Cisd forms more dimeric Cisd, my question is: does the strong overexpression (e.g. with Tub-Gal4) of the C111S_Cisd in wild type flies shows any of the Pink1 mutant phenotypes? If not, the authors should mention this and elaborate on it.

We thank the reviewer for their comments. We have exchanged these data with completely new data where we compared the effects of mild ubiquitous overexpression of mitochondrially targeted GFP with wildtype and mutant Cisd in wildtype and Pink1 mutant flies. We chose negative geotaxis (the ability to climb) and lifespan – known hallmarks of the Pink1B9 phenotype – as readouts and found that Pink1B9 flies have reduced negative geotaxis and lifespan as expected. Ubiquitous overexpression of Cisd and apo-Cisd aggravated these phenotypes in wildtype and Pink1 mutant flies (new Figure 4A). Cisd C111S overexpression was, however, associated with a more profound reduction in climbing speed compared to wildtype Cisd, while the effects on lifespan were similarly detrimental (new Figure 4A). Additionally, the vast majority of all Cisd C111S-overexpressing flies were not capable of inflating their wings (new Figure 4B), a rather non-specific phenotype which can result from genetic mutations, environmental conditions, and developmental defects. This phenotype did not occur in wildtype Cisd or mitoGFP-overexpressing flies (new Figure 4B).

Figure 6g: Shows the TEM pictures of the indirect flight muscles of Pink1 mutant flies and Pink1, Cisd double mutants. To me, the Picture of Pink1 mutant mitochondria is not very convincing. We expect swollen (enlarged) mitochondria with disrupted mitochondrial matrix. However, this is not clear in the picture. Moreover, in my opinion, Figure6 g, is missing an EM Picture of the Cisd mutant indirect flight muscles.

We now show exemplary pictures from Pink1 mutant and DKO in a higher magnification which better demonstrate the rounded Pink1 mutant mitochondria and the disrupted cristae structure. EM pictures of all four genotypes in different magnifications are now shown in new Figure 5 —figure supplement 4.

OPTIONAL: The authors suggest that most probably apo-Cisd, assumes a toxic function in Pink1 mutant flies and serves as a critical mediator of Pink1-linked phenotypes. If this statement is correct, we can hypothesize that increasing apo-Cisd in Pink1 mutant background should worsen the pink1 mutant defects.

Therefore, I suggest overexpressing Cisd1 wild type (and/or C111S Cisd) in pink1 mutant flies, as pink1 is on the X chromosome, and mild overexpression of Cisd1 with da is not lethal, these experiments could be done in 3-4 fly crosses and hence within 1.5 – 2 months.

We have now done this experiment as mentioned above (new Figure 4).

Since Pink1 mutant flies contain higher levels of endogenous Cisd dimers, we can expect that overexpression of wild type Cisd will result in an even stronger increase of dimers. If these dimers indeed contribute to Pink1 mutant phenotypes we can expect that overexpression of Cisd will result in a worsening of the Pink1 mutant phenotypes.

We have now done this experiment as mentioned above and observed what the reviewer suspected (new Figure 4).

Minor Comments:

In the Introduction (Background) there are some parts without references:

E.g., there is not a single reference in the following part between

'However, in unfit mitochondria with a reduced mitochondrial membrane potential …&… compromised mitochondria safeguards overall mitochondrial health and function.'

We thank the reviewer for pointing out this flaw. We have now added a suitable reference to the introduction.

In the introduction there is some confusion about the nomenclature used in the article: e.g. following comments are made in the text: Cisd2 (in this publication referred to as Dosmit) or fly Cisd2 (in this publication named MitoNEET).

However, the names Dosmit and MitoNEET do not appear in the manuscript (except in references)

The literature and nomenclature for CISD1 are indeed confusing. We have now revised the introduction.

Figure 1: I am not sure why some gels are shown in this figure. The two last lanes of figure 1c are redundant and Figure 1c' which is also not mentioned in the text, is also a repetition of figure 1c.

The blots in 1c and 1c’ represent all data points (different patients and different individual differentiations) shown in the quantification in 1d. This is now explained better in the revised manuscript.

The authors mention in material and methods that T2A sites are used at the C-terminus of CISD1 to avoid tagging of CISD1. However, this is not entirely true as T2A will leave some amino acids (around 20) after the self-cleaving and therefore CISD1 will be tagged.

This is indeed true and we have now changed the wording in the revised manuscript.

In figure 5 P1 is used to abbreviate Pink1 mutants, however P1, to me, refers to pink1 wild type. It would be clearer to abbreviate Pink1 mutants as P1B9 in the graphs as B9 is the name of the mutant pink1 allele.

We thank the reviewer for pointing out this flaw. We have now altered Figure 5 to be clearer.

In figure 7: Parkin is abbreviated both as Prkn and as Park

We thank the reviewer for pointing out this flaw, we indeed mixed up both names because it is complicated. The gene symbol is Prkn, the fly line is called Park25. We have now clarified this in the text and new Figure 6.

I suggest changing the title. Recently an article (Ham et al., 2023 PMID: 37626046) was published showing similar genetic interactions between Pink1/Prkn and Cisd. However, the article of Ham et al., 2023 was focused on Pink1/Prkn regulation of ER calcium release, while this article is more related to iron homeostasis. I suggest that the title shows this distinction.

This is indeed a very good suggestion. We have now altered the title to “Iron/sulfur cluster loss of mitochondrial CISD1 mediates PINK1 loss-of-function phenotypes”.

Reviewer #2 (Significance (Required)):

In general, this is an exciting and well-executed piece of research focusing on the defects in iron homeostasis observed in Parkinson's disease which a wide audience will appreciate. Very recently, a similar genetic interaction between Cisd and Pink1/Prkn in flies was published (Ham et al., 2023 PMID: 37626046) however, from a different angle. While, Ham et al. focused on the role of Pink1/Prkn and Cisd in IP3R related ER calcium release, this manuscript approaches the Pink1/Prkn – Cisd interaction from an iron homeostasis point of view. Since, iron dysregulation contributes to the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease, the observations in this manuscript are relevant for the disease. Hence, the work is sufficiently novel and deserves publication. However, additional experiments are suggested to strengthen the authors' conclusions.

We thank the reviewer for their kind words. As mentioned above, these additional experiments are now included in our revised manuscript (v2).

I work on Drosophila models of Parkinson's disease

Referees cross-commenting

I agree with the reviewer number 1 that it would be interesting to investigate CISD1 dimerisation status during mitophagy.

As mentioned above, we now studied CISD1 dimerization in response to more classical activators of mitophagy namely FCCP and antimycin/oligomycin which had no significant effect on dimerization suggesting that this phenotype is more pronounced under iron depletion. These data are shown in the new Figure 2C.

Reviewer #3 (Evidence, reproducibility and clarity (Required)):

Here the authors provide evidence that Cisd is downstream of Parkin/Pink1 and suggest that the levels of apo-Cisd correlate with neurotoxicity. The data presented generally supports the conclusions of the authors and will be useful to those in the field. The manuscript would be improved by a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the study and more circumspection in interpretation of data.

We thank the reviewer for their comments aimed to improve our manuscript. We have now discussed the strengths and weaknesses of our study in more detail.

Introduction. While iron has been implicated in Parkinson's disease, it is an overstatement to say that disruption in iron metabolism contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of the disease.

There is certainly a plethora of data implicating perturbed iron homeostasis in PD as also pointed out by reviewer #1. We have tried to tone down our wording in the text and added a recent review on the topic (Ma et al., 2021) as also suggested by reviewer #1.

Introduction. The discussion of the various names for Cisd2 is important, but confusing as written. Specifically, the use of "this" makes the wording unclear.

We thank the reviewer for pointing out this flaw. We have altered the wording in the introduction.

Methods. It would be preferable to use heterozygous driver lines or a more similar genetic control rather than w-1118.

We have exchanged these data with completely new data where we compared the effects of mild ubiquitous overexpression of mitochondrially targeted GFP with wildtype and mutant Cisd in wildtype and Pink1 mutant flies. We chose negative geotaxis (the ability to climb) and lifespan – known hallmarks of the Pink1B9 phenotype – as readouts and found that Pink1B9 flies have reduced negative geotaxis and lifespan as expected. Ubiquitous overexpression of Cisd and apo-Cisd aggravated these phenotypes in wildtype and Pink1 mutant flies (new Figure 4A). Cisd C111S overexpression was, however, associated with a more profound reduction in climbing speed compared to wildtype Cisd, while the effects on lifespan were similarly detrimental (new Figure 4A). Additionally, the vast majority of all Cisd C111S-overexpressing flies were not capable of inflating their wings (new Figure 4B), a rather non-specific phenotype which can result from genetic mutations, environmental conditions, and developmental defects. This phenotype did not occur in wildtype Cisd or mitoGFP-overexpressing flies (new Figure 4B).

The data shown in Figure 5, 6, and 7 all used w1118 as control because all other fly strains are on the same genetic background.

Page 10. It appears that the PINK1 lines have been described previously. The authors should clarify this point and ensure that the new data presented in the current manuscript (presumably the mRNA levels, Figure 1a) is indicated, as well as data that is confirmatory of prior findings (Figure 1b).

Yes, these PINK1 lines have been described previously as pointed out in the manuscript. The original paper did not quantify the PINK1 mRNA levels shown in Figure 1a. The blots shown in Figure 1b are from new differentiations and have also not been shown before but confirm findings published in Jarazo et al. (Jarazo et al., 2022). This has been clarified in the revised version of our manuscript.

Figure 3 legend. There is a typographical error, "ne-way ANOVA."

We thank the reviewer for pointing out this flaw. This has been corrected in the revised version.

Page 15. The nature of the Pink1-B9 mutant should be specified.

We now added a figure 3 —figure supplement 1 that depicts the specific mutation in these flies.

Figure 4. Levels of mutant and wild type Cisd should be compared in transgenic flies.

Levels of Cisd expressed in da>>Cisd C111S are lower than in flies overexpressing wildtype Cisd or mitoGFP which probably reflects enhanced degradation. Because we now used mitoGFP as a control, we did not follow up on this.

Figure 5b,d. The striking change seems to be the decrease in dimers in young Pink1 mutant animals, not the small increase in dimers in the older Pink1 mutants.

It is always difficult to find a “typical” picture that reflects all changes observed in quantitative data. This Figure actually shows a decrease of total Cisd levels in young flies in Figure 5c but no difference of the dimer/monomer ratio in Figure 5d. These data are now shown in Figure 3. We also added new supporting data in new Figure 3E and F.

Figure 5f. Caution should be used in interpreting the results. Deferiprone has toxicity to wildtype flies (trend) and may simply be making sick Pink1 mutants sicker.

There is certainly a tendency for wildtype flies to thrive less in food containing deferiprone. To make this more obvious, we have now added the exact p value (0.0764, which we don’t consider borderline but a tendency) to this figure and mention this fact in the text.

Figure 5e. The data are hard to interpret. The number of animals is very small for a viability study and the strains are apparently in different genetic backgrounds, though this is not clearly specified. The experiment in Supplementary Figure 1 appears better controlled and supports the Pink1 data; however, a similar concern pertains to Figure 7. The authors may thus wish to be more circumspect in their interpretation, especially of the Parkin data.

In Figure 5e we quantified total iron levels and the Fe3+/Fe2+ ratio using capillary electrophoresis-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CE-ICP-MS). Although indeed not so many flies were used in this quantification, the results are highly significant. If the reviewer was referring to Figure 5f, we agree that this experiment was not well (to be honest, even wrongly explained) which we corrected in the revised version of this manuscript. We thank the reviewer for pointing out this flaw.

Reviewer #3 (Significance (Required)):

The major significance of the study is in putting downstream of Parkin/Pink1 (largely confirmatory to recently published work) and suggesting that the levels of apo-Cisd are an important determinant of toxicity. The work will be of interest to those in the field.

Description of analyses that authors prefer not to carry out

All changes suggested by the reviewers were addressed (v1) or will be addressed (v2).

References

Jarazo J, Barmpa K, Modamio J, Saraiva C, Sabaté-Soler S, Rosety I, Griesbeck A, Skwirblies F, Zaffaroni G, Smits LM, et al. (2022) Parkinson’s Disease Phenotypes in Patient Neuronal Cultures and Brain Organoids Improved by 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin Treatment. Mov Disord 37: 80–94

Key J, Sen NE, Arsović A, Krämer S, Hülse R, Khan NN, Meierhofer D, Gispert S, Koepf G & Auburger G (2020) Systematic Surveys of Iron Homeostasis Mechanisms Reveal Ferritin Superfamily and Nucleotide Surveillance Regulation to be Modified by PINK1 Absence. Cells 9

Ma L, Gholam Azad M, Dharmasivam M, Richardson V, Quinn RJ, Feng Y, Pountney DL, Tonissen KF, Mellick GD, Yanatori I, et al. (2021) Parkinson’s disease: Alterations in iron and redox biology as a key to unlock therapeutic strategies. Redox Biol 41: 101896

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots of iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons from PD patients carrying the PINK1 Q456X with their gene corrected controls.
    Figure 1—source data 2. Raw data of PCR and immunoblot quantifications of Figure 1.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Immunoblots of WT MEF cells treated with deferiprone or vehicle.
    Figure 2—source data 2. Raw data of the dimerization assays in Figure 2.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots of young and old wildtype and Pink1B9 flies blotted against CISD1 or actin as well as flies treated with or without NEM or DTT.
    Figure 3—source data 2. Raw data of PCR and immublotting and iron measurments quantification as well as flies eclosion from Figure 3.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw and labeled gels from a gel electrophoresis validating Pink1 knockout flies.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Raw data of the quantification of the Pink1 knockout flies.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Raw data of the quantification of climbing and lifespan and wing phenotype as well as quantitative PCR anaylsis of flies overexpressing Cisd or CS mutant on wildtype or Pink1B9 background.
    Figure 4—source data 2. Image of flies under the microscope to show the uninflated wing phenotype in the flies overexpressing the CS mutant on a Pink1B9 background.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots of wildtype and Cisd knockout flies probed against CISD1 and Actin.
    Figure 5—source data 2. Raw data of quantifications of climbing and wing posture and survival and dopamine levels and mitochondrial EM parameters of wildtype and CisdKO and Pink1B9 and doubleknockout flies.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots showing Cisd knockdown in flies.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Excel file containing raw data of the quantification of the blot showing Cisd KD as well as survival curve of Pink1B9 hemizygous flies.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Raw data from climbing and survival of wildtype and CisdKO flies.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots against CISD1 in fly strains wildtype and CisdKO and Pink and Park mutant flies and double knockout flies.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 3—source data 2. Raw and labeled blots of indicated fly strains blotted against CISD1.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Labeled image of transmission electron microscopy from flies’ flight muscle of indicated strains.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 4—source data 2. Raw transmission electron microscopy images with scale bar from flight muscle of indicated strains.
    Figure 6—source data 1. Raw and labeled blots of CISD1 expression in wildtype and Park25 flies.
    Figure 6—source data 2. Raw data of the quantification of quantitative PCR anaylsis and immunoblot analysis and climbing assay and wing posture and survival of wildtype and Park25 and dKO flies.
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES