Table 4. Analysis of fecal samples from the four groups of rats at the phylum level of intestinal flora.
| Group | Fusobacteria | Actinobacteria | Fibrobacteres | Euryarchaeota | Cyanobacteria | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic group A (GY) (%) | 0.10±0.03 | 1.85±0.72 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 | 
| Probiotic group B (JG) (%) | 0.07±0.03 | 1.55±0.48 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 | 0.02±0.00 | 
| Control group (KB) (%) | 0.07±0.01 | 1.16±0.50 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.03±0.00 | 
| Model group (MX) (%) | 0.08±0.02 | 1.29±0.33 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 | 
| t value | |||||
| KB vs. GY | 2.714 | 2.483 | −2.656 | −4.132 | −4.311 | 
| KB vs. JG | 0.121 | 1.810 | −2.789 | −3.866 | −3.435 | 
| GY vs. JG | 2.110 | 1.076 | −0.329 | −0.455 | −1.443 | 
| MX vs. GY | 1.934 | 2.192 | −1.542 | −1.510 | −3.014 | 
| MX vs. JG | −0.498 | 1.398 | −1.420 | −1.130 | −1.921 | 
| KB vs. MX | −0.828 | −0.727 | 0.978 | 2.441 | 1.208 | 
| P value | |||||
| KB vs. GY | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 
| KB vs. JG | 0.91 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 
| GY vs. JG | 0.049 | 0.30 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 
| MX vs. GY | 0.07 | 0.048 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.007 | 
| MX vs. JG | 0.62 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 
| KB vs. MX | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.34 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 
Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Control group (KB): fed with water; model group (MX): fed with 5% DSS to induce acute diarrhea; probiotic group A (GY): acute diarrhea model fed with Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Saccharomyces boulardii at the same time; probiotics group B (JG): acute diarrhea model fed with Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Saccharomyces boulardii at 2-hour interval. DSS, dextran sodium sulfate.