Table 5. Analysis of fecal samples from the four groups of rats at the genus level of intestinal flora.
| Group | Akkermansia | Prevotella | Lactobacillus | Oscillibacter | Roseburia | Lachnoclostridium | Ruminococcus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic group A (GY) (%) | 1.95±2.43 | 0.01±0.00 | 3.91±3.59 | 2.85±2.61 | 3.25±1.81 | 1.41±0.52 | 3.66±1.43 |
| Probiotic group B (JG) (%) | 0.64±0.97 | 0.01±0.01 | 2.65±2.02 | 3.82±2.85 | 2.80±1.07 | 1.77±0.59 | 4.75±1.49 |
| Control group (KB) (%) | 0.31±0.36 | 0.11±0.11 | 0.41±0.49 | 6.96±2.83 | 5.88±2.87 | 2.20±0.67 | 4.50±2.38 |
| Model group (MX) (%) | 0.48±0.63 | 0.06±0.12 | 1.25±1.41 | 4.04±2.07 | 3.67±2.08 | 1.59±0.31 | 7.82±2.89 |
| t value | |||||||
| KB vs. GY | 2.125 | −3.001 | 3.053 | −3.371 | −2.447 | −2.929 | −0.952 |
| KB vs. JG | 1.002 | −2.963 | 3.404 | −2.471 | −3.177 | −1.509 | 0.288 |
| GY vs. JG | 1.597 | −0.669 | 0.967 | −0.794 | 0.677 | −1.428 | −1.672 |
| MX vs. GY | 1.856 | −1.351 | 2.186 | −1.125 | −0.476 | −0.945 | −4.079 |
| MX vs. JG | 0.414 | −1.318 | 1.806 | −0.193 | −1.171 | 0.830 | −2.982 |
| KB vs. MX | −0.775 | 1.011 | −1.752 | 2.635 | 1.974 | 2.590 | −2.806 |
| P value | |||||||
| KB vs. GY | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.009 | 0.35 |
| KB vs. JG | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.02 | 0.008 | 0.15 | 0.78 |
| GY vs. JG | 0.13 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 0.11 |
| MX vs. GY | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.050 | 0.28 | 0.64 | 0.36 | 0.001 |
| MX vs. JG | 0.68 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.85 | 0.26 | 0.42 | 0.01 |
| KB vs. MX | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Control group (KB): fed with water; model group (MX): fed with 5% DSS to induce acute diarrhea; probiotic group A (GY): acute diarrhea model fed with Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Saccharomyces boulardii at the same time; probiotics group B (JG): acute diarrhea model fed with Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Saccharomyces boulardii at 2-hour interval.