Table 2.
Characteristics of animal studies included in the systematic review of the effects of ginseng and ginsenosides on ADHD.
| First author, Year | Species (Sample size (E/C)) | Age range or mean age | Model | Weight | Experimental group | Control group | Outcome measure - Behavioral tests |
Outcome measure - Biochemical analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal studies | ||||||||
| Nam, 2014 | ICR mice (E/C1/C2/C3 = 10/10/10/10)(M/F = 20/20) | Postnatal day 21 | PCB-exposed model | Not reported | Ginsenoside Rg3 + terpenoid-strengthened Ginkgo biloba 200 mg/kg, p.o., qd, 15 d | C1 PCB + Vehicle, 15 d C2 PCB + Methylphenidate 5 mg/kg, i.p., qd, 15 d C3 PCB + K252a 0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg, i.p., qd, 15 d |
Open-field test
|
prefrontal cortex BDNF↑, p-TrkB↑ (vs C1, C3) DAT↑, NET↑ (vs C1, C3) ROS↓, Protein carbonyl↓, MDA↓ (vs C1, C3) |
| Hu, 2012 | Rats (E/C1/C2/C3 = 8/8/8/8)(M/F = 16/0) | 11 wk | Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) model | E: 285–310 g C: 180–220 g |
Ginsenoside Rg1 40 mg/kg, p.o., qd, 14 d | C1 WKY rats C2 SHR rats C3 SHR + Methylphenidate 5 mg/kg, p.o., qd, 14 d |
None |
Prefrontal cortex Dopamine↑, Norepinephrine n.s. (vs C2) Striatum Dopamine↑, Norepinephrine n.s. (vs C2) |
| Kim, 2010 | Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (E/C1/C2/C3 = 8/8/8/8)(M/F = 16/0) | 3 wk | Neonatal hypoxia-induced hyperactivity model | Not reported | KRG extract 200 mg/kg, p.o., qd, 7 d | C1 neonatal hypoxia + Vehicle, p.o., qd, 7 d C2 control + Vehicle, p.o., qd, 7 d C3 control + KRG extract 200 mg/kg, p.o., qd, 7 d |
Open-field test Total arena
|
Forebrain NET↓ (vs C1) |
BDNF, Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; C, Control group; DAT, Dopamine transporter; E, Experimental group; F, Female; KRG, Korean Red Ginseng; M, Male; MDA, Malondialdehyde; n.s., Not significant; NET, Norepinephrine transporter; p-TrkB, Phosphorylated tropomyosin receptor kinase B; PCB, Polychlorinated biphenyls; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; WKY, Wistar Kyoto.
Statistical analysis of the outcomes in animal studies showed between-group differences compared to the negative control group.