Table 6.
Summary of key findings.
| Authors | Key findings |
|---|---|
| Venkatesh et al. [36] | Developed a system architecture to integrate blockchain technology, IoT, and big data analytics for social sustainability traceability. |
| Govindan et al. [59] | Proposed a framework of social sustainability linking drivers, issues, barriers, tensions, practices, and performances. |
| Jabbour et al. [72] | Suggested a method to develop the body of knowledge in multi-tier supply chain sustainability. |
| Bappy et al. [64] | Proposed a framework for measuring sustainability efficiency |
| Bag et al. [62] | Proposed a framework for sustainability enablers |
| Yildiz Çankaya and Sezen [57] | Investigated the impact of various GSCM practices on different performance dimensions. |
| Gardner et al. [75] | Presented a model to improve sustainability. |
| Krishnan et al. [73] | Proposed a framework for measuring sustainability efficiency |
| Xu et al. [77] | Proposed a framework for assessing sustainability risks |
| D'Eusanio et al. [78] | Developed a toolbox to measure sustainability performance |
| Hosseini-Motlagh et al. [76] | Presented a model to improve sustainability. |
| Zavala-Alcívar et al. [80] | Developed a conceptual framework to manage resilience and improve sustainability. |
| Kalantary et al. [81] | Introduced a model to assess the sustainability of supply chains over multiple periods. |
| Cabernard et al. [74] | Proposed a framework for measuring sustainability efficiency |
| Neri et al. [82] | Developed sustainability-related KPIs |
| Hannibal and Kauppi [67] | Highlighted the challenges of sustainability. |
| Baghizadeh [63] | Presented a model to minimize costs and maximize social benefits. |