Table 3.

Number (and proportion) of interpretations that proceeded through every possible combination of detection (yes, no), recognizing importance (yes, no), recognizing features (yes, no), and achieving an accurate diagnosis (yes, no)

Row no.	Detecting region	Recognizing relevance	Describing features	Diagnosing accurately	Frequency (proportion)
1	YES	YES	YES	YES	299 (0.28)
2	YES	NO	YES		102 (0.09)
3	YES	YES	NO		28 (0.03)
4	NO	NO	YES		17 (0.02)
5	YES	NO	NO		15 (0.01)
6	NO	NO	NO		7 (0.01)
7	NO	YES	NO		0 (0)
8	NO	YES	YES		0 (0)
9	YES	YES	NO	NO	234 (0.22)
10	YES	YES	YES		164 (0.15)
11	YES	NO	NO		93 (0.09)
12	YES	NO	YES		77 (0.07)
13	NO	NO	YES		26 (0.02)
14	NO	NO	NO		11 (0.01)
15	NO	YES	NO		2 (0)
16	NO	YES	YES		0 (0)

Combinations ending with an accurate diagnosis are presented first (rows 1–8), ordered from most to least frequent. These are followed by combinations ending with an inaccurate diagnosis (rows 9–16), ordered from most to least frequent.