Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 22;54:101487. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101487

Table 5.

A: Hemodynamics characteristics. Continuous data are median (I quartile-III quartile), categorical data are absolute numbers (percentages). AVAi: Aortic Valve Area indexed. B: The table also reports results of the weighted Gamma models evaluating the association with valve type. Gamma models’ results are reported as Average Marginal Effect (AME) for ME vs. Intuity and Intuity vs. Inspiris, lower and upper bound of the 95% Confidence Interval, and p-value.

A
Variables Intuity (N=1688) Magna (N=296) Inspiris (N=605) Combined (N=2589)
LVEF (%) 58 [55–62] 57 [53–62] 57.75 [52–60.4] 58 [53.2–62]
AVAi (cm2/m2) 1.09 [0.91–1.31] 1.04 [0.86–1.27] 1.01 [0.81–1.27] 1.06 [0.89–1.29]
Mean Gradient (mmHg) 10 [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] 13 [9.5–18] 10 [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] 10 [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]
Peak Gradient (mmHg) 18 [14–23] 21 [16–29] 18 [14–24] 19 [14–24]
Aortic Regurgitation (>mild) 9 (0.5 %) 2 (0.7 %) 1 (0.2 %) 12 (0.5 %)
B
Device comparison AME Lower Upper P-value
ME vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg) 3.49 2.96 4.03 < 0.001
Peak Gradient (mmHg) 4.41 3.46 5.35 < 0.001
Inspiris vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg) 0.41 −0.12 0.95 0.13
Peak Gradient (mmHg) 1.29 0.28 2.29 0.012

Table legend: LVEF: Left ventricular outflow tract; AVAi: Aortic valve area index; ME: Magna Ease.