Table 6.

The table reports results of the weighted Gamma models evaluating the association with valve type. Gamma models’ results are reported as Average Marginal Effect (AME) for ME vs. Intuity and Intuity vs. Inspiris, lower and upper bound of the 95 % Confidence Interval, and p-value.

Prosthesis 19	AME	Lower	Upper	P-value
ME vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg)	5.45	3.61	7.29	< 0.001
Peak Gradient (mmHg)	7.05	3.68	10.41	< 0.001
Inspiris vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg)	−1.003	−2.65	0.65	0.234
Peak Gradient (mmHg)	1.33	−2.01	4.67	0.44
Prosthesis 21
ME vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg)	4.8	3.75	5.85	< 0.001
Peak Gradient (mmHg)	6.08	4.17	7.99	< 0.001
Inspiris vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg)	0.5	−0.54	1.55	0.341
Peak Gradient (mmHg)	1.19	−0.93	3.31	0.271
Prosthesis 23
ME vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg)	2.72	1.92	3.52	< 0.001
Peak Gradient (mmHg)	3.67	2.19	5.15	< 0.001
Inspiris vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg)	0.84	−0.06	1.73	0.066
Peak Gradient (mmHg)	2.24	0.48	4.01	0.013
Prosthesis 25
ME vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg)	2.08	1.22	2.93	< 0.001
Peak Gradient (mmHg)	2.11	0.68	3.54	0.004
Inspiris vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg)	−0.33	−1.11	0.44	0.4
Peak Gradient (mmHg)	−0.22	−1.59	1.16	0.755
Prosthesis 27
ME vs Intuity
Mean Gradient (mmHg)	−0.7	−2.35	0.94	0.403
Peak Gradient (mmHg)	−1.42	−4.14	1.29	0.304

Table legend. ME: Magna Ease.