Table 4. Vacuum bell therapy—results part III.
| Values | |
|---|---|
| Were patients/parents satisfied with duration and success of VBT? | |
| Yes | 71.8% |
| No [no (significant) improvement of PE; recurrence after decreasing application/cessation] | 28.2% |
| Were you/your team satisfied with duration and success of VBT? | |
| Yes | 68.4% |
| No [no (significant) improvement of PE; duration too long; no follow-up] | 31.6% |
| Do you consider VBT as a useful tool in the treatment of PE? | |
| Yes | 90.5% |
| No (not enough effective) | 9.5% |
| Do you consider that CWIG should promote guidelines for the standardization of VBT? | |
| Yes | 93% |
| No | 7% |
PE, pectus excavatum; VBT, vacuum bell therapy; CWIG, Chest Wall International Group.