Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 15;16(8):5285–5298. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-408

Table 4. Vacuum bell therapy—results part III.

Values
Were patients/parents satisfied with duration and success of VBT?
   Yes 71.8%
   No [no (significant) improvement of PE; recurrence after decreasing application/cessation] 28.2%
Were you/your team satisfied with duration and success of VBT?
   Yes 68.4%
   No [no (significant) improvement of PE; duration too long; no follow-up] 31.6%
Do you consider VBT as a useful tool in the treatment of PE?
   Yes 90.5%
   No (not enough effective) 9.5%
Do you consider that CWIG should promote guidelines for the standardization of VBT?
   Yes 93%
   No 7%

PE, pectus excavatum; VBT, vacuum bell therapy; CWIG, Chest Wall International Group.