Skip to main content
. 2024 May 22;18:154–165. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.04.015

Table 5.

Effects of API supplementation on cecal microbial populations and its metabolites of ETEC-challenged piglets.

Item Treatments1
SEM P-value
CON ECON EANT E750API E1500API P12 P23
Microbial populations, lg (CFU/g)
Total bacteria 10.92 10.87 10.74 10.65 10.57 0.087 0.85 0.67
Escherichia coli 7.35 8.37 7.75 7.47 7.42 0.196 0.07 0.35
Bifidobacterial 6.37 5.85b 5.57b 6.95a 6.18ab 0.188 0.35 0.04
Lactobacillus 5.18 5.15a 5.31a 4.24b 5.43a 0.156 0.92 0.01
VFA, mg/g
Acetic acid 3.24 3.13b 3.33b 3.80ab 4.23a 0.146 0.82 0.03
Propionic acid 1.36 1.61 1.82 1.63 1.82 0.087 0.34 0.75
Butyric acid 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.19 0.23 0.011 0.18 0.08

API = artificial parasin I protein; ETEC = enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli; VFA = volatile fatty acids. Mean and total SEM are listed in separate columns (n = 6).

1

CON = basal diet; ECON = basal diet + ETEC; EANT = basal diet + antibiotics + ETEC; E750API = basal diet + 750 mg/kg API + ETEC; E1500API = basal diet + 1500 mg/kg API + ETEC.

2

P1 is the t-test P-value between CON and ECON group (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01).

3

P2 is the ANOVA P-value among the ETEC-challenged groups (ECON vs. EANT vs. E750API vs. E1500API). Values with different lowercase letter superscripts within a row mean significant differences (P < 0.05).