Table 2.

Correlations for variables measured in this study (n = 467)

Variables	Mean (SD)	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h	i	j	k	l	m
a. PI	37.610 (6.287)	1
b. CF	35.876 (19.103)	-0.527**	1
c. BO	24.281 (12.908)	-0.569**	0.950**	1
d. STS	11.595 (7.944)	-0.342**	0.861**	0.659**	1
e. MD	44.887 (38.730)	-0.269**	0.434**	0.389**	0.410**	1
f. MD1	14.355 (14.282)	-0.299**	0.439**	0.397**	0.410**	0.946**	1
g. MD2	10.647 (9.325)	-0.209**	0.376**	0.337**	0.358**	0.952**	0.849**
h. MD3	13.274 (11.414)	-0.211**	0.377**	0.319**	0.388**	0.944**	0.829**
i. MD4	6.610 (6.278)	-0.288**	0.432**	0.418**	0.361**	0.886**	0.794**
j. MR	2.578 (0.294)	0.295**	-0.361**	-0.349**	-0.302**	-0.343**	-0.343**	0.012	0.058	0.051	1
k. MR1	2.343 (0.614)	0.133**	-0.246**	-0.235**	-0.208**	-0.238**	-0.208**	-0.241**	-0.223**	-0.222**	0.763**	1
l. MR2	2.378 (0.575)	0.146**	-0.210**	-0.196**	-0.187**	-0.257**	-0.253**	-0.183**	-0.158**	-0.176**	0.834**	0.657**	1
m. MR3	17.801 (2.916)	0.205**	-0.129**	-0.130**	-0.100*	-0.031	-0.066	0.478**	0.506**	0.506**	-0.059	-0.506**	-0.430**	1

Note: PI: professional identity; CF: compassion fatigue; BO: burnout; STS: secondary traumatic stress; MD: moral distress; MD1: individual responsibility; MD2: not in patient’s best interest; MD3: values conflicts; MD4: harm to patient’s interest; MR: moral resilience; MR1: the ability to respond flexibly to moral adversity; MR2: relational moral soundness; MR3: moral efficacy. ^*Statistical significance at the level of 0.05 (two-tailed), ^**Statistical significance at the level of 0.01 (two-tailed)