Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 9;46(2):2400552. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2400552

Table 3.

GRADE evidence profile.

Certainty assessment
Summary of findings
Participants (studies) follow-up Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Overall certainty of evidence Study event rates (%)
Relative effect (95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects
With [usual care] With [CDSS] Risk with [usual care] Risk difference with [CDSS]
All-cause mortality
17,959 (8 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
1253/8707 (14.4%) 1322/9252 (14.3%) RR 1.00 (0.93–1.07) 144 per 1000 0 fewer per 1000 (from 10 fewer to 10 more)
Renal replacement therapy
18,355 (9 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
530/8903 (6.0%) 609/9452 (6.4%) RR 1.11 (0.99–1.24) 60 per 1000 7 more per 1000 (from 1 fewer to 14 more)
Hyperkalemia
1589 (3 RCTs) Seriousa Not serious Not serious Very seriousb None ⊕◯◯◯
Very low
13/619 (2.1%) 5/970 (0.5%) RR 0.27 (0.10–0.73) 21 per 1000 15 fewer per 1000 (from 19 fewer to 6 fewer)
eGFR
2460 (3 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousc None ⊕⊕⊕◯
Moderate
1211 1249 MD 1.97 higher (0.47 higher to 3.48 higher)
Re-hospitalization
5307 (3 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
385/2653 (14.5%) 348/2654 (13.1%) RR 0.90 (0.79–1.03) 145 per 1000 15 fewer per 1000 (from 30 fewer to 4 more)
Creatinine
4801 (3 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
2377 2424 MD 0 (0.04 lower to 0.04 higher)
AKI in discharge
3335 (4 RCTs) Seriousd Very seriouse Not serious Seriousc None ⊕◯◯◯
Very low
464/1619 (28.7%) 770/1716 (44.9%) RR 1.39 (0.94–2.05) 287 per 1000 112 more per 1000 (from 17 fewer to 301 more)
Renal recovery
3135 (3 RCTs) Seriousf Not serious Not serious Not serious None ⊕⊕⊕◯
Moderate
790/1519 (52.0%) 831/1616 (51.4%) RR 0.99 (0.93–1.06) 520 per 1000 5 fewer per 1000 (from 36 fewer to 31 more)
Progression of AKI
14,439 (4 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
1280/6981 (18.3%) 1310/7458 (17.6%) RR 0.98 (0.92–1.05) 183 per 1000 4 fewer per 1000 (from 15 fewer to 9 more)
Length of hospital stay
39,950 (6 RCTs) Not serious Very seriouse Not serious Not serious None ⊕⊕◯◯
Low
21,918 18,032 MD 0.22 lower (1.31 lower to 0.86 higher)
Hospital cost
13,298 (3 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Extremely seriousc None ⊕◯◯◯
Very low
6584 6714 MD 826.46 higher (110.14 lower to 1763.06 higher)
Patients received NASIDs
15,943 (6 RCTs) Not serious Seriousg Not serious Seriousc None ⊕⊕◯◯
Low
1212/7902 (15.3%) 1064/8041 (13.2%) RR 0.81 (0.65–1.00) 153 per 1000 29 fewer per 1000 (from 54 fewer to 0 fewer)
Patients received aminoglycosides
10,631 (3 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousc None ⊕⊕⊕◯
Moderate
126/5248 (2.4%) 99/5383 (1.8%) RR 0.78 (0.60–1.00) 24 per 1000 5 fewer per 1000 (from 10 fewer to 0 fewer)
Patients received ACEi and ARBs
15,891 (5 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
2148/7876 (27.3%) 2187/8015 (27.3%) RR 1.01 (0.96–1.06) 273 per 1000 3 more per 1000 (from 11 fewer to 16 more)
Patients received contrast
10,831 (4 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
461/5348 (8.6%) 474/5483 (8.6%) RR 1.01 (0.91–1.13) 86 per 1000 1 more per 1000 (from 8 fewer to 11 more)
Patients received fluid
10,831 (4 RCTs) Not serious Very seriouse Not serious Seriousc None ⊕◯◯◯
Very low
1524/5348 (28.5%) 1839/5483 (33.5%) RR 1.13 (0.95–1.36) 285 per 1000 37 more per 1000 (from 14 fewer to 103 more)
Patients underwent renal ultrasound
4653 (3 RCTs) Not serious Very seriouse Not serious Very seriousc None ⊕◯◯◯
Very low
103/2303 (4.5%) 165/2350 (7.0%) RR 1.99 (0.69–5.78) 45 per 1000 44 more per 1000 (from 14 fewer to 214 more)
Nephrologist consultation
16,818 (7 RCTs) Not serious Seriousg Not serious Seriousc None ⊕⊕◯◯
Low
1440/8310 (17.3%) 1555/8508 (18.3%) RR 1.13 (0.96–1.33) 173 per 1000 23 more per 1000 (from 7 fewer to 57 more)

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; RR: risk ratio.

aThomas et al. had an overall concern of bias with 65% of pooled analysis weight.

bA wide confidence interval that does not exclude the risk of appreciable harm/benefit with a low number of events.

cA wide confidence interval that does not exclude the risk of appreciable harm/benefit.

dWu et al. had an overall concern of bias with 31.7% of pooled analysis weight.

eI2 > 75%.

fWu et al. had an overall concern of bias with 27% of pooled analysis weight.

gI2 > 50%.