Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 6;16(13):651–667. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2024.2350266

Table 3.

Precision and accuracy, recovery and matrix effects data for SIR-2 in plasma.

    LLOQ QC Low QC Low-Medium QC Medium QC High QC Dilution QC
Hybrid LC-MS Nominal concentration (ng/ml) 0.200 0.600 8.00 80.0 160 10000
Precision and accuracy 7.67 (28.8) 3.19 (13.7) 9.60 (6.20) 14.3 (8.81) -2.62 (6.22) -22.6 (7.40)
Recovery (%) N/A 88.5 ± 20.4 N/A 103 ± 6.48 103 ± 10.0 N/A
Matrix factor N/A 1.09 ± 0.32 N/A 1.06 ± 0.07 0.92 ± 0.09 N/A
SL-RT-qPCR Nominal concentration (ng/ml) 0.128 0.500 2.50 50.0 1000 5000
Precision and accuracy 5.25 (7.95) 18.6 (7.50) 14.9 (7.94) 20.1 (7.69) -14.5 (8.70) -5.96 (10.9)
HELISA Nominal concentration (ng/ml) 1.00 3.00 N/A 30.0 200 10000
Precision and accuracy -4.93 (5.80) -0.648 (15.3) N/A 11.5 (15.7) 11.6 (6.09) 7.62 (12.7)
SPE-LC-MS Nominal concentration (ng/ml) 5.00 15.0 N/A 200 400 10000
Precision and accuracy 6.60 (8.53) 23.0 (17.1) N/A -6.62 (15.4) 13.7 (24.0) -18.7 (14.1)
Recovery (%) N/A 43.4 ± 11.4 N/A 31.7 ± 4.39 36.4 ± 13.6 N/A
Matrix factor N/A 1.02 ± 0.12 N/A 0.94 ± 0.09 1.13 ± 0.33 N/A

Samples were diluted 100× with control plasma prior to analysis.

Determined by comparing to signals in post-extraction spiked plasma samples to post-extraction spiked water samples, which is a relative assessment of matrix effects. Absolute matrix effects which also consider the impact of reagents used during sample preparation may be different from this value.

Data are presented as %Bias (%CV) or as Arithmetic Mean ± Standard Deviation (n = 6 for each QC level, except for the dilution QC where n = 3).

HELISA: Hybridization ELISA; LLOQ: Lower limit of quantitation; N/A: Not applicable; QC: Quality control; SL-RT-qPCR: Stem-loop reverse transcription quantitative PCR; SPE: Solid-phase extraction.