Table 3. Results from mixed models testing the contextual role of group-level concealment.
| Identity-Based | Psychological | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rejection Sensitivity | Distress | |||||
| B | SE | p | B | SE | p | |
| Group-Level Concealment | 6.95 | 1.15 | < .001 | 14.40 | 3.37 | < .001 |
| GMC Concealment | 5.42 | 0.48 | < .001 | 5.48 | 2.02 | .007 |
| Identity-Based Rejection Sensitivity | - | - | - | 1.00 | 0.19 | < .001 |
| Total Effect: | ||||||
| Group-Level Concealment | - | - | - | 21.31 | 3.48 | < .001 |
| GMC Concealment | - | - | - | 10.88 | 1.80 | < .001 |
| Indirect Effect: | ab | 95% CI | ||||
| Group-Level through Rejection Sensitivity | 6.93 | 3.76, 10.61 | ||||
Note. GMC = Group-Mean-Centered