Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 12;5(9):749–757. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0088.R1

Table II.

Outcomes of patients with a proximal ulna tumour treated with wide resection and reconstruction.

No. Supination/pronation
ROM, °
Flexion/extension ROM, ° MSTS, % TESS MEPS Union, mths Degenerative joint disease,
grade
Recurrence, mths Metastasis, mths Complication
1 100 110 92.7 88 90 8 - - - -
2 65 65 74.4 70 65 14 2 8 - Medial instability
3 85 100 91.3 89 80 9 1 - 6 -
4 50 50 80.4 80 60 12 1 - - Allograft and plate fracture, medial instability
5 110 110 85.2 88 80 8 1 - - Plate fracture
6 110 100 94.3 90 90 10 1 - - -
7 60 80 67.7 75 60 11 2 6 6 Infection, allograft fracture
8 105 105 81.5 83 80 10 1 - - -
9 75 90 77.3 78 80 14 1 - - Infection
10 90 120 88.8 84 85 8 1 - 8 -
11 110 110 88.2 90 90 7 - - - -
12 100 110 91.1 90 90 8 - - - -
13* - - - - - 8 3 - - Severe medial instability
*

Patient who had fusion.

MEPS, Mayo Elbow Performance Score; MSTS, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society; ROM, range of motion; TESS, Toronto Extremity Salvage Score.