Table 3.
Subjects are faster when making Repeat and Foil responses compared to Lure across all standard experiments.
| Experiment | Med RT: repeat | Med RT: lure | Med RT: foil |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | 1.17 (0.28) | 1.34 (0.32) | 1.31 (0.28) |
| E2 | 1.21 (0.22) | 1.34 (0.24) | 1.26 (0.23) |
| E3 | 1.25 (0.23) | 1.38 (0.29) | 1.35 (0.31) |
| E4 | 1.72 (0.36) | 1.99 (0.42) | 1.80 (0.36) |
| E5 | 1.11 (0.20) | 1.37 (0.31) | 1.13 (0.22) |
| E6 | 1.05 (0.21) | 1.30 (0.34) | 1.11 (0.26) |
| E7a | 1.09 (0.16) | 1.29 (0.18) | 1.17 (0.17) |
| E7b | 1.34 (0.20) | 1.37 (0.14) | 1.15 (0.20) |
We show median (IQR) RT for each response type. We find that, on average, participants tend to take longer when they make a Lure response, especially when compared to when they make a Repeat response (Wilcoxon Rank Sign Test comparing median RT for repeat vs. lure responses and foil vs. lure responses for experiments 1 − 7a, p < 0.001 except for E1,2,3 Lure vs. Foil which were not statistically significant).