Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 29;18:1432270. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1432270

Table 3.

Comparison of the effects of MBIs and sham (control) interventions in the chronic pain studies, focusing on the main pain outcomes.

References Main aim Type of sham (control) intervention Main chronic pain outcomes
Severity/ intensity/ frequency Pain-related disability Quality of life (health related/ neuropathic-specific) Medication consumption Emotional distress (unpleasantness/ catastrophizing/ anxiety/ depression/ coping)
Davies et al. (2023) Effects of Specific- and General- sham interventions - General Sham mindfulness (GSM) - Specific Sham mindfulness (SSM) MBI=Controls (both GSM and SSM) GSM=SSM N/A N/A MBI=Controls (both GSM and SSM) GSM=SSM MBI=Controls (both GSM and SSM) GSM=SSM
Davoudi et al. (2021) Vitamin D effects Pharmacologic placebo MBI>Control MBI>Control MBI>Control N/A N/A
Khatib et al. (2024) Opioid effects in MBI and Sham-MBI - Sham-matched mindfulness - Saline infusion MBI> sham mindfulness N/A N/A N/A N/A
Schmidt et al. (2011) MBSR in fibromyalgia General Sham Mindfulness (GSM) N/A N/A MBI=GSMa N/A N/A
Seminowicz et al. (2020) MBSR in headache Stress management MBI>Control N/A N/A N/A N/A
Westenberg et al. (2018) Mindfulness-based video exercise Attention placebo control MBI>Control N/A N/A N/A MBI>Control
Zautra et al. (2008) Mindfulness in arthritis Attention placebo control (education) M>Controlb N/A N/A N/A MBI>Controlb

MBI>Control means that the effect of MBI was significantly higher than the sham intervention.

aGeneral Active Sham (Active Control) had statistically significant effects in secondary outcomes in longitudinal analysis and comparison with passive control.

bDependent on history of recurrent depression.