Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 11;14:74. doi: 10.1038/s41387-024-00331-0

Table 1.

Baseline sociodemographic characteristics and CGM metrics of the total sample (N = 110) and for the insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant groups separately.

All (N = 110) Insulin-sensitive (n = 57) Insulin-resistant (n = 53) P valuea,b
Sex, n
 Female 65 (59.1) 32 (56.1) 33 (62.3) 0.563
 Male 45 (40.9) 25 (43.9) 20 (37.7)
Age, years 48.7 ± 14.3 45.4 ± 15.2 52.3 ± 12.4 0.009
Education, years 15.6 ± 2.9 16.3 ± 2.4 14.8 ± 3.2 0.019
BMI, kg/m2 28.5 ± 6.1 24.7 ± 2.7 32.7 ± 6.1 0.000
 BMI ≤ 24.9 39 (35.5) 34 (59.6) 5 (9.4) 0.000
 BMI 25 to 29.9 36 (32.7) 20 (35.1) 16 (30.2)
 BMI ≥ 30 35 (31.8) 3 (5.3) 32 (60.4)
Waist circumference, cm 97.1 ± 15.9 87.7 ± 11.2 107.3 ± 13.9 0.000
CRP, mg/dl 0.1 [0.05–0.24] 0.05 [0.04–0.11] 0.19 [0.09–0.43] 0.000
HbA1c, mmol/mol 37 ± 4.4 34 ± 3.3 39 ± 5.5 0.000
HOMA-IR 2.7 ± 2.3 1.2 ± 0.4 4.3 ± 2.4 0.000
Untreated type 2 diabetes, n 4 (3.6) 0 (0) 4 (7.5) 0.051
CGM metrics
 MAGE 39.8 ± 13.1 35.9 ± 8.6 44.0 ± 15.7 0.004
 Mean SG, mg/dl 95.3 ± 11.5 91.6 ± 7.3 99.2 ± 13.8 0.001
 Glucose variability (CV), % 16.5 ± 3.8 15.8 ± 3.2 17.2 ± 4.3 0.038
 SD, mg/dl 15.7 ± 4.5 14.4 ± 2.7 17.2 ± 5.5 0.004

BMI body mass index, CGM continuous glucose monitoring, CRP C-reactive protein, CV coefficient of variation (glucose variability), EMA ecological ambulatory assessment, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, MAGE mean amplitude of glucose excursions, SD standard deviation, SG sensor glucose.

Data are means ± SD, median [Interquartile range], or n (%).

aFisher exact test for categorical variables.

bMann-Whitney U test for continuous variables.