Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 11;14(9):e70025. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70025

TABLE 6.

Results of the structural model analysis.

Hypo. Path Original sample Standard deviation T statistics p Values f 2 Decision
H1 IE → PTG 0.087 .047 1.829 .067 .006 Not supported
H2 IE → AUT 0.541 .033 16.484 .000 .512 Supported
H3 IE → REL 0.215 .035 6.145 .000 .056 Supported
H4 IE → COM 0.635 .034 18.591 .000 .372 Supported
H5 AUT → PTG 0.048 .046 1.052 .293 .001 Not supported
H6 REL → PTG 0.127 .041 3.139 .002 .013 Supported
H7 COM → PTG 0.053 .040 1.332 .183 .002 Not supported
H8 RE → PTG 0.063 .040 1.577 .115 .003 Not supported
H9 RE → AUT 0.375 .035 10.578 .000 .246 Supported
H10 RE → REL 0.605 .035 17.396 .000 .440 Supported
H11 RE → COM 0.080 .033 2.395 .017 .006 Supported
H12 RES × AUT → PTG 0.001 .031 .022 .982 .000 Not supported
H13 RES x REL → PTG −0.180 .024 7.355 .000 .077 Supported
H14 RES x COM → PTG 0.189 .026 7.301 .000 .065 Supported

Abbreviations: AUT, autonomy; COM, competence; IE, intellectual engagement; PTG, post‐traumatic growth; RE, relational engagement; REL, resilience; RES, relatedness.