Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Artif Intell Med Conf Artif Intell Med (2005-). 2024 Jul 25;14844:90–100. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-66538-7_11

Table 4.

Comparison of different measures of prediction accuracy and number of features used across different classifiers trained using all of the survey questions. Reported results are over a 5 × 5 nested cross-validation with mean ± standard error over the outer folds. Bold entries denote highest accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and lowest number of features used.

Classifier Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Features Used
Logistic Regression 0.653 ± 0.034 0.407 ± 0.061 0.800 ± 0.067 37.4 ± 10.4
Random Forest 0.659 ± 0.025 0.513 ± 0.086 0.744 ± 0.038 70.6 ± 15.0
Gradient Boosting 0.666 ± 0.027 0.402 ± 0.092 0.822 ± 0.021 38.0 ± 18.3