Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 30;20(8):e1012507. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012507

Fig 1. Impact of C. difficile CD630Δerm sspA and sspB mutations on sporulation and UV resistance.

Fig 1

A) Day 6 sporulating cultures were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in PBS and imaged on a Leica DM6B microscope. The red arrow represents an immature spore. B) Strains were grown on 70:30 sporulation medium for 48 hours and the cultures then were treated with 30% ethanol and plated onto rich medium supplemented with TA to enumerate spores. Spore yield was calculated by log10 transformation of the CFUs derived from spores. C) Spores were exposed to UV for 10 minutes with constant agitation. After treatment, they were serially diluted and plated onto rich medium supplemented with TA. The ratio of treated to untreated CFUs of the mutant strains was then compared to the ratio from WT. pEV indicates an empty plasmid within the strain. All data points represent the average of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA with Šίdák’s multiple comparisons test. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001, **** P<0.0001.