Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 1;16(8):e940–e946. doi: 10.4317/jced.61853

Table 2.

Perceived esthetics. Comparison based on the composite used. (N=51).

Questions Composite group Contrast test
Tetric Evoceram (n=26) Transbond XT (n=25) Statistic P-value
1.- Choice for esthetic reasons 65.4 % 76.0 % 0.69 (NS) .406
2.- Assessment of the color of the attachments 7.58 (±1.50) 7.36 (±2.20) 0.41 (NS) .681
3.- Esthetic appearance 6.77 (±2.05) 6.60 (±1.96) 0.30 (NS) .764
4.- Comments received by their attachments 30.8 % 36.0 % 0.16 (NS) .692
5.- Perceive a change of color in the attachments 19.2 % 40.0 % 2.65 (NS) .104

(NS)= NOT significant