Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 12;14:21348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72649-9

Table 3.

Evaluation metrics based on estimated lesion volumes for the two MS datasets. The best value for each metric is shown in bold. Last row shows results after excluding worst performing algorithm.

Correlation with true lesion volume Correlation with number of lesions MAE
[ml]
Dataset I
 SAMSEG 0.91 0.67 2.81
 LST 0.88 0.55 3.51
 nicMSlesions 0.89 0.43 5.44
 U-Net 0.51 0.64 5.46
 TrUE-Net 0.92 0.28 9.5
 Majority voting 0.92 0.83 2.59
 STAPLE 0.93 0.80 4.08
Dataset II
 SAMSEG 0.96 0.78 6.86
 LST 0.95 0.24 4.90
 nicMSlesions 0.93 0.75 7.57
 U-Net 0.56 0.69 14.0
 TrUE-Net 0.91 -0.09 8.24
 Majority voting 0.97 0.94 5.99
 STAPLE 0.98 0.87 2.05