Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 23;14(17):1842. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171842

Table 2.

Table summarizing major advantages and disadvantages of the most relevant neuroimaging techniques for diagnosis, pre-operative surgical planning, and post-operative monitoring of patients with non-syndromic craniosynostosis.

Neuroimaging Advantages Disadvantages
Ultrasound Non-irradiating technique
Fast and repeatable
Non-invasive
No sedation required
Widely available
Low-cost
User-dependent
Inconclusive if poor patients’cooperation
Limited use in relatively advanced-age patients
Poor evaluation of deeper structures
Computed tomography Fast acquisition
Readily accessible
Sedation generally not required
Widely available
Limited cost
Excellent bone evaluation
Multiplanar and 3D reconstructions easily available
Irradiating technique (thus repeated CT scans over time should be limited)
Limited evaluation of soft tissues and associated brain abnormalities
Iodinated contrast media required for vascular structures depiction
Magnetic resonance imaging Non-irradiating technique
Repeatable over time
Excellent soft tissue definition
Excellent potential due to advanced techniques
Gadolinium-based contrast media generally not required
Reference method for associated brain and spine abnormalities search
Sedation usually required
Not always readily accessible
Long acquisition
Higher cost
Specific professional experience required for data interpretation
Longer data post-processing
Digital subtraction angiography Excellent vascular structures depiction
Real-time observation of blood flow dynamics
Potentially combinable with interventional procedures, when required (cost-effective)
Irradiating technique
More invasive
Specific professional experience required
Iodinated contrast media always required
Sedation usually required
Higher cost
Not always readily accessible
Limited spatial resolution
Very poor or no evaluation of structures other than vascular