Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 3;12(17):1757. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171757

Table 2.

Steps, processes and methodological options used in the different Delphi studies included in the literature review.

Steps and Procedures Methodological Options Study
Preparatory procedures
  • -

    Literature review

[60,61,62,63,64,67,68,72,73,74]
  • -

    Literature review and expert consultation (focus groups and discussion groups)

[59,60,61,63,66,71,73]
  • -

    Deliberation among the research team regarding the components to be presented for evaluation to the Delphi panel

[66,67,71,75]
  • -

    No preparatory procedures

[65,70,76,77]
Expert access procedures
  • -

    The experts were recruited conveniently through direct and exclusive contact initiated by research team members

[60,63,77]
  • -

    Recruitment by referencing and snowball method

[59,65,67]
  • -

    Experts recruited by identifying them through online platforms of organisations pertinent to the study area of specific competence

[59,75]
  • -

    Recruitment through direct contact with relevant organisations in certain areas of expertise

[63,71,73]
  • -

    Recruitment through electronic newsletters, institutional online websites, and scientific meetings

[69,75]
  • -

    Recruitment by reviewing papers relevant to a particular area of expertise

[77]
Call for expert participation procedures
  • -

    Email

[59,65,69,70,71,73,75]
  • -

    Telephone contact and face-to-face contact promoted by the researchers

[69]
  • -

    Face-to-face contact by reference elements identified by the research team in the professional practice contexts from which the experts came

[72]
Expert selection procedures
  • -

    Selection process involved representing various facets, sensitivities, and current understandings of the topic

[69,72,76]
  • -

    Selection was conducted based on criteria related to the specificity and nature of the position held by the expert

[59,60,61,64,65,66,67,69,70,71,73,74,76,78,79]
  • -

    Selection process considered geographical and cultural differences as criteria

[59,67,77]
  • -

    Selection based on the experts’ professional experience relevant to the topic under study

[60,62,63,64,66,67,68,69,71,72,73,77]
  • -

    Selection based on the expert’s express indication of willingness to participate in the study

[60,67,70]
Instrumentation
  • -

    Electronic questionnaire

[59,61,69,70,72,73,74,76]
  • -

    Postal questionnaire

[77,78]
  • -

    Semi-structured interview (telephone, face-to-face or group dynamics) and questionnaire

[60,63,65,66]
Data analysis
  • -

    Content analysis, establishing a structure of categories and thematic areas (domains and subdomains) or statements

[65,69,72,77]
  • -

    Absolute frequencies and relative frequencies, mean and standard deviation

[60,65,70,73,78]
  • -

    Content Validity Index (CVI)

[61,62,63,66,67,68,69,70,72,73,74,76]
  • -

    Mean and standard deviation

[63,70,73,75,78]
  • -

    Expert coordination coefficient (Kendall’s W) and coefficient of variation (CV)

[60,64,66,67,71]
  • -

    Weighted Kappa coefficient (Kw)

[67]