Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 13;5:0160. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0160

Table 2.

Performance comparison of different pain sensors and devices

Sensing type Signal Sensor Mainstream material Advantage Limitation
Electrical ECG, EMG, EEG, EDA Electrodes Ag/AgCl [164] High performance and stability Low biocompatibility
Polypyrrole (PPy) [165] High performance Low stability
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [166] High performance and suitable for Flexibility Low biocompatibility
Respiration, PPG Piezoelectric sensors Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) [167] High performance and suitable for Flexibility Low piezoelectric efficiency
Piezoelectric nanomaterials [168] High performance High cost
Optical PPG Photodiode [169] High sensitivity and low noise No built-in gain
Phototransistor [170] High sensitivity High noise and low responding speed
Thermal Temperature Thermal resistance Platinum thermal resistor [171] High accuracy but slow Slow responding time
Infrared temperature sensor Low accuracy Quick responding time

ECG, electrocardiogram; EMG, electromyography; EEG, electroencephalogram; EDA, electrodermal activity; PPG, photoplethysmographic