Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 29;13(17):5138. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175138

Table 1.

Atrial fibrillation ablation in HFrEF.

CASTLE-AF RAFT-AF CASTLE-HTX AMICA TRIAL CAMERA-
MRI
Year 2018 2022 2023 2019 2017
Design Multicenter open label
RCT
Multicenter open-label
RCT
Single-center
open-label
RCT
Multicenter open-label
RCT
Multicenter RCT
Mean age (years) 64 ± 5 67 ± 8 64 ± 11 65 ± 8 61 ± 10
AF type Parox: 32.5%
Pers: 38.3%
LS-pers:
29.2%
Parox: 7.3%
Pers: 69.3%
LS-pers:
23.4%
Parox: 30%
Pers: 56%
LS-pers:
14%
Pers: 76.4%
LS-pers:
23.6%
Pers: 100%
Baseline LVEF 25–38% 41 ± 15% 27 ± 6% 26 ± 9% 33 ± 9%
NYHA I: 11%
II: 60%
III: 28%
IV: 1%
II: 67%
III: 33%
II: 31%
III: 55%
IV: 14%
II: 39%
III: 61%
Mean NYHA class: 2.5 ± 0.6
Adjunctive ablation targets other than PVI ND 91.2% ND 33% 100%
Control arm therapy Medical therapy Rate control Guideline
directed
Best medical therapy Rate control
Primary outcome All-cause mortality and HF hospitalization All-cause mortality and HF events Death from any cause, LVAD implantation or urgent heart TX Absolute increase in LVEF Change in LVEF at 6 months
Mean change in LVEF (ablation vs. control) 8.0% vs. 0.2% 10.1 ± 1.2 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2 7.8 ± 7.6 vs. 1.4 ± 7.2 8.8% vs. 7.3% 18.3% vs. 4.4%
Rhythm control outcome (ablation vs. control) 63.1 vs. 21.7% in SR (5 years) 85.6 vs. 12.9% in SR at 2 years 31.4 ± 33.3 vs. 8.6 ± 26.3 AF burden reduction at 1 year 73.5% vs. 50% in SR 25% vs. 100% in AF
Main findings Reduction in all-cause death or HF hospitalization Similar primary outcomes and increase in LVEF Reduction in primary composite endpoint No LVEF improvement LVEF improvement
Follow-up (months) 38 37 18 12 6

RCT: randomized controlled trial; AF: atrial fibrillation; Parox: paroxysmal AF; Pers: persistent AF; LS-Pers: long-standing AF; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; SR: sinus rhythm; HF: heart failure; LVAD: left ventricular assist device; heart TX: heart transplantation; PVI: pulmonary vein isolation; NYHA: New York Heart Association score.