Mikashima et al. (2004) [43] |
Retrospective study |
Japan |
Intervention 1 group |
Elmslie-Trillat distal realignment procedure |
41 (8.7) mo (range 28 to 52 mo) |
20 (5/15) with recurrent patellar dislocation and subluxation |
26.4 (9.7) y (range 14 to 45 y) |
20 |
Intervention 2 group |
Elmslie-Trillat distal realignment procedure + MPFL reconstruction |
31.7 (10.5) mo (range 24 to 44 mo) |
20 (6/14) with recurrent patellar dislocation and subluxation |
26.0 (10.0) y (range 16 to 55 y) |
20 |
Woods et al. (2006) [48] |
Case series (prospective cohort study) |
USA |
Intervention group (with contralateral limb as control) |
Arthroscopic lateral retinacular release, including complete release of the vastus lateralis tendon |
27 mo (range 24–43 mo) |
24 (7/17) with recurrent patellar dislocation |
22.3 y; 26.2 (14.6) y (M); 20.7 (6.6) y (F) |
20 |
Ronga et al. (2009) [44] |
Case series (prospective cohort study) |
Italy |
Intervention group (with contralateral limb as control) |
MPFL reconstruction using a hamstring graft passed through two transverse patellar tunnels |
37.2 mo (range 30–48 mo) [3.1 y (range, 2.5–4 y)] |
28 (21/7) with recurrent patellar dislocation |
32.5 (11.4) y; (range 19 to 40 y) |
24 |
Smith et al. (2014) [45] |
Observational, non-experimental repeated measures study |
UK |
Intervention |
MPFL reconstruction |
Up to 12 mo |
30 (16/14) with recurrent patellar dislocation |
23.1 (6.4) y |
30 at baseline, 27 at 1.5 mo, 21 at 3 mo, 21 at 12 mo |
Tompkins et al. (2014) [47] |
Retrospective study |
USA |
Intervention 1 group (with contralateral limb as control) |
MPFL reconstruction |
29.2 (15.9) mo |
11 (NR) with recurrent patellar instability |
19.8 y |
8 patients (4/4, 1 bilateral), totaling 9 knees |
|
|
|
Intervention 2 (with contralateral limb as control) |
MPFL repair |
43 (19.9) mo |
29 (NR) with recurrent patellar instability |
20.1 y |
12 patients (3/9, 2 bilateral), totaling 14 knees |
Smith et al. (2015) [46] |
Pragmatic multi-center RCT |
UK |
Intervention 1 |
Strengthening of VM |
Up to 12 mo |
25 (14/11) with first-time patellar dislocation |
23.9 (7.5) |
16 at 1.5 mo, 10 at 6 mo, 10 at 12 mo |
Intervention 2 (considered control in the study) |
Strengthening of all quadriceps |
Up to 12 mo |
25 (14/11) with first-time patellar dislocation |
23.0 (6.9) |
21 at 1.5 mo, 15 at 6 mo, 14 at 12 mo |
Asaeda et al. (2016) [40] |
Case series with matched controls (case-control study) |
Japan |
Intervention group |
MPFL reconstruction |
Up to 12 mo |
11 (3/8) with recurrent patellar dislocation |
21.2 (7.6) y, range 15 to 35 y |
11 pre-operation, 10 at 3 mo, 9 at 6 mo, 11 at 12 mo |
Control group |
Uninjured patients |
Not applicable |
15 (NR) |
22.1 (1.8) y |
Not applicable |
Arrebola et al. (2019) [39] |
Cross-sectional, case-control, observational study |
Brazil |
Intervention group |
No intervention |
Not applicable |
44 (14/30) with at least one episode of atraumatic patellar dislocation |
22 (8) y |
Not applicable |
Control group |
Uninjured patients |
Not applicable |
44 (11/33) |
21 (5) y |
Not applicable |
Keilani et al. (2019) [41] |
Retrospective pilot study |
Austria |
Intervention 1 group |
MPFL reconstruction |
47 mo |
6 (6/0) with recurrent patellar dislocation |
33 y (range 18 to 38 y) |
6 |
Intervention 2 group |
Elmslie-Trillat distal realignment procedure |
43 mo |
6 (6/0) with recurrent patellar dislocation |
26 y (range 19 to 32 y) |
6 |
Lucas et al. (2020) [42] |
Cross-sectional study |
USA |
Intervention group |
No intervention |
Not applicable |
16 (3/13) with recurrent patellar instability |
21.1 (4.2) y |
Not applicable |
Control group |
Uninjured patients |
Not applicable |
16 (3/13) |
21.1 (3.9) y |
Not applicable |