Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 6;13(17):5288. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175288

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included. Abbreviations: mo (months); MPFL (medial patellofemoral ligament), NR (not reported); SD (standard deviation), VM (vastus medialis); and y (years).

Author (Publication Year) Study Design Country Group Description Type of Intervention Follow-Up (Mean (SD), Range) Number of Patients (Male/Female) Age (Mean (SD), Range) Number of Patients Who Completed the Follow-Up
Mikashima et al. (2004) [43] Retrospective study Japan Intervention 1 group Elmslie-Trillat distal realignment procedure 41 (8.7) mo (range 28 to 52 mo) 20 (5/15) with recurrent patellar dislocation and subluxation 26.4 (9.7) y (range 14 to 45 y) 20
Intervention 2 group Elmslie-Trillat distal realignment procedure + MPFL reconstruction 31.7 (10.5) mo (range 24 to 44 mo) 20 (6/14) with recurrent patellar dislocation and subluxation 26.0 (10.0) y (range 16 to 55 y) 20
Woods et al. (2006) [48] Case series (prospective cohort study) USA Intervention group (with contralateral limb as control) Arthroscopic lateral retinacular release, including complete release of the vastus lateralis tendon 27 mo (range 24–43 mo) 24 (7/17) with recurrent patellar dislocation 22.3 y; 26.2 (14.6) y (M); 20.7 (6.6) y (F) 20
Ronga et al. (2009) [44] Case series (prospective cohort study) Italy Intervention group (with contralateral limb as control) MPFL reconstruction using a hamstring graft passed through two transverse patellar tunnels 37.2 mo (range 30–48 mo) [3.1 y (range, 2.5–4 y)] 28 (21/7) with recurrent patellar dislocation 32.5 (11.4) y; (range 19 to 40 y) 24
Smith et al. (2014) [45] Observational, non-experimental repeated measures study UK Intervention MPFL reconstruction Up to 12 mo 30 (16/14) with recurrent patellar dislocation 23.1 (6.4) y 30 at baseline, 27 at 1.5 mo, 21 at 3 mo, 21 at 12 mo
Tompkins et al. (2014) [47] Retrospective study USA Intervention 1 group (with contralateral limb as control) MPFL reconstruction 29.2 (15.9) mo 11 (NR) with recurrent patellar instability 19.8 y 8 patients (4/4, 1 bilateral), totaling 9 knees
Intervention 2 (with contralateral limb as control) MPFL repair 43 (19.9) mo 29 (NR) with recurrent patellar instability 20.1 y 12 patients (3/9, 2 bilateral), totaling 14 knees
Smith et al. (2015) [46] Pragmatic multi-center RCT UK Intervention 1 Strengthening of VM Up to 12 mo 25 (14/11) with first-time patellar dislocation 23.9 (7.5) 16 at 1.5 mo, 10 at 6 mo, 10 at 12 mo
Intervention 2 (considered control in the study) Strengthening of all quadriceps Up to 12 mo 25 (14/11) with first-time patellar dislocation 23.0 (6.9) 21 at 1.5 mo, 15 at 6 mo, 14 at 12 mo
Asaeda et al. (2016) [40] Case series with matched controls (case-control study) Japan Intervention group MPFL reconstruction Up to 12 mo 11 (3/8) with recurrent patellar dislocation 21.2 (7.6) y, range 15 to 35 y 11 pre-operation, 10 at 3 mo, 9 at 6 mo, 11 at 12 mo
Control group Uninjured patients Not applicable 15 (NR) 22.1 (1.8) y Not applicable
Arrebola et al. (2019) [39] Cross-sectional, case-control, observational study Brazil Intervention group No intervention Not applicable 44 (14/30) with at least one episode of atraumatic patellar dislocation 22 (8) y Not applicable
Control group Uninjured patients Not applicable 44 (11/33) 21 (5) y Not applicable
Keilani et al. (2019) [41] Retrospective pilot study Austria Intervention 1 group MPFL reconstruction 47 mo 6 (6/0) with recurrent patellar dislocation 33 y (range 18 to 38 y) 6
Intervention 2 group Elmslie-Trillat distal realignment procedure 43 mo 6 (6/0) with recurrent patellar dislocation 26 y (range 19 to 32 y) 6
Lucas et al. (2020) [42] Cross-sectional study USA Intervention group No intervention Not applicable 16 (3/13) with recurrent patellar instability 21.1 (4.2) y Not applicable
Control group Uninjured patients Not applicable 16 (3/13) 21.1 (3.9) y Not applicable