Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 1;33(3):405–412. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202409_33(3).0011

Table 1.

Characteristics of the participants according to the ratio of dietary calcium intake in CHNS (1997-2006)

Variable Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 p value
< 0.96 0.96-1.44 1.45-2.53 2.54-5.78 ≥ 5.79
Case/N 129/420 131/419 112/421 130/419 166/420
Age (years) 61.9 (6.7) 60.8 (6.4) 61.2 (7.0) 61.0 (6.3) 61.1 (6.4) 0.199
Gender (Women) 204 (48.6) 197 (47.0) 212 (50.4) 212 (50.6) 216 (51.4) 0.714
Current smoking [n, (%)] 122 (29.0) 138 (32.9) 131 (31.1) 122 (29.1) 128 (30.5) 0.744
Drinking (drinks/week) 4.3 (13.9) 5.3 (15.1) 4.9 (14.5) 5.6 (14.6) 5.7 (15.3) 0.166
Physical activity (MET-h/week) 47.9 (84.5) 40.5 (75.3) 46.7 (78.7) 51.5 (84.1) 51.0 (85.3) <0.001
Urban index 59.0 (21.6) 52.8 (20.4) 61.1 (19.8) 64.3 (17.4) 68.0 (14.4) <0.001
Total energy intake (kcal/day) 2167 (599) 2217 (642) 2126 (638) 2212 (615) 2198 (625) 0.553
Total protein intake (g/day) 66.4 (23.3) 64.7 (23.8) 63.6 (21.0) 66.8 (23.6) 69.7 (22.9) 0.012
Total fat intake (g/day) 69.2 (37.2) 65.7 (35.8) 71.9 (39.3) 77.0 (36.4) 79.5 (41.5) <0.001
Total carbohydrate intake (g/day) 325 (114) 347 (119) 311 (109) 317 (108) 304 (101) <0.001
Total dietary fiber intake (g/day) 11.7 (6.5) 12.8 (9.9) 10.6 (6.1) 10.1 (8.0) 10.3 (8.3) <0.001
Calcium intake at breakfast (mg/day) 172 (131) 110 (72.7) 77.9 (50.9) 44.2 (27.3) 21.0 (14.7) <0.001
Calcium intake at dinner (mg/day) 98.6 (56.8) 128 (81.4) 147 (94.7) 165 (103) 247 (229) <0.001
Energy at breakfast (kcal/day) 667 (247) 653 (254) 559 (224) 510 (220) 447 (168) <0.001
Energy at dinner (kcal/day) 722 (240) 785 (270) 780 (263) 852 (278) 887 (297) <0.001
Hypertension [(n, (%)] 192 (45.7) 161 (38.4) 168 (39.9) 144 (34.3) 172 (41.0) 0.018
T2DM [(n, (%)] 79 (18.8) 71 (16.9) 71 (16.9) 71 (16.9) 81 (19.3) 0.048
BMI (kg/m2) 23.2 (3.8) 23.0 (3.5) 23.5 (3.5) 22.8 (3.3) 23.4 (3.6) 0.821

Q, quintile. T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMI, body mass index

Continuous variables were described as mean (SD) whereas categorical variables were described as n (%)

The significant difference were checked by Generalized linear models and χ2 test