Table 2:

Ratings correlations within and between domains. Within each domain, the two scales were significantly negatively correlated (shown in bold), indicating that they adequately reflected the opposing dimensions. Boxes indicate contrastive ‘double dissociation’ relationships across domains.

		Shape		Texture		Weight		Size		Brightness		Arousal		Valence
		Rounded	Pointed	Hard	Soft	Light	Heavy	Small	Big	Bright	Dark	Calming	Exciting	Good	Bad
Shape	Rounded
	Pointed	−32 ***
Texture	Hard	−22***	78***
	Soft	.26***	−53***	−59 ***
Weight	Light	−.01	− 50***	−61***	47***
	Heavy	.01	50***	65***	−49***	−64 ***
Size	Small	.06	.03	−.01	22***	.26***	−20***
	Big	19***	24***	33***	−31***	− 48***	49***	−43 ***
Brightness	Bright	−.66***	35***	21***	−28***	−.02	.01	−.05	06
	Dark	46***	−23***	−.07	.04	−23***	17***	−20***	25***	−.53 ***
Arousal	Calming	.36***	− 67***	−.66***	53***	48***	−49***	.10	29***	−31***	.12**
	Exciting	−49***	40***	23***	−23***	−.01	.05	.01	.03	50***	−44***	−.33 ***
Valence	Good	−.11	− 32***	−33***	14**	39***	−39***	.11*	34***	17***	−30***	35***	.1
	Bad	.07	31***	29***	−.12**	−.26***	28***	.02	21***	−.08	16***	−.36***	−.02	−51 ***

Degrees of freedom = 535 in all cases

^*p < .05

^**p < .01

^***p < .001

cross-domain comparisons are Bonferroni-corrected for four tests (α = .0125)