Table 5. Changes in perceived knowledge from unpaired, unequal T-tests.
Knowledge Areas | Pre-Webinar | Post-PCQI | Change in Perceived Knowledge | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
Non-Food Safety Areas | |||||
Audit | 2.2 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 1.5* |
PC Steps | 2.6 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 1.7* |
Cost | 1.9 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.3* |
Average | 2.2 | 3.7 | 1.5 | ||
Food Safety Areas | |||||
Food Risk | 2.8 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 1.4* |
FSMA | 2.4 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 1.2* |
Hazards | 2.4 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 1.6* |
Recall | 2.7 | 1.2 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 1.4* |
Verification | 2.2 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 1.9* |
Process Flow | 2.5 | 1.1 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 1.7* |
Product Description | 2.6 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 1.6* |
FSP Steps | 2.8 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 1.5* |
GMP | 2.9 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 1.3* |
GSP | 3.7 | 0.9 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 0.6* |
PC Rule | 2.1 | 0.9 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 2.0* |
Records | 3.2 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 1.2* |
Average | 2.7 | 4.1 | 1.4 | ||
N = 80 | N = 25 |
Note: Statistical significance denoted by *, from unpaired T-test with p>0.05. 5-point Likert scale from “Not knowledgeable at all” to “Extremely knowledgeable”.