Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 22;21(9):1716–1724. doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02349-9

Extended Data Fig. 2. Tracking performance comparison among BNP-Track, TrackMate, and u-track.

Extended Data Fig. 2

Same layout as Fig. 3 but for the x coordinate. a, BNP-Track’s MAP estimate compared to the one-emitter ground truth. b, TrackMate’s estimate compared to the one-emitter ground truth. Sets A and B are equivalent in this case. c, u-track’s estimate compared to the one-emitter ground truth. d, BNP-Track MAP estimates compared to the three-emitter ground truth. e,f, TrackMate estimates compared to the three-emitter ground truth with high localization quality threshold (e) and low localization quality threshold (f). TrackMate estimates compared to the three-emitter ground truth, respectively. In df, the top track of ground truth is the same as the ground truth in ac. The boxed regions in e and f highlight areas where TrackMate performs relatively poorly. See Supplementary Data 5 and 6. Localization resolution is not applicable (N/A) to TrackMate estimates due to missing track segments.

Source data