Table 2.
Scoring criteria for image analysis
| Parameter | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
|
Liver edge sharpness Hepatic vessel conspicuity |
Not delineated | Moderate blurring | Good delineation | Sharpest border |
| Bile duct conspicuity | Not delineated | Part or entire biliary system was shown with blurry margin | 2nd-order branch was delineated with blurry margin or 1st-order branch was delineated with clear margin | 1st- and 2nd-order branches were well delineated with clear margin |
|
Respiratory motion artifact Cardiac ghosting artifact Ringing artifact |
Severe artifacts causing impaired diagnostic capability of the readers | Moderate artifacts without diagnostic performance impairment | Mild artifacts without significant image quality disturbance | No or only minimal artifacts |
| Perceived SNR | Poor SNR (non-diagnostic) | Moderate SNR | Good SNR | Excellent SNR |
| Subjective noise level | Marked noise level | Moderate noise level | Mild noise level | Negligible noise level |
| Synthetic appearance | Severe synthetic appearance | Moderate synthetic appearance | Mild synthetic appearance | No synthetic appearance |
| Overall artifact level | Poor | Fair | Good | Excellent |
| Overall image quality | Poor | Fair | Good | Excellent |
| Lesion conspicuity | Poor delineation (not visible) | Fair delineation | Good delineation | Excellent delineation |
SNR signal–noise ratio