Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 16;34(10):6712–6725. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10693-9

Table 3.

Comparisons of image quality scores among standard, DL, and HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE on precontrast and HBP images

Image quality parameter Precontrast image HBP image
Standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE Difference p value Standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE Difference
(DL vs standard)
p value Difference
(HR-DL vs standard)††
p value Difference
(HR-DL vs DL)†††
p value
Liver edge sharpness 2.71 ± 0.27 (2–4) 3.22 ± 0.25 (1–4) 0.51 (0.46, 0.56)  < 0.001 2.85 ± 0.28 (2–4) 3.35 ± 0.22 (1–4) 3.36 ± 0.28 (2–4) 0.51 (0.46, 0.56)  < 0.001 0.51 (0.46, 0.56)  < 0.001 0.00 (− 0.04, 0.04) 0.026
Hepatic vessel conspicuity 2.74 ± 0.34 (2–4) 3.10 ± 0.35 (2–4) 0.36 (0.31, 0.41)  < 0.001 2.96 ± 0.33 (1–4) 3.33 ± 0.32 (1–4) 3.42 ± 0.32 (1–4) 0.37 (0.33, 0.41)  < 0.001 0.46 (0.42, 0.50)  < 0.001 0.09 (0.05, 0.13)  < 0.001
Bile duct conspicuity 3.02 ± 0.34 (1–4) 3.46 ± 0.29 (1–4) 3.41 ± 0.35 (1–4) 0.44 (0.39, 0.49)  < 0.001 0.40 (0.36, 0.44)  < 0.001  − 0.04 (− 0.08, 0.00) 0.968
Respiratory motion artifact 3.00 ± 0.36 (1–4) 3.14 ± 0.29 (1–4) 0.14 (0.08, 0.20)  < 0.001 3.08 ± 0.32 (1–4) 3.28 ± 0.29 (1–4) 3.28 ± 0.42 (1–4) 0.20 (0.15, 0.25)  < 0.001 0.20 (0.14, 0.26)  < 0.001  − 0.01 (− 0.06, 0.04) 0.498
Cardiac ghosting artifact 2.85 ± 0.35 (1–4) 3.23 ± 0.25 (2–4) 0.39 (0.33, 0.45)  < 0.001 2.94 ± 0.36 (1–4) 3.32 ± 0.27 (2–4) 3.25 ± 0.34 (2–4) 0.38 (0.32, 0.44)  < 0.001 0.31 (0.26, 0.36)  < 0.001  − 0.07 (− 0.12, − 0.02) 0.240
Ringing artifact 2.88 ± 0.29 (1–4) 3.22 ± 0.26 (2–4) 0.34 (0.29, 0.39)  < 0.001 2.98 ± 0.28 (1–4) 3.31 ± 0.27 (1–4) 3.32 ± 0.35 (1–4) 0.33 (0.28, 0.38)  < 0.001 0.34 (0.29, 0.39)  < 0.001 0.01 (− 0.04, 0.06) 0.080
Perceived SNR 2.67 ± 0.26 (2–4) 2.93 ± 0.31 (2–4) 0.27 (0.22, 0.32)  < 0.001 3.09 ± 0.34 (2–4) 3.44 ± 0.34 (2–4) 3.33 ± 0.46 (2–4) 0.35 (0.30, 0.40)  < 0.001 0.24 (0.19, 0.29)  < 0.001  − 0.11 (− 0.16, − 0.06) 0.001
Subjective noise level 2.56 ± 0.34 (1–4) 2.69 ± 0.36 (1–4) 0.13 (0.07, 0.19)  < 0.001 2.82 ± 0.32 (1–4) 3.09 ± 0.31 (2–4) 3.12 ± 0.48 (1–4) 0.27 (0.22, 0.32)  < 0.001 0.30 (0.24, 0.36)  < 0.001 0.03 (− 0.03, 0.09) 0.148
Synthetic appearance 3.37 ± 0.15 (2–4) 2.66 ± 0.30 (2–4)  − 0.71 (− 0.76, − 0.66)  < 0.001 3.37 ± 0.15 (2–4) 3.08 ± 0.33 (2–4) 3.36 ± 0.27 (2–4)  − 0.29 (− 0.34, − 0.24)  < 0.001  − 0.01 (− 0.05, − 0.03) 0.018 0.28 (0.23, 0.33)  < 0.001
Overall artifact level 2.66 ± 0.34 (1–4) 2.90 ± 0.29 (1–4) 0.24 (0.19, 0.29)  < 0.001 2.78 ± 0.30 (1–4) 3.09 ± 0.30 (1–4) 3.13 ± 0.44 (1–4) 0.30 (0.25, 0.35)  < 0.001 0.34 (0.29, 0.39)  < 0.001 0.04 (− 0.01, 0.09) 0.039
Overall image quality 2.65 ± 0.35 (1–4) 2.83 ± 0.35 (1–4) 0.18 (0.13, 0.23)  < 0.001 2.78 ± 0.30 (1–4) 3.16 ± 0.37 (1–4) 3.14 ± 0.48 (1–4) 0.38 (0.33, 0.43)  < 0.001 0.37 (0.31, 0.43)  < 0.001  − 0.01 (− 0.07, 0.05) 0.747

Unless indicated otherwise, data are means ± standard deviations (ranges). Group comparisons were performed with the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test

CAIPIRINHA controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration, DL deep learning, HBP hepatobiliary phase, HR high resolution, SNR signal–noise ratio, VIBE volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination

Data are differences in mean image quality scores between DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses

††Data are differences in mean image quality scores between HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and standard CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses

†††Data are differences in mean image quality scores between HR-DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and DL CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses