Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 27;14(9):6792–6805. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1705

Table 4. Comparison of postoperative and follow-up outcomes between the SBSG and ISF groups.

Item SBSG (n=67) ISF (n=21) P
Postoperative true-lumen diameter of the DAo (mm) 28.15±5.17 26.47±4.67 0.188
Change of the true-lumen diameter of the DAo (mm) 7.83±9.36a 9.46±6.49a 0.461
Postoperative false-lumen diameter of the DAo (mm) 12.73±10.43 11.59±7.61 0.645
Change of the false-lumen diameter of the DAo (mm) −7.19±10.57a −9.37±7.65a 0.385
Completed thrombosis of the false-lumen 64 (95.5) 17 (81.0) 0.091
Dead 0 (0) 1 (4.8) 0.239*
Endoleak 0.005*
   Type I 2 (3.0) 2 (9.5)
   Type II 0 (0) 3 (14.3)
Obstructed stent 0 (0) 2 (9.5) 0.055
Reoperative intervention 1 (1.5) 1 (4.8) 0.422*
Spinal cord ischemia 0 (0) 0 (0) NA
Stroke 0 (0) 0 (0) NA
Paraplegia 0 (0) 0 (0) NA

Data are represented as the mean ± SD or n (%). Change = postoperative – preoperative. a, paired t-test (postoperative vs. preoperative) P<0.001; *, Fisher exact test. SBSG, single-branched stent graft; ISF, in situ fenestration; DAo, descending aorta; NA, not applicable; SD, standard deviation.