Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 14;9:236–241. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2024.08.002

Table 2.

Diagnostic criteria for CIM.

All
(n = 22)
ICUAW−
(n = 2)
ICUAW+
(n = 20)
CIM−
(n = 10)
CIM+
(n = 12)
CIM− ICUAW+
(n = 8)
Clinical criteria (1) Critical illness 22/22, 100 % 2/2, 100 % 20/20, 100 % 10/10, 100 % 12/12, 100 % 8/8, 100 %
(2) Clinical weakness 20/22, 92 % 0/2, 0 % 20/20, 100 % 8/10, 80 % 12/12, 100 % 8/8, 100 %



Electrophysiological criteria (3–6) Combined 12/22, 55 % 0/2, 0 % 12/20, 60 % 0/10, 0 % 12/12, 100 % 0/8, 0 %
(3 & 4) NCS 12/22, 55 % 0/2, 0 % 12/20, 60 % 0/10, 0 % 12/12, 100 % 0/8, 0 %
(5) EMG/Inexcitability 15/22, 68 % 0/2, 0 % 15/20, 75 % 3/10, 30 % 12/12, 100 % 3/8, 38 %
(6) Repetitive Stimulation 0/22, 0 % 0/2, 0 % 0/20, 0 % 0/10, 0 % 0/12, 0 % 0/8,0 %



Muscle biopsy (7) M:A ratio 0.76 (±0.28) 0.71 (±0.033) 0.77 (±0.29) 0.88 (±0.35) 0.66 (±0.19) 0.93 (±0.35)

Note. Data are reported as mean (±standard deviation) or absolute numbers (percentages). The diagnostic criteria for CIM are divided into clinical and electrophysiological criteria, and muscle biopsy. See Latronico and Bolton (2011) for a detailed description of the individual criteria. ICUAW, intensive care unit acquired weakness; CIM, critical illness myopathy; NCS, nerve conduction studies; EMG, electromyography; M:A ratio, myosin:actin ratio.

The sample sizes of the different sub-groups refer to the total sample size of all included patients (n = 22).