Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 2;11:1393498. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1393498

Table 1.

Meta-analyses on associations between H. pylori infection and MGL risk.

Subsets Persistent vs. negative Eradicated vs. negative
Study count RR (95% CI) p-value Study count RR (95% CI) p-value
Total 8 1.58 (0.98–2.53) a 0.06 8 0.79 (0.43–1.45) a 0.44
Study design
RCT only 0 N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A
Cohort only 8 1.58 (0.98–2.53) a 0.06 8 0.79 (0.43–1.45) a 0.21
Country
Japan 1 0.82 (0.06–11.33) 0.88 1 1.01 (0.14–7.10) 0.99
Korea 7 1.61 (0.99–2.61) a 0.06 7 0.78 (0.40–1.50) a 0.45
Primary disease
EGC or dysplasia 1 3.80 (1.31–10.97) 0.01 1 5.41 (1.72–17.01) <0.01
EGC only 6 1.42 (0.79–2.57) a 0.24 6 0.64 (0.37–1.10) a 0.10
Dysplasia only 1 1.27 (0.58–2.78) 0.55 1 0.53 (0.26–1.10) 0.09
MGL outcome
MGC or dysplasia 3 1.93 (1.17–3.17) 0.01 3 1.03 (0.23–4.61) a 0.97
MGC only 5 1.35 (0.63–2.92) a 0.44 5 0.71 (0.37–1.35) a 0.29
Dysplasia only 0 N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A

CI, confidence interval; EGC, early gastric cancer; MGC, metachronous gastric cancer; MGL, metachronous gastric lesion; N/A, not applicable; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, risk ratio.

a

Random-effects model was used due to heterogeneity.