Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 10;9(9):2727–2738. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.07.004

Table 6.

Risk of transfer to hemodialysis-competing risks analysis

Variable Hazard ratio (competing risks multivariable) P value
Primary kidney disease
 Diabetic nephropathy
 Hypertension 0.3 (95% CI: 0.1–1.3) 0.1
 Polycystic kidney disease 0.7 (95% CI: 0.2–2.5 0.6
 Glomerulonephritis 1.2 (95% CI: 0.6–2.4) 0.6
 Other 1.0 (95% CI: 0.4–2.2) 0.97
Early-start peritoneal dialysis (ESPD) vs. conventional-start peritoneal dialysis (CSPD) 0.8 (95% CI: 0.4–1.5) 0.5
Modified Seldinger vs. laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion technique 1.0 (95% CI: 0.5–1.9) 0.98
Infectious complications
 PD-related peritonitisa 2.7 (95% CI: 1.5–4.8) 0.001
 PD exit site infection 0.9 (95% CI: 0.5–1.6) 0.7
 Tunnel infection 1.9 (95% CI: 0.7–5.2) 0.2
Mechanical Complications
 Pericatheter leak 1.4 (95% CI: 0.4–4.5) 0.6
 Malposition 2.8 (95% CI: 1.3–6.0) 0.01
 Pleuroperitoneal leak 12.7 (95% C.I 5.7–28.4) <0.001

A multivariate competing risk analysis was performed to examine variables contributing to time transfer to hemodialysis. Although timing of PD commencement and catheter insertion technique did not influence this outcome, the presence of PD-related peritonitis, catheter malposition, or pleuroperitoneal leak significantly shortened the time to transfer to hemodialysis.

a

PD-related peritonitis defined as peritonitis occurring after PD commencement.15