Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 16;23(5):e167–e174. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00641-7

Table 1:

Demographic and exposure characteristics of 122 human rabies breakthrough infections with or without deviations from core practices

All cases (n=122) Breakthrough infections with reported or possible deviations from core practices (n=68)* Breakthrough infections without deviations from core practices (n=54)*
WHO classification of human rabies case 4
Confirmed 56/122 (46%) 24/68 (35%) 32/54 (59%)
Probable 66/122 (54%) 44/68 (65%) 22/54 (41%)
Age, years
0–9 42/122 (34%) 17/68 (25%) 25/54 (46%)
10–19 27/122 (22%) 20/68 (29%) 7/54 (13%)
20–29 9/122 (7%) 7/68 (10%) 2/54 (4%)
30–39 8/122 (7%) 5/68 (7%) 3/54 (6%)
40–49 5/122 (4%) 2/68 (3%) 3/54 (6%)
50–59 17/122 (14%) 8/68 (12%) 9/54 (17%)
60–69 8/122 (7%) 5/68 (7%) 3/54 (6%)
70–79 4/122 (3%) 3/68 (4%) 1/54 (2%)
≥80 2/122 (2%) 1/68 (1%) 1/54 (2%)
Sex
Female 37/121 (31%) 20/67 (30%) 17/54 (31%)
Male 84/121 (69%) 47/67 (70%) 37/54 (69%)
Exposure
Dog 88/101 (87%) 41/47 (87%) 47/54 (87%)
Fox 4/101 (4%) 1/47 (2%) 3/54 (6%)
Wolf 3/101 (3%) 1/47 (2%) 2/54 (4%)
Mongoose 2/101 (2%) 1/47 (2%) 1/54 (2%)
Jackal 2/101 (2%) 1/47 (2%) 1/54 (2%)
Emin’s pouched rat (Cricetomys emini) 1/101 (1%) 1/47 (2%) 0/54 (0%)
Cat 1/101 (1%) 1/47 (2%) 0/54 (0%)
Exposure type
Bite 118/122 (97%) 66/68 (97%) 52/54 (96%)
Scratch 2/122 (2%) 2/68 (3%) 0/54 (0%)
Not specified 2/122 (2%) 0/68 (0%) 2/54 (4%)
Wound location
Face or neck 62/116 (53%) 28/63 (44%) 34/53 (64%)
Arms or hands 55/116 (47%) 30/63 (48%) 25/53 (47%)
Trunk or back 16/116 (14%) 8/63 (13%) 8/53 (15%)
Legs or feet 25/116 (22%) 15/63 (24%) 10/53 (19%)
Number of anatomical wound locations
1 81/116 (70%) 47/63 (75%) 34/53 (64%)
2 29/116 (25%) 14/63 (22%) 15/53 (28%)
3 5/116 (4%) 2/63 (3%) 3/53 (6%)
4 1/116 (1%) 0/63 (0%) 1/53 (2%)

Data are n/N (%).

*

Breakthrough infections without deviations from core practices were defined as infections for which the study reported wound cleaning (regardless of the thoroughness of wound cleaning), the study did not indicate a concern with the injection site of rabies vaccines (ie, about incorrect administration into the gluteal muscle), and the current authors could determine that vaccine doses had been given according to a validated vaccine schedule. Breakthrough infections with known or possible post-exposure prophylaxis deviations from core practices included those with deviations or possible deviations from at least one of the core practices.