Skip to main content
. 2005 May 13;102(21):7601–7606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408546102

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Linear progression of gainfi as opposed to irregular progression of lossfi.(A) TIRF image of an actin network. The framed areas are analyzed in BD at an acquisition rate of 20 Hz. (Scale bar: 5 μm.) (B) gainfi within the left frame of A. The loose network in this region facilitates the separation of a single element from its texture. (Upper) Consecutive TIRF images. The arrow in the leftmost panel indicates the direction of tip progression. (Lower) Difference images color-coded for gainfi (red) and lossfi (green). Frames separated by 150 msec were subtracted from each other to make the tip region clearly visible. The double arrow indicates tip advancement within the first 150 msec. Maximum projection (max 0–200 msec) of the difference images results in a red stretch ≈1 μm in length. (C) Line-scan profiles of the advancing tip region at intervals of 50 msec, as shown in red in B Lower.(D) lossfi within the right frame of A, where the loss predominates gain. (Upper) Sequence of TIRF images. (Lower) Frames separated by 750 msec were subtracted from each other to make the decay of fluorescence intensity visible. Difference images are color-coded for lossfi (green) and gainfi (red). The maximum projection (max 0–1,000 msec) of the difference images is shown at far right. (Scale bars in B and D:1 μm.)