Table 2.
A priori and observed correlations between PROMIS measures and myositis outcome measures
| n | Consensus exercise, % agreement voting members (n=14) | A priori hypothesi s for expected correlation | Observe correlation | Hypothesis confirmed? | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strength* | r (95% CI) | |||||
|
| ||||||
| PROMIS Pain Interference | ||||||
| Age | 129 | 14/14 (100%) | weak | weak | −0.14 (−0.3–0.03) | Yes |
| Patient global | 104 | 11/14 (79%) | moderate | moderate | 0.46 (0.3–0.6) | Yes |
| Physician global | 114 | 13/14 (93%) | weak | weak | 0.34 (0.2–0.5) | Yes |
| MMT | 114 | 14/14 (100%) | weak | weak | −0.21 (−0.4–0.0) | Yes |
| Creatine kinase | 128 | 14/14 (100%) | weak | weak | 0.01 (−0.2–0.2) | Yes |
| HAQ-DI | 40 | 10/14 (71%) | modeate | weak | 0.29 (0.0–0.6)† | No |
| PROMIS Fatigue | ||||||
| Age | 135 | 14/14 (100%) | weak | weak | −0.16 (−0.3–0.0) | Yes |
| Patient global | 108 | 13/14 (93%) | moderate | moderate | 0.54 (0.4–0.7) | Yes |
| Physician global | 118 | 14/14 (100%) | weak | moderate | 0.51 (0.4–0.6) | No |
| MMT | 913 | 8/14 (57%) | weak | moderate | −0.41 (−0.5– −0.2) | N/A |
| Creatine kinase | 4 | 10/14 (71%) | weak | weak | 0.2 (0.0–0.4) | Yes |
| HAQ-DI | 43 | 11/14 (79%) | moderate | moderate | 0.55 (0.3–0.7)† | Yes |
| PROMIS Physical Function | ||||||
| Age | 129 | 13/14 (93%) | weak | weak | 0.04 (−0.1–0.2) | Yes |
| Patient global | 104 | 10/14 (71%) | moderate | moderate | −0.64 (−0.7– −0.5) | Yes |
| Physician global | 114 | 11/14 (79%) | weak | moderate | −0.56 (−0.7– −0.4) | No |
| MMT | 114 | 13/14 (93%) | moderate | moderate | 0.49 (0.3–0.6) | Yes |
| Creatine kinase | 128 | 9/14 (64%) | weak | weak | −0.18 (−0.3–0.0) | N/A |
| HAQ-DI | 40 | 8/14 (57%) | moderate | strong | −0.83 (−0.9– −0.7)† | N/A |
Creatine kinase = log of creatine kinase activity/upper limit of normal; CI: confidence interval; HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; MMT: Manual muscle testing; N/A: not applicable, a priori consensus not reached so hypothesis not able to be confirmed
Cutoffs for interpretation were <0.4, 0.4–0.7, and >0.7 for weak, moderate, and strong correlations
Spearman correlation