Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 18;131(6):1043–1049. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02792-7

Table 1.

Characteristics of the contributing studies.

Study acronym Location and Type of study Year of diagnosis Number of cases (N = 5964)a Deaths (%) 5-year mortality (%) Median Follow-up in years (range)b Data availablec
AUS

Australia

Case-control

2002–2005 1159 819 (71%) 605 (52%) 10.8 (9.1–13.5) B/C/D/G/H
DOV

USA

Case-control

2002–2009 1040 624 (60%) 440 (43%) 11.7 (7.5–16.1) B/C
HAW

USA

Case-control

1994–2008 378 218 (58%) 149 (40%) 10.2 (4.0–21.0) B/C/D/G/H
LAC

USA

Case-control

1994–2004 639 439 (69%) 281 (44%) 15.9 (4.1–26.2) B/C/D/G
MAL

Europe

Case-control

1994–1998 93 74 (80%) 50 (55%) 22.3 (20.2–23.4) B/C
MCC

Australia

Cohort

1990–2008 99 74 (75%) 56 (58%) 19.5 (11.0–25.7) B/C/H
NEC

USA

Case-control

1992–2008 1386 788 (57%) 536 (39%) 12.9 (6.9–22.8) B/C/D
NJO

USA

Case-control

2005–2008 196 116 (59%) 73 (38%) 9.0 (5.9–11.2) B/C/G
OPL

Australia

Case-only

2012–2015 718 373 (52%) 316 (44%) 6.6 (0.8–8.7) B/C/D/G/H
POL

Europe

Case-control

2000–2003 256 140 (55%) 129 (53%) 5.3 (0.1–7.2) B/C

AUS Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, DOV Diseases of the Ovary and their Evaluation Study, HAW Hawaii Ovarian Cancer Study, LAC Los Angeles County Case–Control Studies of Ovarian Cancer, MAL Danish Malignant Ovarian Tumour Study, MCC Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, NEC New England Case–Control Study of Ovarian Cancer, NJO New Jersey Ovarian Cancer Study, OPL Ovarian Cancer Prognosis and Lifestyle Study, POL Polish Ovarian Cancer Study.

aWomen who completed the diet questionnaire > 2 years after diagnosis are excluded; deaths within the first year are included.

bAmong women who had not died.

cB = Black tea, C = Coffee – all, D = Decaffeinated vs. caffeinated coffee, G = Green tea, H = Herbal tea; All except MAL and POL also had total caffeine intake.