Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):160. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01140-5

Fig. 3. OS in t-AML vs. de novo AML (logrank test).

Fig. 3

A OS within the entire cohort of intensively treated patients: survival with t-AML is inferior to de novo AML. B OS within the entire cohort of non-intensively treated patients: no significant difference between t-AML and de novo AML. C OS of patients with APL: no significant difference between t-APL and de novo APL. D OS of patients with ELN 2010 favorable risk: no significant difference between t-AML and de novo AML. E OS of patients with ELN 2010 intermediate risk: survival with t-AML is inferior to de novo AML. F OS of patients with ELN 2010 adverse risk: survival with t-AML is inferior to de novo AML. n number of patients, OS overall survival, t-AML therapy-related AML, APL acute promyelocytic leukemia, ELN European LeukemiaNet.