Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 24;56:102520. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102520

Table 3.

Summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of outcomes of one-stage and two-stage revision for shoulder PJI. *N.B. All outcomes reported or converted to reinfection rates rather than infection clearance/eradication rates for consistency.

Institution No. Shoulders Findings* Notes
Nelson, G. N. et al.17 (2016) Rothman Institute for Orthopaedic Surgery, PA, USA 543 6.2 % reinfection rate for two-stage, 8.3 % for one-stage 38.9 % Cutibacterium acnes infections. No significant difference between one stage (with or without unexpected positive cultures) or two-stage revision protocols
George, D. et al.57 (2016) University College London Hospitals, London, UK 217 9.2 % reinfection rate for two stage, 5.3 % for one-stage Almost double the number of studies examining two-stage vs. one stage. No significant difference between groups.
Kunutsor, S.K. et al.58 (2019) Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, UK 498 11.5 % reinfection rate for two-stage 5.3 % for one-stage. 147 one-stage, 351 two-stage. Higher infection clearance rate with one-stage vs. two-stage but significant. Robust methodology, protocol registered prospectively.
Fiore, M. et al.59 (2023) IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli/University of Bologna, Italy 486 14.3 % reinfection rate for two-stage, 4.4 % for one-stage. Significant difference reported, majority infections with P. acnes or S. epidermidis. Conclude single stage is at least as effective as two-stage revision.
Rodrigues-Lopes, R. et al.60 (2024) University Hospital Center of Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal 711 8.8 % reinfection rate for two-stage, 1.2 % for one-stage. 185 shoulders for one-stage and 526 for two-stage revision. Mentions that the ‘right conditions’ are needed for one-stage; low virulence organism, favourable host and minimal bone loss.
Bdeir, M. et al.56 (2024) University Medical Center Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Germany 1048 12.9 % two-stage reinfection rate, 10.9 % one-stage reinfection rate Significant difference between two groups. 7x number of Staph. Aureus infections in one-stage group. Predominantly C. acnes. Double number of two-stage vs one-stage procedures.