Table. Prevalence of Cancer Screening in Hot Spots of Social Vulnerability, Environmental Burden, and Social-Environmental Injustice.
| Characteristic | SEI hot spots (n = 410) | Non–SEI hot spots (n = 7381) | Prevalence difference (95% CI) | P valuea | Hot spot of SV alone (n = 1559) | Non–hot spots of SV alone (n = 6232) | Prevalence difference (95% CI) | P valuea | Hot spots of EB alone (n = 1401) | Non–hot spots of EB alone (n = 6390) | Prevalence difference (95% CI) | P valuea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Populationb | 4140 (1726) | 4180 (1892) | NA | .90 | 4146 (1682) | 4186 (1932) | NA | .50 | 4210 (1855) | 4171 (1891) | NA | .30 |
| Cervical cancer screeningb | 78.4 (3.4) | 82.5 (4.4) | −4.1 (−4.5 to −3.6) | <.001 | 79.1 (3.7) | 83.0 (4.3) | −3.9 (−4.1 to −3.6) | <.001 | 81.3 (4.5) | 82.5 (4.4) | −1.2 (−1.5 to −1.0) | <.001 |
| New York City, New York | 80.8 (5.7) | 83.7 (4.7) | NA | .004 | 81.1 (4.4) | 84.0 (4.6) | NA | <.001 | 84.8 (4.3) | 83.2 (4.7) | NA | <.001 |
| Los Angeles County, California | 78.8 (3.0) | 82.2 (4.5) | NA | <.001 | 78.2 (3.6) | 81.9 (4.4) | NA | <.001 | 79.8 (3.7) | 81.5 (4.7) | NA | <.001 |
| Cook County, Illinois | 78.9 (2.6) | 82.9 (3.7) | NA | <.001 | 79.8 (2.7) | 82.8 (3.7) | NA | <.001 | 81.2 (3.8) | 82.4 (3.7) | NA | <.001 |
| Harris County, Texas | 78.2 (2.5) | 82.8 (3.7) | NA | <.001 | 77.8 (3.1) | 82.5 (3.8) | NA | <.001 | 79.0 (3.1) | 81.8 (4.1) | NA | <.001 |
| Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania | 79.2 (2.2) | 83.5 (4.5) | NA | <.001 | 79.7 (3.0) | 83.3 (4.3) | NA | <.001 | 81.4 (3.3) | 82.9 (4.5) | NA | <.001 |
| Maricopa County, Arizona | 77.0 (2.8) | 84.5 (2.9) | NA | <.001 | 78.1 (2.9) | 84.1 (3.3) | NA | <.001 | 78.5 (4.0) | 83.7 (3.4) | NA | <.001 |
| Colorectal cancer screeningb | 51 (6) | 62 (8) | −10.6 (−11.4 to −9.8) | <.001 | 53 (6) | 63 (7) | −10.6 (−11.0 to −10.2) | <.001 | 59 (9) | 62 (8) | −2.9 (−3.3 to −2.4) | <.001 |
| New York City, New York | 56 (6) | 62 (7) | NA | <.001 | 55 (5) | 63 (7) | NA | <.001 | 65 (8) | 61 (7) | NA | <.001 |
| Los Angeles County, California | 54 (5) | 66 (7) | NA | <.001 | 54 (5) | 66 (7) | NA | <.001 | 59 (7) | 64 (8) | NA | <.001 |
| Cook County, Illinois | 52 (6) | 63 (6) | NA | <.001 | 53 (6) | 63 (6) | NA | <.001 | 58 (8) | 61 (7) | NA | <.001 |
| Harris County, Texas | 45 (4) | 57 (7) | NA | <.001 | 45 (6) | 56 (8) | NA | <.001 | 47 (6) | 55 (8) | NA | <.001 |
| Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania | 53.9 (4.2) | 66.4 (6.0) | NA | <.001 | 54 (6) | 66 (6) | NA | <.001 | 62 (7) | 64 (7) | NA | .01 |
| Maricopa County, Arizona | 48 (6) | 65 (6) | NA | <.001 | 50 (6) | 64 (6) | NA | <.001 | 53 (8) | 63 (7) | NA | <.001 |
| Mammography useb | 76.6 (3.4) | 78.5 (3.4) | −.1.9 (−2.3 to −1.6) | <.001 | 78.1 (3.7) | 78.4 (3.3) | −.0.3 (−0.5 to −0.1) | .30 | 78.1 (3.6) | 78.4 (3.4) | −0.3 (−0.5 to −0.1) | <.001 |
| New York City, New York | 81.06 (2.04) | 80.56 (3.15) | NA | .30 | 81.16 (2.20) | 80.75 (3.17) | NA | .02 | 81.45 (3.07) | 80.68 (3.01) | NA | <.001 |
| Los Angeles County, California | 77.90 (1.55) | 78.77 (1.45) | NA | <.001 | 78.08 (1.59) | 78.64 (1.47) | NA | <.001 | 77.96 (1.45) | 78.66 (1.49) | NA | <.001 |
| Cook County, Illinois | 79.14 (2.37) | 79.41 (2.39) | NA | .30 | 80.59 (2.35) | 79.28 (2.40) | NA | <.001 | 78.75 (2.35) | 79.74 (2.43) | NA | <.001 |
| Harris County, Texas | 74.94 (2.33) | 76.28 (1.90) | NA | <.001 | 75.11 (2.39) | 76.14 (1.96) | NA | <.001 | 74.94 (2.21) | 76.07 (2.05) | NA | <.001 |
| Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania | 75.92 (1.37) | 79.31 (2.68) | NA | <.001 | 78.32 (2.31) | 78.69 (2.97) | NA | .20 | 75.05 (1.32) | 79.23 (2.61) | NA | <.001 |
| Maricopa County, Arizona | 71.80 (1.47) | 73.02 (1.80) | NA | <.001 | 71.53 (1.41) | 73.01 (1.79) | NA | <.001 | 72.27 (1.69) | 72.79 (1.83) | NA | <.001 |
a
Calculated with t test.
b
Values are mean (SD).