Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 2;4(9):2220–2233. doi: 10.1021/acsestengg.4c00211

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Modeling PFOA degradation in UV/SO3–2 with estimated values of hydrated electron formation rate (Reaqf) and scavenging capacity (kS) in (A) No Particles, (B) GAC, (C) CNT, and (D) Lignin systems. The markers illustrate measured total (aqueous + sorbed) PFOA degradation. Black and red lines represent the lower (lowest generation Reaqf, highest scavenging kS) and upper (highest generation Reaqf, lowest scavenging k’S) bounds on the kinetic models respectively based on the standard error measured for these parameters (Reaqf and kS) for each system (No Particles, GAC, CNT, and Lignin). Experiments were run at pH 10 with 20 mM initial SO3–2 and [PFOA]0 = 12 μM (*for GAC, [PFOA]0,aq = 0.1 μM), irradiated with 254 nm light at ambient temperature (20 °C). The bimolecular rate constant kPFOA= 3.40 × 107 M–1 s–1 is an average from reported literature values from Huang et al. (5.10 × 107 M–1 s–1)77 and Szajdzinska-Pietek et al. (1.70 × 107 M–1 s–1).78 Markers are the means of experimental duplicates, and error bars represent their standard error. *In the GAC system (B), measured PFOA concentrations are only from the aqueous phase ([PFOA]0,aq = 0.1 μM), thus excluding adsorbed PFOA.